Here's How Donald Trump Could Become President

[Pookie]

That's something a wussy with small hands and a peanut allergy would say.

For his sake, I hope he's on the "no fly" list.

 

[neci]

i'd rather help my state go more libertarian (it is already very fiscally conservative) just more aligned with individual human rights to women's reproduction; out of the bedroom's church house orgies. i have a history of third party voting, so i'd rather stick with that than some democratic ideal that's being pushed down my throat by the clinton administration. my immediate reaction after benghazi was utter repulsion by her response. as much as i wanted to vote for her, i no longer feel tied to her out of some sort of duty. like any other politician, including trump, politicians will read the paper passed to them. i don't trust either one, and my vote will reflect that as it always has. my state will stay red. the democrats need to focus on congressional seats. the puppets will fight it out.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Oh, you don't think Trump isn't in this entirely to line his pockets in a whole different league to the Clintons

I didn't say he wasn't and they are in the same league you blindly partisan tool.

Yes, Clinton has her baggage.

Understatement of the year.

But if you can't see a significant gap between her as president of the United States and Donald Trump as president of the United States, you're just dumb as a rock.

I can see the gap and it's a matter of which special interest get their pee pee's sucked on and which countries we pick our next war with.

That's about it.

I think you're going to be very disappointed in November too, as Trump is managing this campaign about as well as you manage your postings to the forum.

I don't think you could cram anymore incorrect assumption into such few words.

You assume that I'm a Trump supporter because I don't have my face buried in Clintons ass like you do. Wrong, I don't give 2 pumps of rat shit who wins in November and I got over my disappointment in the USA and it's degenerate government/citizenry a long time ago.


Either Trump burns the house down and I make fuck tons of money, or Clinton keeps us on the slow death by NeoLib/Con parasites and I still make tons of money.

 

[sr71plt]

my state will stay red. the democrats need to focus on congressional seats. the puppets will fight it out.

Be sure to come back after the election and let us know if your state remained red in the presidential vote. I think it will be very interesting this time to see which ones did.

 

[toubab]

Well, alrighty then. I guess you have time to spend gobs of posts yammering about nothing you care about.

Your grasp of logic is unfailingly non-existent. The absolute fact I couldn't care less how the people on this board vote, or even whether they vote at all, has nothing to do with my interest in this election or my interest in the poll being discussed. I am obviously interested in the election and the poll, and just to make it clear to you, I'm also not interested in the least about what you or anybody else on this board does about voting or not voting.

 

[sr71plt]

Your grasp of logic is unfailingly non-existent. The absolute fact I couldn't care less how the people on this board vote, or even whether they vote at all, has nothing to do with my interest in this election or my interest in the poll being discussed. I am obviously interested in the election and the poll, and just to make it clear to you, I'm also not interested in the least about what you or anybody else on this board does about voting or not voting.

Yep, that logic represents you well.

You seem a little unhappy with the way this thread is going.

 

[toubab]

Yep, that logic represents you well.

You seem a little unhappy with the way this thread is going.

Actually, I'm quite happy with the thread. I'm amused by how aggravated Hillary supporters are about it.

 

[sr71plt]

Actually, I'm quite happy with the thread. I'm amused by how aggravated Hillary supporters are about it.

Why? It's quite obvious that Trump is throwing the election to Hillary. If she loses, it's because she screwed herself legally (which is always possible)--which he's doing himself left and right as well (e.g., Trump University; illegal use of alien workers, soliciting foreign contributions, being in bed with the Russians with illegal transactions; promoting violence and putting a target on Clinton's back) on top of all the rest of his daily missteps. He isn't actually running a campaign at all, because he changes his campaign staff weekly. Your stupidity on how this campaign is going comparatively is fun to read. It's why I and others are spinning you out on this.

I think you're vying with a few others here on being the Katrina Pierson of the Literotica discussion boards. You do have a lot of competition here for that honor, though.

I'm happy for anyone who thinks Trump's campaign is going well comparatively with Clinton's, though. Let's keep that zany illusion going for the next couple of months.

