Here's How Donald Trump Could Become President

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reuters polls show huge electoral shift to Trump despite Hillary outspending Trump on campaign ads by a whopping 3300%
 
This is another take on the events:

The First Iraq War Was Also Sold to the Public Based on a Pack of Lies
http://billmoyers.com/2014/06/27/th...o-sold-to-the-public-based-on-a-pack-of-lies/

"Most countries condemned Iraq’s 1990 invasion of Kuwait. But the truth — that it was the culmination of a series of tangled economic and historical conflicts between two Arab oil states — wasn’t likely to sell the US public on the idea of sending our troops halfway around the world to do something about it.
So we were given a variation of the “domino theory.” Saddam Hussein, we were told, had designs on the entire Middle East. If he wasn’t halted in Kuwait, his troops would just keep going into other countries.

Fool Me Once…
The first Gulf War was sold on a mountain of war propaganda. It took a campaign worthy of George Orwell to convince Americans that our erstwhile ally Saddam Hussein — whom the US had aided in his war with Iran as late as 1988 — had become an irrational monster by 1990. http://foreignpolicy.com/articles/2...prove_america_helped_saddam_as_he_gassed_iran

Twelve years later, the second invasion of Iraq was premised on Hussein’s supposed cooperation with al Qaeda, vials of anthrax, Nigerian yellowcake and claims that Iraq had missiles poised to strike British territory in little as 45 minutes.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-139703/Just-45-minutes-attack.html
"

I could understand how the Zinn school of history could see the conflict in this light, but the reality is that he threatened the entire world economy with his reckless gambit and the world united to restore stability in the region and beat him back to his borders. This latter was a big, huge fucking mistake, as bad as ignoring Patton's admonition to not stop at Germany, but to take out the Soviets as well...
 
Trump's son just threatened to inject poison into Hallowe'en candies.


He knows they could be his undoing. Six hours of scrutiny and it ain't his boisterous rallies where he can bullshit to his heart's delight and the deplorables eat his shit up like warm brownies. Good luck fatso.

https://cdn.meme.am/instances/66481900.jpg
 
Trump is right, they have rigged the system. Just last night I was watching CNN who told a bald face lie by inserting "racially" into Trump's quote about profiling.

Since when do debates run in 15 minute segments? Since you have a sickly candidate who is meant to win.

A regular, fair debate wold be fun for all because indeed Trump's tendency to say a whole lot of BS without saying anything at all would shine right through. Meanwhile, HRC will be having couging fits and possibly pass out from exhaustion.

Highest ratings ever!

So let's cut the shit and have real debates.
 
This is another take on the events:

The First Iraq War Was Also Sold to the Public Based on a Pack of Lies
http://billmoyers.com/2014/06/27/th...o-sold-to-the-public-based-on-a-pack-of-lies/

"Most countries condemned Iraq’s 1990 invasion of Kuwait. But the truth — that it was the culmination of a series of tangled economic and historical conflicts between two Arab oil states — wasn’t likely to sell the US public on the idea of sending our troops halfway around the world to do something about it.
So we were given a variation of the “domino theory.” Saddam Hussein, we were told, had designs on the entire Middle East. If he wasn’t halted in Kuwait, his troops would just keep going into other countries.

Fool Me Once…
The first Gulf War was sold on a mountain of war propaganda. It took a campaign worthy of George Orwell to convince Americans that our erstwhile ally Saddam Hussein — whom the US had aided in his war with Iran as late as 1988 — had become an irrational monster by 1990. http://foreignpolicy.com/articles/2...prove_america_helped_saddam_as_he_gassed_iran

Twelve years later, the second invasion of Iraq was premised on Hussein’s supposed cooperation with al Qaeda, vials of anthrax, Nigerian yellowcake and claims that Iraq had missiles poised to strike British territory in little as 45 minutes.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-139703/Just-45-minutes-attack.html
"

The first Iraq war was a mistake, and George H.W. Bush, being president at the time, was primarily responsible for that mistake. The second Iraq war was also a mistake, and George W. Bush, being president at the time, was primarily responsible for that mistake.
 
