C
ChainerUp
Guest
Methinks Pmann protests too much.![]()
I do, too.
How can it not be me?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Methinks Pmann protests too much.![]()
I do, too.
How can it not be me?
*nods*Methinks Pmann protests too much.![]()
I do, too.
How can it not be me?
Oh my. This is something troubling.
I appreciate your clever name choice. I would have gone with that. So you get points there.
However, your trolling leaves much to be desired. A little more snark. A little more imitation of Papa C. I just feel like you're missing it.
#HandsOffMyBrand
Yeah, I've completely changed my mind.Evening followup question.
When you believe in superstitions and you're sitting on the couch with the same shirt, same undergarments and in the same sport that you've sat on while your team went on a huge winning streak. And then a miracle happens. A person you're interested in having sex with comes over to watch the game with you. At half time, your team is up by 27 points. So you give in. You have sex while Terry Bradshaw is ranting on with the other in studio guys. Then the worst thing that could happen happens - your team loses in the final seconds on a fumble return for a touchdown and a blown call by the official.
How quickly do you kick that person you had sex with to the curb?
I can't post in here today, I'm going to be busy with my thread outing all of pmann's shitty alts. Starting with ChainerUp and Mikesaysmaybe.
Ah...but don't we think that one of us could be vitriolic (that's a word we'd use, right?), while the other dabbled in subtlety? Why should both of us poke the OP in the eye? So, why not create a persona that would be close to the real dude, then you could go on being a bit snarky and you could ... I mean I could![]()
pose questions and post like the real guy would post.
This way...maybe the frequenters of this thread would think that hmmmm....I wonder if it is Lord Pmann? Or maybe it's the Lord and Master himself playing a prank on everybody. Or could it be someone else?

Yeah, I've completely changed my mind.
Pmann would put all of that ^^^ in croquet terms. Football? Pfffft, he thinks it is for peasants! And I'm pretty sure he has no idea who Terry Bradshaw is.
So this is a DOUBLE imposter. *dun dun DUH!!!!*
Beware ladies.
You've only got 5000 posts.

http://mashable.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/The-Voice.gifI can't post in here today, I'm going to be busy with my thread outing all of pmann's shitty alts. Starting with ChainerUp and Mikesaysmaybe.
I've had 40 minutes sleep. Don't come at me with your mathemagics.
Yeah, I've completely changed my mind.
Pmann would put all of that ^^^ in croquet terms. Football? Pfffft, he thinks it is for peasants! And I'm pretty sure he has no idea who Terry Bradshaw is.
So this is a DOUBLE imposter. *dun dun DUH!!!!*
Beware ladies.

I would never use the word "vitriolic"
I couldn't even spell it without looking
I've always thought that word sounds like a drunk who only consumes vodka.
*ponders how that's physiologically possible*totally not me.
vodka makes my thighs hurt
Do the quote multiple posts option and answer the post you want to answer and then answer the actual post above you as per the threads game/flow.
OR
Just do whatever the fuck you want because it's just a forum.
Yeah, I've completely changed my mind.
Pmann would put all of that ^^^ in croquet terms. Football? Pfffft, he thinks it is for peasants! And I'm pretty sure he has no idea who Terry Bradshaw is.
So this is a DOUBLE imposter. *dun dun DUH!!!!*
Beware ladies.
I can't post in here today, I'm going to be busy with my thread outing all of pmann's shitty alts. Starting with ChainerUp and Mikesaysmaybe.
Totally agree with Suz_anne!
A Pmann alt would have more...flair. Just sayin'.![]()
Going old school today and going to ask an actual Litiequette type question. I'll take no credit as this was asked of me so I thought I'd bring it to the group. In the "person above me threads" if someone is mentioned by name in the response, is it okay to reply to them even when it requires breaking the sequence of the thread?
My advice would be to post a double reply, one to address the post you want to and then a second one to keep the flow of the room. Or should you just PM the person because the moment has passed?
Then for the more serious amongst us
Procrastination. I've never quite understood it. I get that doing something you'd rather not isn't exactly pleasant but doesn't pushing it off until later just prolong the misery? Why have it loom over you when the other option is to push through it, get it over with and move on. Then again, I like to rip the band-aid right off.