 

[underguy1]

The fact that Trump is throwing the campaign to Clinton doesn't make the Clinton bots look all that intelligent.

Let alone the ethics and morality of voting for a heinous war criminal.

And then there are those that propagate her talking points and her vile Russophobia.

 

[sr71plt]

I love it when you try to show your objective nature, Underguy.

 

[toubab]

Why? It's quite obvious that Trump is throwing the election to Hillary. If she loses, it's because she screwed herself legally (which is always possible)--which he's doing himself left and right as well (e.g., Trump University; illegal use of alien workers, soliciting foreign contributions, being in bed with the Russians with illegal transactions; promoting violence and putting a target on Clinton's back) on top of all the rest of his daily missteps. He isn't actually running a campaign at all, because he changes his campaign staff weekly. Your stupidity on how this campaign is going comparatively is fun to read. It's why I and others are spinning you out on this.

I think you're vying with a few others here on being the Katrina Pierson of the Literotica discussion boards. You do have a lot of competition here for that honor, though.

I'm happy for anyone who thinks Trump's campaign is going well comparatively with Clinton's, though. Let's keep that zany illusion going for the next couple of months.

Your interpretation of my view on just about anything is fun to read. No matter how many times I say I think Trump's chances of winning this election are slim and none, you insist I think things are going well for him. If things were going well for him he'd be so far ahead of her people like you would be suicidal. You should be glad he keeps shooting himself in the foot. As it is, his unforced errors are keeping her alive. His only chance to win is if he stops fucking up constantly. If he can do that, which seems highly unlikely, based on past performance, he might actually scrape through with a win. That thought obviously frightens you. It doesn't frighten me.

 

[toubab]

USC/LA Times poll

http://cesrusc.org/election/

Clinton 44.0

Trump 43.4

 

[underguy1]

I love it when you try to show your objective nature, Underguy.

I don't give a flying fuck what you love or don't love.

As if you'd tell the truth about anything anyway. It's just in your nature to lie.

 

[about_average]

Where I came up with that shit was actually reading the page you linked, their description of the methodology used, and their own FAQ..

See, your problem is that you just don't know what the word "likely" means. Only toubob knows what "likely" means. He gets his definitions from Trump and he's the arbiter of the meaning of words.

i'd rather help my state go more libertarian (it is already very fiscally conservative) just more aligned with individual human rights to women's reproduction; out of the bedroom's church house orgies. i have a history of third party voting, so i'd rather stick with that than some democratic ideal that's being pushed down my throat by the clinton administration. my immediate reaction after benghazi was utter repulsion by her response. as much as i wanted to vote for her, i no longer feel tied to her out of some sort of duty. like any other politician, including trump, politicians will read the paper passed to them. i don't trust either one, and my vote will reflect that as it always has. my state will stay red. the democrats need to focus on congressional seats. the puppets will fight it out.

Luckily Trump only knows what he reads on the internet, or so he claims.

I can see the gap and it's a matter of which special interest get their pee pee's sucked on and which countries we pick our next war with.

Clinton will pick which country to have a war with. Trump's choice will be entirely random, based a “joke” or “sarcasm”.

 

[Adre]

Donald Trump's new campaign manager Kellyanne Conway put a positive spin Thursday on the Republican nominee's recent swoon in national and state polls.
"I think it helps us to be a little bit behind, and we are."


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/trump-campaign-responds-low-polls-227146#ixzz4HhVvrJhn
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

Yet you never hear the leader saying it would help if we were losing.

 

[BettyPoop]

Donald Trump's new campaign manager Kellyanne Conway put a positive spin Thursday on the Republican nominee's recent swoon in national and state polls.
"I think it helps us to be a little bit behind, and we are."


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/trump-campaign-responds-low-polls-227146#ixzz4HhVvrJhn
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

Yet you never hear the leader saying it would help if we were losing.

Big Ass, Little Behind. Good.

 

[Que]

Donald Trump's new campaign manager Kellyanne Conway put a positive spin Thursday on the Republican nominee's recent swoon in national and state polls.
"I think it helps us to be a little bit behind, and we are."


