Here's How Donald Trump Could Become President

Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree.

The fact that they bleach their skin, wont associate or fuck a person of their race, and consistently take the white old mans side....makes them something.

You tell me what.

Ask LF. IDK what it is....but she wont date a black man if you paid her I can tell you that.....

See my av, I.am still a darkie. Darkie my whole life. There goes.your theory white lonely fgt... So you fufked low hanging black fruit with low self esteem...
 
Donald has a new plan to win the election.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...trump-clinton-secret-service-disarm/90523014/

Trump: Clinton's Secret Service should disarm, 'see what happens to her'

Donald Trump said that Hillary Clinton's "bodyguards" should disarm themselves because Clinton supports gun control during a rally in Miami on Friday. He has made similar remarks in the past, but this time took it a little further.

"Take their guns away," Trump said. "She doesn't want guns. Let's see what happens to her. Take their guns away. It would be very dangerous."
 
...my life and people.

"...my...people"?

:D

Hate to break it to you, racist piece of shit...

...but a whole bunch of your "people" don't even consider themselves distant neighbors of your pitiful plantation mentality.

Hardly nothing more utterly ridiculous than a black racist piece of shit fantasizing she speaks as "...my...people", unless she actually means simply other racist pieces of shit like herself.
 
Im suspicious of the black republicans. The ones I hear all seem to have racial axes to grind. Against their own race....and I find it weird.

Its like reverse wiggers or IDK wtf.

lol

You're suspicious of Republicans; the color doesn't matter.

They're deplorable (and now mad as hell).
 
Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charitable Grants Rea

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/16/j...n-foundation-budget-actually-went-to-charity/

"Just 5.7 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s massive 2014 budget actually went to charitable grants, according to the tax-exempt organization’s IRS filings. The rest went to salaries and employee benefits, fundraising and “other expenses.”

The Clinton Foundation spent a hair under $91.3 million in 2014, the organization’s IRS filings show. But less than $5.2 million of that went to charitable grants.


That number pales in comparison to the $34.8 million the foundation spent on salaries, compensation and employee benefits.

Another $50.4 million was marked as “other expenses,” while the remaining almost $851K was marked as “professional fundraising expenses.”"
 
In order to get a fuller picture of the Clinton Foundation’s operations, he said, people need to look at the foundation’s consolidated audit, which includes the financial data on separate affiliates like the Clinton Health Access Initiative.
“Otherwise,” he said, “you are looking at just a piece of the pie.”
Considering all of the organizations affiliated with the Clinton Foundation, he said, CharityWatch concluded about 89 percent of its budget is spent on programs. That’s the amount it spent on charity in 2013, he said.
We looked at the consolidated financial statements (see page 4) and calculated that in 2013, 88.3 percent of spending was designated as going toward program services — $196.6 million out of $222.


From factcheck.org
 
Donnie Drumpf might win the election if the demographics which loved Liberace and Gorgeous George turn out in record numbers. He appears to be, after all, what would happen if there were a brownout while Dr. Frankenstein were attempting to splice their genies.
 
In order to get a fuller picture of the Clinton Foundation’s operations, he said, people need to look at the foundation’s consolidated audit, which includes the financial data on separate affiliates like the Clinton Health Access Initiative.
“Otherwise,” he said, “you are looking at just a piece of the pie.”
Considering all of the organizations affiliated with the Clinton Foundation, he said, CharityWatch concluded about 89 percent of its budget is spent on programs. That’s the amount it spent on charity in 2013, he said.
We looked at the consolidated financial statements (see page 4) and calculated that in 2013, 88.3 percent of spending was designated as going toward program services — $196.6 million out of $222.


From factcheck.org

You mean like the Clinton Library and all that Haiti money that went to her brother and ended up building hotels?

