Love that female privilege! No charges for mom in gorilla death.

What charges were you expecting? I know you were hoping none, so that you could start this whine thread, but what should she have been charged with? Losing track of a 3 year old in a busy place? If so, slap the handcuffs on me too.

Stop parenting our parents.
 
What charges were you expecting? I know you were hoping none, so that you could start this whine thread, but what should she have been charged with? Losing track of a 3 year old in a busy place? If so, slap the handcuffs on me too.

Stop parenting our parents.
Negligence?

That was a hella easy answer. Got any actual hard questions or was that the best your little mind could come up with?
 
What charges were you expecting? I know you were hoping none, so that you could start this whine thread, but what should she have been charged with? Losing track of a 3 year old in a busy place? If so, slap the handcuffs on me too.

Stop parenting our parents.

Unfortunately, as this case proves, someone has to parent the parents these days because they're not doing it.

People are fond of saying 'kids these days' well for me its "parents these days" so fucking busy on their phone, so caught up in who just liked their latest lame FB post or how many people retweeted their tweet.

Always on the phone, the net, always 'connected' to everything but their fucking kid who be anywhere, doing anything and if they manage not to get killed, they simply turn into undisciplined little animals.

But taking that into consideration, I am sure the mother has been shamed all over the internet and that is a fate worse than prison for a lemming like her.
 
Negligence?

This in no way meets anywhere near the legal definition of negligence

in order to have been the mother would have had to willfully put the child in a situation where harm could come to the child.. and since the zoo had put in precautions to prevent people from getting into the enclosure; the mother would be even less likely to be charged with negligence as their was an expectation of safety

otherwise anytime a child was hurt, it would bring up legal charges.. stub their toe? negligence! put their hand on the stove? negligence!

if the mother decided to let the kid into the enclosure to play with the gorillas.. that would be negligence


if this had been a father, he also would not be charged with negligence

but hey, you needed some sort of kind " women are evil " thread today, too bad that was

the best my little mind could come up with
 
What charges were you expecting? I know you were hoping none, so that you could start this whine thread, but what should she have been charged with? Losing track of a 3 year old in a busy place? If so, slap the handcuffs on me too.

Stop parenting our parents.


High sigh, nice to see you again.

I blame the 4 year old for not having the sense to recognize danger.
 
Negligence?

That was a hella easy answer. Got any actual hard questions or was that the best your little mind could come up with?

For turning her head for a minute? Negligence? I know she's a woman, but even a woman doesn't deserve to be charged with negligence in this case. Negligence is for leaving a kid in the car while you go into the tavern for a few, not for losing sight of one kid when you bend down to tie the shoe of another.

Obviously my question wasn't easy enough. Sorry about that.
 
Failure to keep a reasonable level of control of your kid which resulted in their life being put in serious danger.

still not grounds ... otherwise you could go to jail if your kid ran into traffic while you were at work and they were at school
 
For turning her head for a minute? Negligence? I know she's a woman, but even a woman doesn't deserve to be charged with negligence in this case. Negligence is for leaving a kid in the car while you go into the tavern for a few, not for losing sight of one kid when you bend down to tie the shoe of another.

Obviously my question wasn't easy enough. Sorry about that.

it's the " woman is always to blame " legal argument
 
High sigh, nice to see you again.

I blame the 4 year old for not having the sense to recognize danger.

I blame nobody, but the zoo is liable.

Nice to see you too, gc. It's been a long time.
 
Failure to keep a reasonable level of control of your kid which resulted in their life being put in serious danger.


Pretty much.

Having one kid scamper off while tying the shoe of another is not only reasonable, but virtually expected during the kid-raising years. And it has nothing to do with "today's parents" or "today's kids". It's just about parents with kids.
 
For turning her head for a minute? Negligence? I know she's a woman, but even a woman doesn't deserve to be charged with negligence in this case.
Even a woman? If this had been a dude he'd be in fucking irons by now. There's 500,000 signatures calling for this mother to go to jail - had it been a dad you know damned well it'd be an order of fucking magnitude more signatures. Mother fucker please, I bitch about dudes getting weak sentences for crimes, and this week wasn't even the first or second time I've done that, so don't try to turn this into "even a woman" bullshit. Privilege is fucking privilege and refusal to pursue this one is a case of privilege.

Lie to yourself about this shit but don't lie to me. All this talk is going to turn on its head the moment some kid runs out in the street and causes a pileup while their dad is "tying the other kid's shoe laces."

All I want is for women to be judged in the same way as men. Women get less time in jail than men for the same crimes - you know, like white people vs blacks. And they often don't even get charged as often for the same crimes. Just like whites. In fact if you're going to do something wrong and hope to get away with it, it is common knowledge - it's better to be white or female than black or (especially and) male. Hell, even black women often get lower sentences than white men... to say nothing of black men who get the very worst of it.

Only a fucking feminist can take a complaint about law enforcement leniency for women and turn it into a special war on women. No, wait, white supremacists do the same thing when liberals call for equal enforcement. Sillyme.

Negligence is for leaving a kid in the car while you go into the tavern for a few, not for losing sight of one kid when you bend down to tie the shoe of another.

Obviously my question wasn't easy enough. Sorry about that.
I have FOUR KIDS including one highly kinetic son and I manage to keep control of them when we go to a place like the zoo. Hell, we went out of town to several places this weekend and I had them to myself three out of about seven times and I managed to keep them in line. I have been to zoos of that type several times, one time just myself and the kids, and all four kids wanted to hug the fucking animals, but they didn't get to rush the cage like that.

If I can manage it, shouldn't anyone be able to? Well? Shouldn't they?

I thought men were the more incompetent parents according to you people. Are you less competent of a parent than, of all people, Mr. Literotica's Most Despised? Say it isn't so! :eek:
 
Gotta give the dumbass credit, he can make an argument against feminism out of anything. Clearly no idea what it's like to have kids but I think we all already knew that.
 
LT, please show me a case of negligence that's been successfully prosecuted when the only factor of negligence is that the parent lost track of a kid for less than a minute. Male or female, I don't care. Like you do with everything, you're trying to build this into a man versus woman thing. I'm saying that nobody should ever be prosecuted for something like this. I'd say the same thing if it were a dad.
 
Should have shot the kid to protect the gorilla. After all, there are over 7 billion people on the planet and just over 100,000 gorillas, of all types, worldwide.

I think we could stand to lose a stupid human or two especially since we're the ones decimating their population.
 
I don't buy that she was 'bending down' to tie a shoe lace.
You've seen her right? There's no way she could bend that far... Or at all.
 
I see a lot of entitled, lazy, irresponsible losers making excuses for terrible parents and neglect.

The child should be taken, the mother executed, and the family sued to pay for the dead gorilla.
 
I see a lot of entitled, lazy, irresponsible losers making excuses for terrible parents and neglect.

The child should be taken, the mother executed, and the family sued to pay for the dead gorilla.

Can't execute the mother. She brings in family income as daycare administrator.
That would leave no money to pay for the gorilla.
 
How the fuck did the child end up in the gorilla pen?

Did it happen intentionally or accidentally?

And couldn't they have just tranquilized the gorilla instead of shooting it?

High-powered tranq darts made for sedating large animals act very fast, and some can even put out an elephant.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top