LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Here's How Donald Trump Could Become President

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aside from Hillary's deteriorating health, we have gems of the first lady in waiting...

All told, over the last five years, Bill Clinton was paid $17.5 million. His position? "Honorary chancellor," where he acted as an adviser and goodwill ambassador.

Editor Lifson questioned the relationship:

Why on Earth would a company with huge financial backing have faulty control (internal accounting) systems? These are not underfunded amateurs. I am deeply suspicious that the systems were designed in order to conceal, not inform. The money paid to both Clintons as community property and to the foundation they control looks a lot like the purchase of influence and reputation out in the open. There may well be officials in the 28 countries where Laureate operates whose influence and prestige (among other things) would be helpful to Laureate but who lack the ability to be so open about the transaction.​

In addition to the millions paid to Clinton, Laureate turned around and donated up to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation. Taken with the problems with record-keeping, you have to wonder whether Laureate is one gigantic scam where rich people buy power and influence using the Clintons' vast global reach to futher enrich themselves.

Laureate says that its international operations represent the largest global network of degree-granting universities in the world, enrolling more than 1 million students across 28 countries. In the United States, the company owns Walden University, a Minneapolis-based online school that the Education Department has placed on a list of colleges that officials are more closely monitoring because of concerns over its “financial responsibility.”​
Click to expand...



http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...e_over_5_years_175_million.html#ixzz4HIxprwFq
 
The fact that several months before elections we are constantly told that a candidate has already won definitely rings an alarm bell. Orwellian “Newspeak” morphed today into NewsSpeak, with the mainstream media acting as thought police. While we are being nonchalantly reminded about a long list of observable crimes that go unpunished, the media cheer those crimes’ authors and try to contaminate us with the “enthusiasm.” One can’t help but notice how visionary Orwell’s writing was: “o much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don’t even know that fire is hot.”

Joanna Rosamond, The American Thinker
 
So we have one candidate who has shown all of her income for the past thirty years or so and one who refuses and lies about why he can't and won't. Where's Orwell stand on that little gem?
 
Last week [mid-April] we learned "the New York Times examined Bill Clinton’s relationship with a Canadian mining financier, Frank Giustra, who has donated millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation and sits on its board. Clinton, the story suggests, helped Giustra’s company secure a lucrative uranium-mining deal in Kazakhstan and in return received 'a flow of cash' to the Clinton Foundation, including previously undisclosed donations from the company’s chairman totaling $2.35 million.”

The same Canadian company, renamed Uranium One, bought uranium concessions in the United States;
The Russian government came calling and sought to buy that Canadian company for a price that would mean big profits for the Canadian investors;
For the Russians to buy that Canadian company, it would require the approval of the Obama administration, including Hillary’s State Department, because uranium is a strategically important commodity;
Nine shareholders in Uranium One just happened to provide more than $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation in the run-up to State Department approval;
Some of the donations, including those from the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Teler, were kept secret, even though the Clintons promised to disclose all donations;
Hillary’s State Department approved the deal;
The Russian government now owns 20 percent of U.S. uranium assets.


http://www.americanthinker.com/arti...ndation_under_fed_scrutiny.html#ixzz4HJ6hxV1R



How proud you must be of your candidate, the one who gave all of her charity giving to, well, her so she can use it to continue to pay her dream team the big bucks just like she did when she also employed them in the state department where they got to double dip...

And please explain what Bill did to earn the $1 million dollar salary as an "honorary chancellor."

And when will she let us read those speeches?

And when will the US Attorney announce bribery charges against the Foundation?

And when will you care about Haiti and the Haitians where the "charity" of the Foundation went only into the pockets of their crony donators?

And all you can talk about is Trump's taxes?

Remember, too, after the Clinton's released their Foundation Tax Returns, they were discovered to be fraudulent and incomplete and the Clintons got to walk away from that lie and deceit without repercussion.

After all of that, I don't give a flying fuck about Trump's returns and I suspect a lot of people don't either.

And all of this despite the fact that the election is over and Clinton has already won...

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Has she shown

ALL

of her income to us for the last 30 years?

And all of us who are reading your claim this morning know, for a fact that she lies about everything...
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
The same Canadian company, renamed Uranium One, bought uranium concessions in the United States;
The Russian government came calling and sought to buy that Canadian company for a price that would mean big profits for the Canadian investors;
For the Russians to buy that Canadian company, it would require the approval of the Obama administration, including Hillary’s State Department, because uranium is a strategically important commodity;
Nine shareholders in Uranium One just happened to provide more than $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation in the run-up to State Department approval;
Some of the donations, including those from the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Teler, were kept secret, even though the Clintons promised to disclose all donations;
Hillary’s State Department approved the deal;
The Russian government now owns 20 percent of U.S. uranium assets.


http://www.americanthinker.com/arti...ndation_under_fed_scrutiny.html#ixzz4HJ6hxV1R



How proud you must be of your candidate, the one who gave all of her charity giving to, well, her so she can use it to continue to pay her dream team the big bucks just like she did when she also employed them in the state department where they got to double dip...

And please explain what Bill did to earn the $1 million dollar salary as an "honorary chancellor."

And when will she let us read those speeches?