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/trump-campaign-responds-low-polls-227146#ixzz4HhVvrJhn
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

Yet you never hear the leader saying it would help if we were losing.

It didn't really help Romney to be winning in the polls did it? Actually is perfectly logical you want people who are likely to be motivated to know that it's important for them to go to the polls to support your candidate, you would love to see Clinton supporters be complacent.

 

[Adre]

It didn't really help Romney to be winning in the polls did it? Actually is perfectly logical you want people who are likely to be motivated to know that it's important for them to go to the polls to support your candidate, you would love to see Clinton supporters be complacent.

Funny, I don't recall Mittens up double digits in PA, VA, WI, CO etc. Any leads he might have had in any swing states were marginal at best.

 

[toubab]

See, your problem is that you just don't know what the word "likely" means. Only toubob knows what "likely" means. He gets his definitions from Trump and he's the arbiter of the meaning of words.

I guess Nate Silver doesn't know what "likely" means, either. Only geniuses like you morons can figure that out, I guess.

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/national-polls/

"USC Dornsife/LA Times 2,500 LV"

 

[phrodeau]

http://www.vox.com/a/trump-tax

The 2016 presidential election was supposed to be close — but Republicans should have had the edge.

An election forecast built by Vox and a team of political scientists projects that a generic Republican should win 50.9 percent of the two-party vote in 2016. But Donald Trump isn’t a generic Republican — and he is polling at 45.1 percent of the two-party vote, according to the Huffington Post Pollster. The difference between those numbers — 5.8 points, as of today — is what we’re calling the Trump Tax: the electoral penalty Republicans appear to be paying for nominating Trump.

The Trump tax waxes and wanes with changes in Trump and Clinton's polling. In mid-July, as Trump enjoyed a polling bounce coming out of the Republican Convention, the tax shrunk. All the same, Trump never improved enough to match the fundamentals model. And after the Democratic Convention, Clinton's bump pushed Trump further behind than he'd been all summer, and weeks later, that bump shows no signs of dissipating.

 

[Pookie]

I guess Nate Silver doesn't know what "likely" means, either. Only geniuses like you morons can figure that out, I guess.

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/national-polls/

"USC Dornsife/LA Times 2,500 LV"

He does. And Nate Silver also sees issues with that poll, and adjusts it accordingly to Clinton leading by 5% instead of 1%. He's yet to give it a grade since it is just in it's first year.

The model weights each poll by its sample size, how recently it was conducted, and the historical accuracy and methodology of the polling firm. The model then adjusts each poll based on other factors.

Doesn't bode well for it's validity. And Nate is the gold standard when it comes to analyzing polls.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Clinton will pick which country to have a war with. Trump's choice will be entirely random, based a “joke” or “sarcasm”.

Well that make a her SOOOOOOOOO much better!!!

Oh look someone else called Clinton a warhawk, better go defend the American Angels honor !!!

 

[toubab]

He does. And Nate Silver also sees issues with that poll, and adjusts it accordingly to Clinton leading by 5% instead of 1%. He's yet to give it a grade since it is just in it's first year.

The model weights each poll by its sample size, how recently it was conducted, and the historical accuracy and methodology of the polling firm. The model then adjusts each poll based on other factors.

Doesn't bode well for it's validity. And Nate is the gold standard when it comes to analyzing polls.

I'm glad you finally seem to realize I was right about the USC/LA Times poll being a likely voter poll, and also that it's impossible, at this point, to evaluate it for accuracy, as I previously explained.

As an aside, this election has brought out a lot of nastiness in people, and on reflection, I think this thread has been a contributor to that. That was not my intent in creating the thread.

 

[Que]

Funny, I don't recall Mittens up double digits in PA, VA, WI, CO etc. Any leads he might have had in any swing states were marginal at best.

You're probably right. Clinton has this in the bag. It would probably just as well that you to go ahead and skip voting, sit home, and start gloating early.

 

[Disgustipated]

You're probably right. Clinton has this in the bag. It would probably just as well that you to go ahead and skip voting, sit home, and start gloating early.

That's what the BroPatrol did in 2008. We learned from their very expensive lesson.