Trump is right, they have rigged the system. Just last night I was watching CNN who told a bald face lie by inserting "racially" into Trump's quote about profiling.

Since when do debates run in 15 minute segments? Since you have a sickly candidate who is meant to win.

A regular, fair debate wold be fun for all because indeed Trump's tendency to say a whole lot of BS without saying anything at all would shine right through. Meanwhile, HRC will be having couging fits and possibly pass out from exhaustion.

Highest ratings ever!

So let's cut the shit and have real debates.
Congrats to you for watching CNN.
 
I hate CNN. It was only on because my sister was at my place and thinks it is a legit news source. Five minutes in, they were spinning lies.

Of course you are likely a big fan.

Channels continue to change. . .
 
I hate CNN. It was only on because my sister was at my place and thinks it is a legit news source. Five minutes in, they were spinning lies.

Of course you are likely a big fan.
I would never pay for cable TV, especially a channel that also carries commercials.

I read and watch online sources, across the spectrum.
 
The first Iraq war was a mistake, and George H.W. Bush, being president at the time, was primarily responsible for that mistake. The second Iraq war was also a mistake, and George W. Bush, being president at the time, was primarily responsible for that mistake.

Mistakes? Deliberate policy, dude.
 
I would never pay for cable TV, especially a channel that also carries commercials.

I read and watch online sources, across the spectrum.

Clearly not. You regurgitate corporate propaganda and only corporate propaganda.
 
Trump is alleged to have used charitable donations to cover his legal fees.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...c88f9c-7d11-11e6-ac8e-cf8e0dd91dc7_story.html

The case involving the flagpole at Trump’s oceanfront Mar-a-Lago Club began in 2006, when the club put up a giant American flag on the 80-foot pole. Town rules said flagpoles should be 42 feet high at most. Trump’s contention, according to news reports, was: “You don’t need a permit to put up the American flag.”

The town began to fine Trump, $1,250 a day.

Trump’s club sued in federal court, saying that a smaller flag “would fail to appropriately express the magnitude of Donald J. Trump’s . . . patriotism.”
And fail to compensate for the size of his willy.
 
Trump's son just threatened to inject poison into Hallowe'en candies.


Trump is alleged to have used charitable donations to cover his legal fees.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...c88f9c-7d11-11e6-ac8e-cf8e0dd91dc7_story.html

And fail to compensate for the size of his willy.

A: ALLEGED
B: Washington post

yep...you fail.

But I get it. Anything to deflect from the:

"On its 2013 tax forms, the most recent available, the foundation claimed it spent $30 million on payroll and employee benefits; $8.7 million in rent and office expenses; $9.2 million on “conferences, conventions and meetings”; $8 million on fundraising; and nearly $8.5 million on travel."

not to mention the whole 6% they actual use for charities.....

But hey..Deflect deflect deflect.... At this point it is all you got.

https://nightclubsecurityconsulting.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/ani-wonder_deflection.gif
 
In order to get a fuller picture of the Clinton Foundation’s operations, he said, people need to look at the foundation’s consolidated audit, which includes the financial data on separate affiliates like the Clinton Health Access Initiative.
“Otherwise,” he said, “you are looking at just a piece of the pie.”
Considering all of the organizations affiliated with the Clinton Foundation, he said, CharityWatch concluded about 89 percent of its budget is spent on programs. That’s the amount it spent on charity in 2013, he said.
We looked at the consolidated financial statements (see page 4) and calculated that in 2013, 88.3 percent of spending was designated as going toward program services — $196.6 million out of $222.


From factcheck.org

A: ALLEGED
B: Washington post

yep...you fail.

But I get it. Anything to deflect from the:

"On its 2013 tax forms, the most recent available, the foundation claimed it spent $30 million on payroll and employee benefits; $8.7 million in rent and office expenses; $9.2 million on “conferences, conventions and meetings”; $8 million on fundraising; and nearly $8.5 million on travel."

not to mention the whole 6% they actual use for charities.....

But hey..Deflect deflect deflect.... At this point it is all you got.

https://nightclubsecurityconsulting.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/ani-wonder_deflection.gif


Already debunked.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top