RoryN
You're screwed.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2003
- Posts
- 60,528
https://www.rt.com/usa/348500-stabbing-rally-sacramento-california/
Welp, there's your afternoon, politicos.
Welp, there's your afternoon, politicos.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you, op,
missed a golden opportunity,
to decry
the sale and distribution
of cutlery.
Let me get this right some right-wing whackadoodles were holding a rally as is their free speech right? You did learn about Skokie Illinois, right? When the left-wing wackadoodle Klan was marching in support of their racist agenda?
Can I assume they have the proper permits and everything? Gave the notice to the proper authorities that they plan on holding this rally to express their views?
Other people, not on the dance card showed up who do not agree with right-wing wackadoodle ideas and stabbings ensued?
Your headline suggests that this happened because they are right-wing whackadoodles is that about right?
What do you think the general public should do when right-wing wackadoodle started espousing their nonsense? Should they be ignored, shouted down, or stabbed?
When a riot ensues,, should the police look at who incited a riot or just simply assume that the words were what incited the riot and that the riot was of course justifiable based on the words?
The radio report I heard said the wackadoodles had proper permits and notices, the protesters did not.
Rallies like this are a danger to public safety. Everyone knows this, violence almost always breaks out. The municipality dropped the ball issuing the permits. When Hitler wannabes and fucktards walking around in white bed sheets stop promoting hatred and so stop antagonizing citizens in to vigilante actions, only then should they be allowed to hold public rallies.
Committees of vigilance have always played a part to administer law and order when government institutions fail to. The lack of checks and balances makes them prone to excessive acts though.
How many Americans died to defeat Adolph Hitler and his murdering bunch of psychopaths? How many innocent persons have the KKK lynched? If the government is not able or willing to administer justice then the people will.
If the local municipality had denied the permits in the name of public safety, this would not have happened.
Do you believe we citizens should be armed with guns in order to more effectively fight back against the Hitlers and KKKs of the world, especially when the government mistakenly allows said people to assemble? If not guns, what weapons are appropriate to use in the fight against "hate"?
Law and order.
If the government is not able or willing to administer justice then the people will.
.
I think it was radicalized gay Muslims who did the stabbings. That's the word on the street.
So you believe the "antifa" people who showed up to protest a lawfully sanctioned assembly in order to instigate violence were in the wrong? Your last post suggested otherwise, but perhaps I misunderstood you.
What did you mean by the people administering justice if the government doesn't?
No real surprise that you think that free speech and the right to bear arms should really only reside in the hands of those approved by government.
What about the areas where the majority of the residents and all the government officials espouse such racist views should they put down the views of for example La Raza?
You know,, so that their citizens are not forced to take action against the Mexicans?
'No real surprise that you think that free speech and the right to bear arms should really only reside in the hands of those approved by government.'
Of course. I live in a law and order country where we do need guns to protect ourselves. Not like I live in Afghanistan or Somalia.
'What about the areas where the majority of the residents and all the government officials espouse such racist views should they put down the views of for example La Raza?'
Never heard of La Raza. Where is this place near Mogadishu or Kandahar?
Up here in times of uncertainty we elected a solidly establishment government of the center. No right or left wing radicals. No populous politicians. We went back to the party which previous to the 90s had formed 70% of our governments.
Peace, order and good government.
I would suggest that the laws to ensure public safety are inadequate. Or that the municipality which should have denied the permits was wrong.
A law which allows Nazis, KKK and even NAMBLA types to stage rallies is wrong. A government that fails to ensure public safety is incompetent.
And that is when citizens take the law in to their own hands. Which itself is not right. But what choice remains? Allow Nazis, racists and kiddy diddlers to walk their city streets promoting their deviant views.
If Nazis, racist and diddlers are allowed to promote their deviancy then who is to be blamed? Those who take the law into their own hands or society and government at large for allowing it.
I thought you had decided to quietly abandon this sock puppet, Rob after bobbling your login while arguing in Mile's thread. I guess you decided to bull your way through then, as per usual?
Here let me save you some time.
This is where you pull out some statistics to show me about immigration and the percentage of minorities in various canadian cities.
I'll then point out that don't have much trouble with our Asians or Natives, either.
Ok then. Nice chatting with someone that knows all about the currently feckless KKK, but has never heard of the virulent La Raza.
Cool story bro.
Must be all that multi-culure diversity that you have that makes it such a charming, peaceful melting pot.
You do realize that everywhere in America that has your demographics has the same level of law and order? Why do you suppose that is?
Here's an idea: why don't you annex Detroit into Canada and go down there and teach them how to have law order and good government?
When the people take matters into their own hands against neo Nazio types, as in with this story, which weapons should be permissible? Can I use a gun to battle the next Hitler, if the government gives him a permit to preach hate?
Also, you are against the 1st amendment if people assemble for something terrible like racism and pedophilia. Who should decide whether a given assembly of people should be permissible?