Here's How Donald Trump Could Become President

Status
Not open for further replies.
There is no fucking way Trump was talking about assassination. You people are crazy.

I think when the secret service has a talk with him, it's time to admit you were wrong.

Any "objective" person would.
 
Have any of the talking heads informed 2b00b of what exactly Drumpf meant? I mean really- what was the intent of his comment? Please, just make an educated guess.
 
Funny thing is, Trump's freefall in the polls seem to have just now levelled out. It's as if he knew it was happening and thought "I'm having none of that, let's say something really twatty!"

I need to find a way to use that in casual conversation. Thank you for improving the discourse of America.
 
Have any of the talking heads informed 2b00b of what exactly Drumpf meant? I mean really- what was the intent of his comment? Please, just make an educated guess.

I thought people liked Trump because he says what he means.
 
Look what I found

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-secretservice-idUSKCN10L29W

"Official: No formal Secret Service discussions with Trump camp on remark"

"A federal official on Wednesday said the U.S. Secret Service had not formally spoken with Republican Donald Trump's presidential campaign regarding his suggestion a day earlier that gun rights activists could stop Democratic rival Hillary Clinton from curtailing their access to firearms.

Following Trump's comment at a rally on Tuesday in which he suggested that gun rights activists could stop Clinton from appointing liberal anti-gun justices to the U.S. Supreme Court, a federal official familiar with the matter told Reuters that there had been no formal conversations between the Secret Service and the Trump campaign.

Earlier CNN had reported that there had been multiple conversations between the campaign and the agency."

"No such meeting or conversation ever happened," Trump wrote on Twitter, accusing CNN of having made up the report."

Who to believe? :D
 
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-secretservice-idUSKCN10L29W

"Official: No formal Secret Service discussions with Trump camp on remark"

"A federal official on Wednesday said the U.S. Secret Service had not formally spoken with Republican Donald Trump's presidential campaign regarding his suggestion a day earlier that gun rights activists could stop Democratic rival Hillary Clinton from curtailing their access to firearms.

Following Trump's comment at a rally on Tuesday in which he suggested that gun rights activists could stop Clinton from appointing liberal anti-gun justices to the U.S. Supreme Court, a federal official familiar with the matter told Reuters that there had been no formal conversations between the Secret Service and the Trump campaign.

Earlier CNN had reported that there had been multiple conversations between the campaign and the agency."

"No such meeting or conversation ever happened," Trump wrote on Twitter, accusing CNN of having made up the report."

Who to believe? :D

With the number of times Trump has been caught not telling the truth and the fact that Trump incites people to violence there's no question who to believe.
 
:D

Progressives love to "believe" and vote for a woman who publicly accused a 12-year-old girl of being complicit in her own devastating rape by a 41-year-old man.
 
With the number of times Trump has been caught not telling the truth and the fact that Trump incites people to violence there's no question who to believe.

If that is true surely you can link article after article of Trump supporters visiting violence on Clinton supporters.

I'll pop some corn while you assemble those myriad of links.

Ishmael
 
With the number of times Trump has been caught not telling the truth and the fact that Trump incites people to violence there's no question who to believe.

You can't decide whether to believe Trump that it didn't happen or the Secret Service that it didn't happen? Why don,t we just go with it didn't happen and leave it at that?
 
If that is true surely you can link article after article of Trump supporters visiting violence on Clinton supporters.

I'll pop some corn while you assemble those myriad of links.

Ishmael

Feel free to pop while you read about Trump wanting to punch people at the DNC, or him offering to pay the legal fees of those who would hit people for him.
 
You can't decide whether to believe Trump that it didn't happen or the Secret Service that it didn't happen? Why don,t we just go with it didn't happen and leave it at that?

When did the Secret Service say it didn't happen?
 
Feel free to pop while you read about Trump wanting to punch people at the DNC, or him offering to pay the legal fees of those who would hit people for him.

Look asshole, give us actual violent acts. Not what your fucking talking points are telling you to say. Facts shit for brains, not exercises in 'mind reading.'

Ishmael
 
Look asshole, give us actual violent acts. Not what your fucking talking points are telling you to say. Facts shit for brains, not exercises in 'mind reading.'

Ishmael

Already did, which is why you've been reduced to sputtering and name calling.
 
Reads like what a home school question-and-answer session with VatAss must've been like.
 
The CNN link said there were conversations.

So you have then three choices. The agency and the candidate who would know about conversations because if they happened, they were there, or CNN who was not there reporting that they heard things about a conversation they were not a party to, because they were not invited and because it didn't happen.

The Secret Service does not "investigate" publicaly made hyperbollic statements that are not actual threats as understood by anyone with a functioning brain, even if doing so would give fodder to a campaign desparately looking to distract from their candidate having been actually interviewed as the target of an actual FBI investigation into the commission of an actual, punishible crime, tbat the FBI outlines as having occurred, notwithstanding their decision not to refer the case (not a security review) for prosecution.
 
So you have then three choices. The agency and the candidate who would know about conversations because if they happened, they were there, or CNN who was not there reporting that they heard things about a conversation they were not a party to, because they were not invited and because it didn't happen.

The Secret Service does not "investigate" publicaly made hyperbollic statements that are not actual threats as understood by anyone with a functioning brain, even if doing so would give fodder to a campaign desparately looking to distract from their candidate having been actually interviewed as the target of an actual FBI investigation into the commission of an actual, punishible crime, tbat the FBI outlines as having occurred, notwithstanding their decision not to refer the case (not a security review) for prosecution.

You're even more long winded than I am.

The nut of the matter is that CNN reported conjecture as fact.

Ishmael
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top