How can someone be elected president who couldn't get a security clearance?

We have our answer. He cannot answer the challenge to his own serious charge, that I was voting for Hillary by not voting for Trump. Now watch him run away from that which he has pronounced "the loser."

There you have it...the essence of liberalism.
 
There you have it...the essence of liberalism.

He declared victory, cut and run and is blessedly finally leaving us alone.

;) ;)

He'll make the charge, but never explain or defend the charge.

He knows I can destroy his basic premise with a few logically-structured sentences. If he does anything in the future, it will be to ridicule this statement, mind you, not refute it with any logic, just declare it "stupid..."
 
I wonder if a single one of them understand (or even explain why) why my vote for Gary BIG Johnson is neither a vote for P. T(rump). Barnum or the Transgendered Richard Rodham Nixon...

Let's consider that the challenge of the day.

You brag that you're pissing your vote away and then beg us to care about why you're being an idiot? To call this a "challenge" would require an ounce of fucks.
 
How dare you all not stay on the totally bogus topic?!?!?! :mad:

It's not like Hillary has top secret security clearance, that she would need one to get the briefings given to all nominees, or that clearance given to the President of the United States fall under the laws governing security clearances.
 
How dare you all not stay on the totally bogus topic?!?!?! :mad:

It's not like Hillary has top secret security clearance, that she would need one to get the briefings given to all nominees, or that clearance given to the President of the United States fall under the laws governing security clearances.

The only thing bogus is your premise.

The Secretary of State is required to have top secret security clearance. She still has it until it is revoked. The point is it should be revoked because she failed to protect it by keeping classified information on a private server.
 
Hillary Clinton has yet to be elected and the Usual Suspects are already trying to de-legitimize her upcomin' victory.

The Age of White Patriarchy draws to a close, so they retreat to a simpler time, a time that never was: A Return To Leave It To Beaver World, where June vacuumed the house wearing pearls.

Sweet Jesus Christ. :eek:
 
How can anyone support a candidate for the Presidency of the United States who created a fake university for fun and profit?

So, I should support the woman who got a no-show job for her husband at a University that came with a HUGE salary, but subsequently received quit a large amount of money from the government.

Reminds me of when Senator Obama's wife was bringing in a 6-figure income at a hospital that also received subsequently, a butt-load of money from the government.

Now my choice is between, using your logic, someone who rolled the gullible and someone who used the taxpayers as a piggy bank to award their spouses and sell access to influence...
 
In the history of US elections, has a candidate ever accepted the party nomination while still under investigation by the government they intend to lead?
 
Your next President...

...

There are many examples of Hillary Clinton’s erratic behavior as First Lady, such as throwing large items at Bill Clinton’s face, and not allowing Secret Service to look her in the eye. Also, there is the now famous greeting of the Secret Service officer: “Good morning Ma’am.” “Fuck off,” replied Hillary. You could never picture Donald Trump this unhinged, whom we are supposed to now regard as “dangerous.” And Bill Clinton is reputed to have been perfectly amiable with Secret Service and other workers. But let’s focus on Hillary’s more recent career. These examples are culled from Edward Klein’s Unlikable. The thesis is that Hillary has a congenital unlikable quality, which cannot be fixed.

Micromanaging: According to a Foreign Service officer who served while Clinton was Secretary of State, “It soon became apparent that Hillary’s people were going to turn the place upside down and try to micromanage everything to save Hillary’s ass.” If you worked in the State Department under Hillary, you weren’t allowed to do your job, your input was not sought, and you were not respected as a professional. That might sound familiar to anyone who has had a boss of this variety. Instead of having a leader focused on the big picture, they’re breathing down your neck, neurotically second guessing every step you take. And indeed, Clinton had no imprint on the big picture during her stint at the State Department.

To be fair, the White House didn’t really let her make substantive decisions as Secretary of State. Apparently she was only appointed in the spirit of “keep your enemies closer.” The White House itself was in effect managed by women too, Valerie Jarrett, Senior Advisor; and yes, Michelle Obama, who has stuck her nose into matters well outside the purview of the First Lady, a tradition started by Hillary herself. Jarrett is seen by many as the real power behind the presidential throne. And Michelle and Jarrett do not like Hillary. Michelle pursued her catty vendetta against Hillary throughout; so behind the curtain, there was basically an epic catfight brewing in the federal government from 2008-2012.

Hubris and Arrogance: Hillary threw her weight around in an unseemly manner at the State Department. One staffer described her as acting like, “the boss of bosses, trying to intimidate everyone in sight,” which stood in opposition to pervious Secretaries of State, who “show a decent respect for the opinion of the permanent bureaucracy and ask for help to find their way around.” Women sometimes go overboard trying to assert their authority, and in doing so create a tense vibe....


http://www.americanthinker.com/arti..._insufferable_female_boss_.html#ixzz4F8AhXRfx

And The Donald is the temperamental one?
 
Back
Top