Why anti-white racism is so central to post modern liberalism

renard_ruse

Break up Amazon
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Posts
16,094
White bashing, and in particular demographic bashing in general of groups they don't like, is central to post-modern liberalism (the ideology that runs all western societies today) because it is used as a "moral" justification for all other ideas, no matter how crazy or how extreme when first proposed.
 
Throw out "we're just fighting white "racism"" on any issue, even one with no rational connection to race or ethnicity, and it give "moral" justification for their position.

Sick, yes. Succesful strategy, apparently. The last 40 years pretty much shows that. So expect their negative obsession with whites, "white males", etc, to continue.

As Trump says, they "are not nice people." A bit of an understatement I would say.
 
Renard pushing the myth of the Persecuted White Guy.

You can find the handbook on the shelf right between "Racism for Dummies: How to pretend to be a victim of racism and/or sexism as a White male" and "Victimhood: How to claim that you're persecuted as a Christian in America because you can't force your beliefs onto everyone else".
 
Last edited:
White bashing, and in particular demographic bashing in general of groups they don't like, is central to post-modern liberalism (the ideology that runs all western societies today) because it is used as a "moral" justification for all other ideas, no matter how crazy or how extreme when first proposed.

Damn liberals, always bashing groups they don't like!
"There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what…These are people who pay no income tax.
My job is is not to worry about those people. I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives."
 
As an ideology, it seems to be singularly unsuccessful. Or do you honestly think, against all evidence, that white people are suffering in Western countries, compared with other groups?

in terms of galvanizing other ethnic groups into political action, its had some fair success

and if things continue on course, its possible that white guilt could arguably be considered to be the catalyst to global wealth redistribution
 
White bashing, and in particular demographic bashing in general of groups they don't like, is central to post-modern liberalism (the ideology that runs all western societies today) because it is used as a "moral" justification for all other ideas, no matter how crazy or how extreme when first proposed.

Not entirely true. If they cannot justify something by demographic bashing, then they do through "global warming."
 
in terms of galvanizing other ethnic groups into political action, its had some fair success

and if things continue on course, its possible that white guilt could arguably be considered to be the catalyst to global wealth redistribution

That would take a helluva a lot of work. Not impossible but there are simpler ways to acheive that goal.

Not entirely true. If they cannot justify something by demographic bashing, then they do through "global warming."

Pointing out facts isn't bashing and global warming is a fact.
 
Back
Top