And when will the US Attorney announce bribery charges against the Foundation?

And when will you care about Haiti and the Haitians where the "charity" of the Foundation went only into the pockets of their crony donators?

And all you can talk about is Trump's taxes?

Remember, too, after the Clinton's released their Foundation Tax Returns, they were discovered to be fraudulent and incomplete and the Clintons got to walk away from that lie and deceit without repercussionr.

After all of that, I don't give a flying fuck about Trump's returns and I suspect a lot of people don't either.

And all of this despite the fact that the election is over and Clinton has already won...

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

i started a response but deleted it. As it is I'm looking at eight more years of your Clinton hatred and the thought tires me out. Enjoy your American Thinker masturbation sessions.
 
It's also possible that in the face of your unwavering support of criminal behavior, that you cannot offer cogent rebuttal for fear of making the hole too deep...


:cool:
 
Here are just a few examples D’Souza details:
With no competitive bidding an outfit owned by Warren Buffet’s company was awarded money to build “hurricane-proof trailers” and, instead built such shoddy, unsafe trailers they had to be abandoned.
Without requiring InnoVida, headed by a Clinton donor, to provide the required financial statement, $10 million of U.S. funds were loaned to them to build housing.
The company, however, defaulted on the loan and never built any houses. An investigation revealed that Osorio had diverted company funds to pay for his Miami Beach mansion, his Maserati, and his Colorado ski chalet. He pleaded guilty to wire fraud and money laundering in 2013, and is currently serving a twelve-year prison term on fraud charges related to the loan.

USAID funds were directed to other Clinton cronies to build schools in Haiti. None were built; the funds went to “an Earth Day celebration and tree-building activity”.

Millions went from the U.S. Treasury funds to provide cell phones to Haitians to another crony who used them to create a lucrative near monopoly on phone service and another grant of $45 million went to him to build a hotel, which employs few Haitians and is largely unoccupied.

And then there is Hillary’s brother, Hugh, who profited from a “finder’s fee” from a company awarded one of the two gold-mining permits granted by the Haitian government.





Boy, oh boy do I suspect that the Trump Tax returns are going to be far worse than this stinking cesspool of corruption created with



OUR TAX DOLLARS!​
 
We'll patiently await your report on all of Trump's shady, perhaps even criminal, dealings after Googling and cherry picking theirs.
 
Law? Law? We don't need no stinkin' Law!

How much Clinton Foundation money actually makes it to charitable causes? Ortel says, “It’s impossible to tell from the filings. You are supposed to tell from the filings, and it’s impossible to tell. One of the biggest expenses in the recent period in the Clinton Foundation is for pharmaceuticals for supposedly fighting HIV Aids. If this were a well-run charity, you would provide a detailed breakdown of what pharmaceuticals by type and at what price. There is none of that disclosure. You don’t know if that pharmaceutical number is completely made up or not. You have no way of telling, and the auditors have never done their work. This is why I say this is a text book case study in global charity fraud. It needs to be exposed as such.”

How did this so-called charity get so far off track? Ortel explains, “When you look at any foundation, and the Clinton Foundation in particular, you have to check and see what its authorized tax exempt purposes are. Because this entity raises money from the public continuously... they have to be very specific. Their authorized tax exempt purpose, stated in their application dated 23 December 2007, was just supposed to be Presidential archival research facility in Little Rock. They never have been authorized as far as I can tell from the public filings... they have never been authorized to fight HIV Aids, fight climate change, convene meetings in New York and set up these various initiatives. None of them has been validly authorized, which means they have been raising money with materially false and misleading public filings. They have been doing it using the mail, using the Internet and using telephones, all of which is a federal crime.

Thanks to Clarice Feldmen for bringing this all together in one article.
 
As I said, eight years is a long time. Ever think of going to join miles?:rolleyes:
 
Adre said:
We'll patiently await your report on all of Trump's shady, perhaps even criminal, dealings after Googling and cherry picking theirs.
Click to expand...

I'm not the one denying that Trump has not skirted the law in his public life.

Remember, I'm voting for the responsible adult and we all suspect that you're going to vote for a criminal, a serial liar, and a woman who made herself incredibly wealthy while on the public payroll through graft and bribery.

Nothing The Donald has done rises to her level of criminality or that is what ya'll would have been talking about instead of Melania's speech and invisible calls for assassinations...

:rolleyes:

But, you have nothing, so you have to pretend that you have something in order to justify your vote to further put the knife into the taxpayer...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

FiveInch033
Real economics....not the bubble Marxists live in..
2
Replies
30
Views
464
RightField
RightField
SissyBrandi19
Summer 2025 Reading List Challenge!!!
Replies
2
Views
244
SissyBrandi19
SissyBrandi19
TwystedDzyre
If Trump could bring a sexual revolution, what all it could include??!!
2
Replies
26
Views
1K
Lazaran
L
B
The following, while related to the election, transcends politics - it is a message of hope for all who seek unity and peace. Plus, there's a coupon.
Replies
7
Views
782
PaxNurgle
P
F
Richard Lewis, who mined life and neuroses for dark comedy, dies at 76
Replies
0
Views
255
FL30
F
Back
Top