Here's How Donald Trump Could Become President

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ok, it wasn't Hillary who invaded Iraq, it was Bush.
Happy now?

Apparently you also think working hard is a sacrifice like loosing a son serving his country since you're completely ignoring that comment. And you apparently think the Kahn's had no right to talk about Trump, who obviously hasn't read the constitution.
Do you also think if fine, like Trump does, to mock a grieving mother?

Hillary voted to authorize the war in Iraq. Not trump. She is more reasonably responsible for the son's death than Trump.

There is nothing in the constitution that prevents the US denying entry to foreigners on any basis it chooses.

The grieving mother shouldn't have gotten on the stage if she didn't want to catch return fire.
 
I never said he did, AJ. What he said was that there should be "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States ".
His first statement about it, or an early one, would have banned even citizens from reentering. He later backtracked of course, but his true beliefs got out. Like requiring Muslim citizens to carry special ID and closing mosques.
 
Hillary voted to authorize the war in Iraq. Not trump. She is more reasonably responsible for the son's death than Trump.
No one said he was responsible, why do you keep pretending like someone did?
Kahn was talking about the sacrifices military personnel and their families have made for the country and the fact that Trump hasn't, to the point of getting 5 deferments from military service.

There is nothing in the constitution that prevents the US denying entry to foreigners on any basis it chooses.
:rolleyes: Do try to keep up.
The constitution specifically says Khan has the right to say the things he did. Trump says he had no right to. Proving Khan's statement.

The grieving mother shouldn't have gotten on the stage if she didn't want to catch return fire.
WTF?!
 
No one said he was responsible, why do you keep pretending like someone did?
Kahn was talking about the sacrifices military personnel and their families have made for the country and the fact that Trump hasn't, to the point of getting 5 deferments from military service.


I sensed the specific reason they were there was to remind Americans that the entire family, including the son who gave his life for others, would never have been allowed into the country had Trump's proposed Muslim ban been in effect.



The grieving mother shouldn't have gotten on the stage if she didn't want to catch return fire.


Wow, this puts you squarely in a class with busybody. Congratulations.
 
No one said he was responsible, why do you keep pretending like someone did?
Kahn was talking about the sacrifices military personnel and their families have made for the country and the fact that Trump hasn't, to the point of getting 5 deferments from military service.

:rolleyes: Do try to keep up.
The constitution specifically says Khan has the right to say the things he did. Trump says he had no right to. Proving Khan's statement.

WTF?!

Did Hillary have some military service nobody seems to know about? Did Bill? The prospective first gentleman? Why point the finger at Trump and not them about lack of military service? It's obvious why, to any objective observer.

What the fuck? Now you're trying to say Trump meant Khan doesn't have freedom of speech? That's fucking hilarious. Khan's holding up his copy of the constitution had nothing to do with freedom of speech.

You're being ridiculous.
 
I sensed the specific reason they were there was to remind Americans that the entire family, including the son who gave his life for others, would never have been allowed into the country had Trump's proposed Muslim ban been in effect.






Wow, this puts you squarely in a class with busybody. Congratulations.

You keep leaving out the temporary part of the ban. Not a surprise.

If she can't stand the heat, she needs to get out of the kitchen.
 
TRUMP: It’s ― look, you know, I have my own ideas. He’s not going into Ukraine, OK, just so you understand. He’s not gonna go into Ukraine, all right? You can mark it down. You can put it down. You can take it anywhere you want ―


And this doofus could be running foreign policy...oy.
 
Being ignorant and indignant in the same sentence is unbecoming of a 2b00b.

Why don't you alleviate me of my ignorance, genius? Or do you just want to throw out a word like "liticide" and pretend it has some obvious relevance to me?
 
Did Hillary have some military service nobody seems to know about? Did Bill? The prospective first gentleman? Why point the finger at Trump and not them about lack of military service? It's obvious why, to any objective observer.
Obviously you never saw or read a transcript of Khan's remarks.
Here, for your edification. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ranscript-father-muslim-soldier-a7161616.html

What the fuck? Now you're trying to say Trump meant Khan doesn't have freedom of speech? That's fucking hilarious. Khan's holding up his copy of the constitution had nothing to do with freedom of speech.
Trump said he had no right to say what he said. It was very clear what he said. He didn't say it was uncalled for, disrespectful or anything similar. He said he had no right to.

You're being ridiculous.
Only to a Trump apologist.

You Hillary defenders are idiots.
Where have I defended Hillary? Quote me.
 
Obviously you never saw or read a transcript of Khan's remarks.
Here, for your edification. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ranscript-father-muslim-soldier-a7161616.html

Trump said he had no right to say what he said. It was very clear what he said. He didn't say it was uncalled for, disrespectful or anything similar. He said he had no right to.

