Slut Shaming

[Fata Morgana]

Nope. Nothing to do with your "politics".
I started trolling you after seeing how much fun Ann was having with that, in the Vasectomy thread - which You kept bumping up for that purpose, silly.

EDIT.
How would you know that I keep quoting you if you have me on iggy?

So you admit you copy everything Fake Cancer Boy does?

 

[Lyricalli]

I thought the threadstarter was the stupidest person in here. I hate being wrong.

The difference being that the thread starter was trying to start shit. This other person seems entirely sincere, which is so much worse.

 

[Lyricalli]

"I'm off the thread" means for now, not for eternity, bozo.

"I'm off the thread" is a definitive statement. There is nothing in it that implies "for now". The only reason there is a "for now" attached to it is your inability to resist coming back. We know you never mean "for now" when you write it. It's sad that you're attempting to pretend otherwise.

 

[Saint Peter]

I am off the booze






















for now

 

[Jennifer]

I am off the booze






















for now

This thread put me back on it. *Throws 24 hour sobriety chip into garbage*

 

[IrezumiKiss]

This thread put me back on it. *Throws 24 hour sobriety chip into garbage*

https://mattsko.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/cary-drink-gif.gif

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Shame on slut shamers. Sluts are to be cherished.

 

[Mr_Jon_Thon]

At the very least, shared.

 

[Recidiva]

I kinda take issue with 'enjoy freedom of speech' as an ideal here.

You enjoy it by having it and not being dragged to prison for saying something by the government.

However, if you say something so very self serving and criminally stupid, you get what you get.

It amazes me how "You should not be offended by my opinion!" is an opinion mostly held by people truly intending to do offense and not wanting to be called on it.

 

[Lancecastor]

I prefer mine primarily natural, with a hint o slut.

 

[bronzeage]

The question should be asked of the woman on WHY she was wearing an outfit that would attract that kind of attention. Did the woman deserve to be raped...no...but she did NOTHING to stop it from happening by wearing an outfit that made her look like she was up for anything and even helped it to happen by wearing an outfit that advertised something she obviously didn't want someone answering the ad to. Woman have the right to be sexy....but when a woman goes all "Kardashian" and something like this happens then she has to take some of the blame for advertising her body in an outfit she knew would attract attention. Being sexy is ok...being a slut should be shamed.

Why did you pick some woman's pic for your av?

 

[FGB]

This is really simple.

Women can and should be able to wear whatever the fuck they want and not be raped.

The end.

I grew up in the sixties and seventies.

Ha! some of the clothes worn on some females back then would give a dead man a hard on, but rarely did a rape take place...

It is not the clothes or the gender even, it is the Morals and the metrics people use to measure them with.

 

[Saint Peter]

I grew up in the sixties and seventies.

Ha! some of the clothes worn on some females back then would give a dead man a hard on, but rarely did a rape take place...

It is not the clothes or the gender even, it is the Morals and the metrics people use to measure them with.

Why did you pick some weirdo's pic for your av?

 

[Sean]

I grew up in the sixties and seventies.

Ha! some of the clothes worn on some females back then would give a dead man a hard on, but rarely did a rape take place...

It is not the clothes or the gender even, it is the Morals and the metrics people use to measure them with.

What?

 

[Recidiva]

I grew up in the sixties and seventies.

Ha! some of the clothes worn on some females back then would give a dead man a hard on, but rarely did a rape take place...

It is not the clothes or the gender even, it is the Morals and the metrics people use to measure them with.

No. Just no.

It wasn't a defined crime, it was blamed on the women. Guess why? Because slut shaming is a terribly useful legal concept.

"Rape is the most underreported crime in America. Significant changes to improve the treatment of sexual assault victims have occurred in the last two decades. The impact of reforms, led by the women's movement, can be seen in the legal, mental health, medical, and victim services arenas.

During the 1970s, the first rape crisis center was established. The treatment of victims in the criminal justice system was questioned, and hundreds of laws were passed to protect rape victims in the courts. Medical protocols have been developed and widely accepted. The mental health impact of rape is well documented in the literature, and the practices of mental health professionals have improved.

Although the treatment of rape victims today is vastly different from three decades ago, many victims still do not receive the assistance and treatment they need"

 

[bronzeage]

I grew up in the sixties and seventies.

