Transgendereism

I am deadly serious. I believe the trans-children push is meant to lead to acceptance of pedophilia. That we aren't sticking to discussing adults is no accident. And I started reading "just because he is a pedophile doesn't mean he is a bad person" think pieces in the media 2 years ago. Those think pieces prime the public. I predicted the transmania 4-5 years ago (and posted about it on Lit 2 years ago) based on the same observations.

And everyone on this thread defending the Trans agenda will be arguing about how pedophiles aren't bad, pro "cross generational love" etc in a few years. Bookmark this. People are easily manipulated, especially when you present getting on board with an agenda as Virtuous.

Eta: I myself have been manipulated on social issues too. But now I see what they did there.

I reference Fritz Perls MD all the time. ITS ONE THING TO WANNA BE LIKE NAPOLEON AND INSANITY TO SAY 'I AM NAPOLEON.'
 
Why are all the bizarre sexual practices primarily geared towards men?

I'm so tired of the Perversions of the Patriarchy!
 
I am deadly serious. I believe the trans-children push is meant to lead to acceptance of pedophilia. That we aren't sticking to discussing adults is no accident. And I started reading "just because he is a pedophile doesn't mean he is a bad person" think pieces in the media 2 years ago. Those think pieces prime the public. I predicted the transmania 4-5 years ago (and posted about it on Lit 2 years ago) based on the same observations.

And everyone on this thread defending the Trans agenda will be arguing about how pedophiles aren't bad, pro "cross generational love" etc in a few years. Bookmark this. People are easily manipulated, especially when you present getting on board with an agenda as Virtuous.

Eta: I myself have been manipulated on social issues too. But now I see what they did there.

I don't agree with you on the pedophilia thing.

But I agree with you on other points, in that something went seriously wrong in a system that allows politicians and schools to make such unillateral decisions without consulting psychologists or health professionals:

"Now children as young as FOUR are asked to choose what gender they are before they start school"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ng-FOUR-asked-choose-gender-start-school.html
^^^^
I'm not even mentioning the arguments against such an ill-thought and dangerous decision, because they're glaringly obvious.
 
Quoting the Daily Mail is like quoting Hitler.
Paedophiles should be used as a source of cheap fuel.

There's my two cents.
 
Quoting the Daily Mail is like quoting Hitler.
Paedophiles should be used as a source of cheap fuel.

There's my two cents.

Leaving the source aside, what do you think of the school's decision?
This is from theguardian:

"Brighton & Hove infants asked to choose gender on primary school form
Thousands of parents invited by council to support the selection that their children would ‘most identify with’"
http://www.theguardian.com/society/...asked-to-choose-gender-on-primary-school-form
 
Last edited:
I don't agree with you on the pedophilia thing.

But I agree with you on other points, in that something went seriously wrong in a system that allows politicians and schools to make such unillateral decisions without consulting psychologists or health professionals:

"Now children as young as FOUR are asked to choose what gender they are before they start school"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ng-FOUR-asked-choose-gender-start-school.html
^^^^
I'm not even mentioning the arguments against such an ill-thought and dangerous decision, because they're glaringly obvious.

Time will tell on my pedo prediction. Hopefully I am wrong, but I would bet money that I am correct. The whole trans debate should be centered solely on adults as we can all certainly agree that adults can do whatever the hell they want. But that it's so heavily weighed towards children certainly isn't an accident. And no, the arguments against this are not glaringly obvious. The time for you to speak up is now, not after its too late. If you point out the obvious, you will be attacked. Are you ready?

If a four year is asked to choose a gender, s/he can be asked to choose a sexual practice. If s/he can consent to altering genitals/hormones, s/he can consent to sex. One does not make sense without the other.
 
One more time. Believing that you are something that you demonstrably and scientifically are not IS a mental disorder. It demands treatment of the individual living in a fantasy, not concessions on the part of those that don't live in a fantasy.

Ishmael

I think I can play major league baseball, hit 463, 210 RBI, 110 HR and sign a guaranteed two year $300,000,00.00 contract.

It's all about equal rights and fairness. One of the teams will have to sign me.
 
One more time. Believing that you are something that you demonstrably and scientifically are not IS a mental disorder. It demands treatment of the individual living in a fantasy, not concessions on the part of those that don't live in a fantasy.

Ishmael

I'd love to hear what you're conceding.
 
I just came here to look at LadyF ass. And I posted because I want her to know it.
 
1.The whole trans debate should be centered solely on adults as we can all certainly agree that adults can do whatever the hell they want. And no, the arguments against this are not glaringly obvious.

2.But that it's so heavily weighed towards children certainly isn't an accident.
If a four year is asked to choose a gender, s/he can be asked to choose a sexual practice. If s/he can consent to altering genitals/hormones, s/he can consent to sex. One does not make sense without the other.
1.My main argument lies in the fact that there have been and continue to be cases of people who were misdiagnosed as having GID.