Only to a Trump apologist.

Where have I defended Hillary? Quote me.

Okay, I read the transcript. Khan was off base. The US Constitution gives no rights to foreigners trying to enter the US. None. The US can institute a ban against Muslims if it chooses. Perfectly constitutional. Can institute a ban against left handed people if it wishes. Tall people. Short people. Anybody it chooses.

I can't believe you people seriously believe Trump was talking about a constitutional right when he said Khan had no right to say what he did. That's fucking ridiculous.

I'm defending Trump on this because he's being unfairly attacked. No other reason.

All your attacks are against Trump. None against Hillary.
 
Hillary voted to authorize the war in Iraq. Not trump. She is more reasonably responsible for the son's death than Trump.

There is nothing in the constitution that prevents the US denying entry to foreigners on any basis it chooses.

The grieving mother shouldn't have gotten on the stage if she didn't want to catch return fire.

It was a DNC stunt, bait if you will, and Trump took it....
 
Originally posted by above_average


The grieving mother shouldn't have gotten on the stage if she didn't want to catch return fire.
WTF?!

I guess you never commented on a public speech or post? Never?

I'm just saying this is nothing new and everyone does it. Media, blogs, you and me.
 
Originally posted by above_average


The grieving mother shouldn't have gotten on the stage if she didn't want to catch return fire.
WTF?!

I guess you never commented on a public speech or post? Never?

I'm just saying this is nothing new and everyone does it. Media, blogs, you and me.

Well, if you're going to put it out there.....one has to be able to take the criticism.

Action/reaction....

But if she were allowed to speak, she should have said something....anything
 
Okay, I read the transcript. Khan was off base. The US Constitution gives no rights to foreigners trying to enter the US. None. The US can institute a ban against Muslims if it chooses. Perfectly constitutional. Can institute a ban against left handed people if it wishes. Tall people. Short people. Anybody it chooses.

I can't believe you people seriously believe Trump was talking about a constitutional right when he said Khan had no right to say what he did. That's fucking ridiculous.

I'm defending Trump on this because he's being unfairly attacked. No other reason.

All your attacks are against Trump. None against Hillary.
You really need to pay more attention to the stuff Trump says, then you wouldn't look so dense.

And your last comment is BS. But since you are so blissfully unaware of the stuff trump says, I wouldn't expect you to notice things I say.

Originally posted by above_average


The grieving mother shouldn't have gotten on the stage if she didn't want to catch return fire.
WTF?!

I guess you never commented on a public speech or post? Never?

I'm just saying this is nothing new and everyone does it. Media, blogs, you and me.
Sure people do, but Trump is the first person I've ever seen attack someone for not speaking. Add the fact that it was the parents of a soldier who died in combat and it's even more despicable.
Then he had the temerity to say he's sacrificed by working hard.
 
Last edited:
Okay, I read the transcript. Khan was off base. The US Constitution gives no rights to foreigners trying to enter the US. None. The US can institute a ban against Muslims if it chooses. Perfectly constitutional. Can institute a ban against left handed people if it wishes. Tall people. Short people. Anybody it chooses.

I can't believe you people seriously believe Trump was talking about a constitutional right when he said Khan had no right to say what he did. That's fucking ridiculous.

I'm defending Trump on this because he's being unfairly attacked. No other reason.

All your attacks are against Trump. None against Hillary.

agreed

they all ignore the attacks on the Benghazi Mothers
 
You really need to pay more attention to the stuff Trump says, then you wouldn't look so dense.

And your last comment is BS. But since you are so blissfully unaware of the stuff trump says, I wouldn't expect you to notice things I say.

I pay attention to the stuff Trump says. Close attention. I've learned how to interpret his language. It's imprecise, and there's no calculation to it. He says what's on his mind, but almost in his own form of English. It takes time to understand that language. Interestingly, he seems to have no restrictor plate, or not much of one. That's both good and bad, in my opinion. He's a bit of a loose cannon. Some people obviously like that about him. Some don't.
 
I pay attention to the stuff Trump says. Close attention. I've learned how to interpret his language. It's imprecise, and there's no calculation to it. He says what's on his mind, but almost in his own form of English. It takes time to understand that language. Interestingly, he seems to have no restrictor plate, or not much of one. That's both good and bad, in my opinion. He's a bit of a loose cannon. Some people obviously like that about him. Some don't.
I guess you think shutting down places of worship based on a religious test and forcing people of a particular religion to carry an ID identifying their religion would pass a constitutional test? Hell, even forcing everyone to carry such an ID wouldn't pass.

Trump has clearly not read the constitution and apparently you haven't either.

but yeah, he was just being 'imprecise". :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top