Litiquette IV

Which of the following is the most likely reason you post in a thread

  • Thread title

    Votes: 36 14.5%
  • Thread topic

    Votes: 141 56.9%
  • Who recently posted

    Votes: 22 8.9%
  • What was recently posted

    Votes: 44 17.7%
  • Who the OP is

    Votes: 5 2.0%

  • Total voters
    248
Status
Not open for further replies.
I do, too.

How can it not be me?

Oh my. This is something troubling.

I appreciate your clever name choice. I would have gone with that. So you get points there.

However, your trolling leaves much to be desired. A little more snark. A little more imitation of Papa C. I just feel like you're missing it.

#HandsOffMyBrand
 
Oh my. This is something troubling.

I appreciate your clever name choice. I would have gone with that. So you get points there.

However, your trolling leaves much to be desired. A little more snark. A little more imitation of Papa C. I just feel like you're missing it.

#HandsOffMyBrand

Ah...but don't we think that one of us could be vitriolic (that's a word we'd use, right?), while the other dabbled in subtlety? Why should both of us poke the OP in the eye? So, why not create a persona that would be close to the real dude, then you could go on being a bit snarky and you could ... I mean I could ;) ;) pose questions and post like the real guy would post.

This way...maybe the frequenters of this thread would think that hmmmm....I wonder if it is Lord Pmann? Or maybe it's the Lord and Master himself playing a prank on everybody. Or could it be someone else?
 
Evening followup question.

When you believe in superstitions and you're sitting on the couch with the same shirt, same undergarments and in the same sport that you've sat on while your team went on a huge winning streak. And then a miracle happens. A person you're interested in having sex with comes over to watch the game with you. At half time, your team is up by 27 points. So you give in. You have sex while Terry Bradshaw is ranting on with the other in studio guys. Then the worst thing that could happen happens - your team loses in the final seconds on a fumble return for a touchdown and a blown call by the official.

How quickly do you kick that person you had sex with to the curb?
 
Evening followup question.

When you believe in superstitions and you're sitting on the couch with the same shirt, same undergarments and in the same sport that you've sat on while your team went on a huge winning streak. And then a miracle happens. A person you're interested in having sex with comes over to watch the game with you. At half time, your team is up by 27 points. So you give in. You have sex while Terry Bradshaw is ranting on with the other in studio guys. Then the worst thing that could happen happens - your team loses in the final seconds on a fumble return for a touchdown and a blown call by the official.

How quickly do you kick that person you had sex with to the curb?
Yeah, I've completely changed my mind.

Pmann would put all of that ^^^ in croquet terms. Football? Pfffft, he thinks it is for peasants! And I'm pretty sure he has no idea who Terry Bradshaw is.

So this is a DOUBLE imposter. *dun dun DUH!!!!*

Beware ladies.
 
Ah...but don't we think that one of us could be vitriolic (that's a word we'd use, right?), while the other dabbled in subtlety? Why should both of us poke the OP in the eye? So, why not create a persona that would be close to the real dude, then you could go on being a bit snarky and you could ... I mean I could ;) ;) pose questions and post like the real guy would post.

This way...maybe the frequenters of this thread would think that hmmmm....I wonder if it is Lord Pmann? Or maybe it's the Lord and Master himself playing a prank on everybody. Or could it be someone else?

Neither Chained nor Pmann would ever use a double winky face. But you keep trying.

Also football questions are boring. But you keep trying! :kiss:

Yeah, I've completely changed my mind.

Pmann would put all of that ^^^ in croquet terms. Football? Pfffft, he thinks it is for peasants! And I'm pretty sure he has no idea who Terry Bradshaw is.

So this is a DOUBLE imposter. *dun dun DUH!!!!*

Beware ladies.

Agreed, Suz.

Soooo this is a semi-almost-fun-but-also-creepy game of "guess the alt" ... I kinda wish it was Pmann coz if it was? My sides would be sore by now.
 
Yeah, I've completely changed my mind.

Pmann would put all of that ^^^ in croquet terms. Football? Pfffft, he thinks it is for peasants! And I'm pretty sure he has no idea who Terry Bradshaw is.

So this is a DOUBLE imposter. *dun dun DUH!!!!*

Beware ladies.

Totally agree with Suz_anne!

A Pmann alt would have more...flair. Just sayin'. :D
 
Going old school today and going to ask an actual Litiequette type question. I'll take no credit as this was asked of me so I thought I'd bring it to the group. In the "person above me threads" if someone is mentioned by name in the response, is it okay to reply to them even when it requires breaking the sequence of the thread?

My advice would be to post a double reply, one to address the post you want to and then a second one to keep the flow of the room. Or should you just PM the person because the moment has passed?
 
Do the quote multiple posts option and answer the post you want to answer and then answer the actual post above you as per the threads game/flow.

OR

Just do whatever the fuck you want because it's just a forum.

Do I sense disdain for decorum?
 
Then for the more serious amongst us ;)

Procrastination. I've never quite understood it. I get that doing something you'd rather not isn't exactly pleasant but doesn't pushing it off until later just prolong the misery? Why have it loom over you when the other option is to push through it, get it over with and move on. Then again, I like to rip the band-aid right off.
 
Yeah, I've completely changed my mind.

Pmann would put all of that ^^^ in croquet terms. Football? Pfffft, he thinks it is for peasants! And I'm pretty sure he has no idea who Terry Bradshaw is.

So this is a DOUBLE imposter. *dun dun DUH!!!!*

Beware ladies.

I agree. I would hardly use football as an analogy. Ugh. Classless. I bet this motherfucker gets his caviar from Iceland. Just gross.

I can't post in here today, I'm going to be busy with my thread outing all of pmann's shitty alts. Starting with ChainerUp and Mikesaysmaybe.

A shiny AIDS dick for you...


Damn she looks hot in that gif. She's so trashy, but I think she's hot as hell.

Totally agree with Suz_anne!

A Pmann alt would have more...flair. Just sayin'. :D

Totally. I wouldn't be so fucking lame. My posts would have way more pizzazz and awesomeness.

Normally I wouldn't acknowledge such an alt. But I really feel like I need to do damage control before my lovely name gets smeared.
 
Going old school today and going to ask an actual Litiequette type question. I'll take no credit as this was asked of me so I thought I'd bring it to the group. In the "person above me threads" if someone is mentioned by name in the response, is it okay to reply to them even when it requires breaking the sequence of the thread?

My advice would be to post a double reply, one to address the post you want to and then a second one to keep the flow of the room. Or should you just PM the person because the moment has passed?

People shouldn't get their knickers in a bunch over that. Because those threads are laaaaaaaame most of the time and it's like 9 guys tripping over their dicks to try to post after a girl.


Then for the more serious amongst us ;)

Procrastination. I've never quite understood it. I get that doing something you'd rather not isn't exactly pleasant but doesn't pushing it off until later just prolong the misery? Why have it loom over you when the other option is to push through it, get it over with and move on. Then again, I like to rip the band-aid right off.

I don't like procrastinating. Let's get this shit done and completed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top