Ha! some of the clothes worn on some females back then would give a dead man a hard on, but rarely did a rape take place...

It is not the clothes or the gender even, it is the Morals and the metrics people use to measure them with.

I don't know why you think rape was rare in the 60's and 70's. I was there and that's not my impression.

If there's any real difference, we have expanded the definition of rape to include the threat of violence, instead of that unless the victim came away injured, she wanted it because she didn't fight hard enough.

 

[FGB]

Why did you pick some weirdo's pic for your av?

It's the only one I could find in the mirror...

 

[Lancecastor]

http://g02.a.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1GoFfLXXXXXawXVXXq6xXFXXXY/Denim-font-b-Shorts-b-font-Women-Jeans-font-b-short-b-font-feminino-Fipped-Sexy.jpg

In the 1970s, grrls routinely dressed like this.

More rapes then or now, i wonder?

 

[Recidiva]

http://g02.a.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1GoFfLXXXXXawXVXXq6xXFXXXY/Denim-font-b-Shorts-b-font-Women-Jeans-font-b-short-b-font-feminino-Fipped-Sexy.jpg

In the 1970s, grrls routinely dressed like this.

More rapes then or now, i wonder?

She's lovely.

That's disrespectful to the flag.

Plus, ew.

Hannibal Lecter: First principles, Clarice. Simplicity. Read Marcus Aurelius. Of each particular thing ask: what is it in itself? What is its nature? What does he do, this man you seek?

Clarice Starling: He kills women...

Hannibal Lecter: No. That is incidental. What is the first and principal thing he does? What needs does he serve by killing?

Clarice Starling: Anger, um, social acceptance, and, huh, sexual frustrations, sir...

Hannibal Lecter: No! He covets. That is his nature. And how do we begin to covet, Clarice? Do we seek out things to covet? Make an effort to answer now.

Clarice Starling: No. We just...

Hannibal Lecter: No. We begin by coveting what we see every day. Don't you feel eyes moving over your body, Clarice? And don't your eyes seek out the things you want?

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Ha! some of the clothes worn by some women back then would

http://i.imgur.com/UzVsPHa.gif

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-exbmhp2J5No/VkURVZuWBbI/AAAAAAACt_U/BIoP8UOT3JQ/w426-h320/15%2B-%2B1

 

[Lancecastor]

She's lovely.

That's disrespectful to the flag.

Plus, ew.

Hannibal Lecter: First principles, Clarice. Simplicity. Read Marcus Aurelius. Of each particular thing ask: what is it in itself? What is its nature? What does he do, this man you seek?

Clarice Starling: He kills women...

Hannibal Lecter: No. That is incidental. What is the first and principal thing he does? What needs does he serve by killing?

Clarice Starling: Anger, um, social acceptance, and, huh, sexual frustrations, sir...

Hannibal Lecter: No! He covets. That is his nature. And how do we begin to covet, Clarice? Do we seek out things to covet? Make an effort to answer now.

Clarice Starling: No. We just...

Hannibal Lecter: No. We begin by coveting what we see every day. Don't you feel eyes moving over your body, Clarice? And don't your eyes seek out the things you want?

Someone's amped up tonite, eh?

Going to the hockey game, cant stay, but it was a real question, and i dont know the answer.

 

[Recidiva]

Someone's amped up tonite, eh?

Going to the hockey game, cant stay, but it was a real question, and i dont know the answer.

I come pre-amped, just add issue.

It wasn't a real question.

Enjoy the hockey game!

 

[Aella_]

Just adding some arguments to why some might consider the OP's statement to be dumb (intentionally -shit stirring- or not).

1.A large majority of (mostly underreported) rape crimes are committed by a person well-known to the victim.
2.Rape is often about power, not just sex.
3.As annoying and "look at me, I'm british" as I find Des, his argument about rape statistics in muslim countries was one of the best, imo.

 

[Jennifer]

Just adding another argument to why some might consider the OP's statement to be dumb (intentionally -shit stirring- or not).

1.A large majority of (mostly underreported) rape crimes are committed by a person well-known to the victim.
2.Rape is often about power, not just sex.

Rape is always about power. Christ.

 

[Aella_]

Rape is always about power. Christ.

We wouldn't know, would we? Only the perpetrators would.
((In a related line - I'm just quoting what I read on the net.))