- If people who are trained and skilled in this specific an area can go wrong, can you imagine the politicians and schools, who operate without any oversight from the appropriate professional bodies!
The way they educate people about GID is dumb and leading & it puts ideas into people's head. Let alone kids who by their nature are impressionable. Because some parents are impressionable too, or some have a lower IQ or are misinformed.

- And we're talking about a "condition" (not sure what the PC word is for GID) for which therapy is invasive with potentially severe side effects. Absolute disaster if someone gets misdiagnosed and treated for GID.

2.I still disagree with you on the paedophilia thing.
But damn, how you're able to come up with arguments that give some credibility to an idea that initially sounded outlandish to me.
 
Children that are bullied usually turn out to be trannies, they now say.

Used to be they were poofs.

Have poofters gone upmarket...again?
 
1.My main argument lies in the fact that there have been and continue to be cases of people who were misdiagnosed as having GID.

- If people who are trained and skilled in this specific an area can go wrong, can you imagine the politicians and schools, who operate without any oversight from the appropriate professional bodies!
The way they educate people about GID is dumb and leading & it puts ideas into people's head. Let alone kids who by their nature are impressionable. Because some parents are impressionable too, or some have a lower IQ or are misinformed.

- And we're talking about a "condition" (not sure what the PC word is for GID) for which therapy is invasive with potentially severe side effects. Absolute disaster if someone gets misdiagnosed and treated for GID.

2.I still disagree with you on the paedophilia thing.
But damn, how you're able to come up with arguments that give some credibility to an idea that initially sounded outlandish to me.

Excellent argument, not easily refuted by emotions or quicky links.

Back to the pedo thing. My ears always perk up when our language changes. Changing someone's language is the fastest way to change they way they think. I saw it with the word "gender" though I didn't understand what was happening at the time.

"Pedophilia" is being redefined as a sexual orientation instead of a disorder. (We have seen this before of course, with homosexuality.) Some people seem to be following that same blueprint, but the outcome will of course be destructive.

Again, look for soft pieces in the media. Ones you really don't notice, nor are you meant to notice. Instead they slowly seep into your consiciousness until one day you wake up and proclaim it to be fact (and attack those who disagree.)

Here are examples of soft think pieces in mainstream media outlets. They aren't definitively claiming anything... yet. They just seek to influence your opinion slowly over time.

LA Times: Many experts now view pedophilia as a sexual orientation
(Who are these experts? Why aren't they named?)

Toronto Star: Is pedophilia a sexual orientation?
(Once again, it's just a question. But note this quote in the article: Cantor’s research has greatly influenced the view among researchers that pedophilia has a biological basis. This is how theories spread whether they are proven or not. This Dr. Cantor is likely behind a large number of artlcles whether he is named or not. Why?

Gawker: clickbait site, known to be a place one can float false information in order to get it into the national consciousness. Born This Way: Sympathy and Science for Those Who Want to Have Sex with Children

WeMD: For reasons unknown this is a go-to site for people seeking medical information. Let's see how they define the term. What Is Pedophilia?
"A pedophile is a person who has a sustained sexual orientation toward children, generally aged 13 or younger, Blanchard says."

I could kep going, but this is enough to show what I mean.
 
1.My main argument lies in the fact that there have been and continue to be cases of people who were misdiagnosed as having GID.

- If people who are trained and skilled in this specific an area can go wrong, can you imagine the politicians and schools, who operate without any oversight from the appropriate professional bodies!
The way they educate people about GID is dumb and leading & it puts ideas into people's head. Let alone kids who by their nature are impressionable. Because some parents are impressionable too, or some have a lower IQ or are misinformed.

- And we're talking about a "condition" (not sure what the PC word is for GID) for which therapy is invasive with potentially severe side effects. Absolute disaster if someone gets misdiagnosed and treated for GID.

2.I still disagree with you on the paedophilia thing.
But damn, how you're able to come up with arguments that give some credibility to an idea that initially sounded outlandish to me.

In the past GID came along after obstetricians amputated penises during circumcision. The MDs removed the wound and testicles and told the parents to raise Johnny as Jill. So there was usually gender and sexual incongruence. He kinda resembled a girl but wasn't a girl.
 
Time will tell on my pedo prediction. Hopefully I am wrong, but I would bet money that I am correct. The whole trans debate should be centered solely on adults as we can all certainly agree that adults can do whatever the hell they want. But that it's so heavily weighed towards children certainly isn't an accident. And no, the arguments against this are not glaringly obvious. The time for you to speak up is now, not after its too late. If you point out the obvious, you will be attacked. Are you ready?

If a four year is asked to choose a gender, s/he can be asked to choose a sexual practice. If s/he can consent to altering genitals/hormones, s/he can consent to sex. One does not make sense without the other.

You are.

Ishmael
 
We talked about this back in 2003 in a thread about NAMBLA....the media is now pitching it as a gender preference, more than ever.
 
Back
Top