"The problem here is not one of facts or accuracy, but ideology. Jacobson simply doesn’t like the implications of the fact that the Clinton Foundation spent less than 10 percent of its budgets on charitable grants in 2013. He doesn’t like the fact that the two single largest “charitable” initiatives of the Clinton Foundation — by its own admission — are the Clinton Presidential Library, which exists solely to put a positive spin on the 42nd president’s term in office, and the Clinton Global Initiative, which the New York Times characterized as a “glitzy annual gathering of chief executives, heads of state, and celebrities.” If hanging out with celebrities at glitzy dinners is the height of charity, then it’s time to beatify the Kardashian sisters."

https://www.quora.com/What-percenta...ities-that-are-not-controlled-by-the-Clintons

I notice that we have no list of the people who get the money and whether or not that they have actually done anything "charitable."

Liberal watchdog groups tend to rate the Foundation well, while others give it poor marks.
 
You mean like the Clinton Library and all that Haiti money that went to her brother and ended up building hotels?

"The problem here is not one of facts or accuracy, but ideology. Jacobson simply doesn’t like the implications of the fact that the Clinton Foundation spent less than 10 percent of its budgets on charitable grants in 2013. He doesn’t like the fact that the two single largest “charitable” initiatives of the Clinton Foundation — by its own admission — are the Clinton Presidential Library, which exists solely to put a positive spin on the 42nd president’s term in office, and the Clinton Global Initiative, which the New York Times characterized as a “glitzy annual gathering of chief executives, heads of state, and celebrities.” If hanging out with celebrities at glitzy dinners is the height of charity, then it’s time to beatify the Kardashian sisters."

https://www.quora.com/What-percenta...ities-that-are-not-controlled-by-the-Clintons

I notice that we have no list of the people who get the money and whether or not that they have actually done anything "charitable."

Liberal watchdog groups tend to rate the Foundation well, while others give it poor marks.

You totally missed the point of the whole article if that's what you got from it.
 
Not that new; this is the second time Trump, not some lunatic raving outside the bus station but the presidential nominee of a major party, has mused about Clinton being assassinated.
The first time he suggested that "Second Amendment people" could become motivated. This time he's suggesting taking away Clinton's Second Amendment rights. Those seem very different to me.
 
The first time he suggested that "Second Amendment people" could become motivated. This time he's suggesting taking away Clinton's Second Amendment rights. Those seem very different to me.

He did no such thing.

He called upon her to lead by example...

Her security detail can still step up and take a bullet for her.

:confused:

What the fuck is wrong with you?

WHAT'S YOUR DEGREE IN?
 
Bad, bad, bad week for Hillary Clinton..

So, what does her husband do? Have yet another fund raiser for the Clinton Foundation....amazing...
 
The first time he suggested that "Second Amendment people" could become motivated. This time he's suggesting taking away Clinton's Second Amendment rights. Those seem very different to me.

Now we know which candidate wants to take away Americans' 2nd Amendment rights.
 
There's supposedly one right here on the GB.

Granted, this is the Internet...

Hillary has 95% of the African American Vote.....odds are pretty slim I'll actually meet, in person, a black fella that is voting Trump..

once in a while, Fox News rolls one out....but thats show bit-ness
 
Hillary has 95% of the African American Vote.....odds are pretty slim I'll actually meet, in person, a black fella that is voting Trump..

once in a while, Fox News rolls one out....but thats show bit-ness

Numerous polls currently show Trump getting 15-25% of the black vote, a few even more. The USC/LA times poll, which currently indicates Trump has 19.6% of that vote, is one example. It will be interesting to see the actual percentage Trump gets in real votes come November. I suspect he will do considerably better than Romney did, but we shall see.
 
Numerous polls currently show Trump getting 15-25% of the black vote, a few even more. The USC/LA times poll, which currently indicates Trump has 19.6% of that vote, is one example. It will be interesting to see the actual percentage Trump gets in real votes come November. I suspect he will do considerably better than Romney did, but we shall see.



http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/trump-is-in-fourth-place-among-black-voters/



Granted, this is five weeks old, but I seriously doubt he has ten times as much black support now as he did then.

It's just a guess, but I'm assuming Trump's track record of discriminating against African-Americans in real estate and his over-the-top disrespect for the first black president has not endeared him to the black community, aside from people on his payroll like Omarosa.

Oldest rule of politics: if people believe you don't like them, they aren't going to vote for you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top