Another perfect example of the Left's intolerance and opposition of free speech

Let me introduce you to our enlightened libs., Ubiquitious_too :

I'll start with SEAN :
The expressions "you're a moron" and "you're stupid" are like… the bread and butter of his posts, and make for most of his vocabulary.
If someone's right and he can't come up with an argument, what should one expect to hear ?.
"You're a moron", yes yes.

So you think Jen is right that the first amendment applies to private citizens?
 
Let me introduce you to our enlightened libs., Ubiquitious_too :

I'll start with SEAN :
The expressions "you're a moron" and "you're stupid" are like… the bread and butter of his posts, and make for most of his vocabulary.
If someone's right and he can't come up with an argument, what should one expect to hear ?.
"You're a moron", yes yes.

Contrary to Rory's uneducated belief, Freedom of speech applies among citizens as well; not just between the Government and the citizens. Now, if you don't know that you should get your brains out of your dicks, guys.
 
Jus when Ya thought hashfag couldn't be more of a uneducated 3rd world paki etal...He da gift dat keep on Givin brah!
 
Just a reminder for the morons:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
 
Trump didn't have his ability to speak abridged by the government, or by protesters. He did it himself, because he's a fucking coward!

His cult outnumbered the protesters, but Miles and others don't want to believe that, since that would mean they're backing a narcissistic megalomaniac with delusions of grandeur.
 
Contrary to Rory's uneducated belief, Freedom of speech applies among citizens as well; not just between the Government and the citizens. Now, if you don't know that you should get your brains out of your dicks, guys.

Absolutely untrue. You're embarrassing yourself.
 
Has anyone pointed out yet that the thread tile should be opposition TO free speech, not opposition OF free speech?

Just checking.
 
This thread started out with some informative posts with supporting links and all, but then it devolved as so many do, with claims becoming more outrageous and not a link in sight.
 
It amazes me that Trump supporters don't know what the First Amendment says. That Congress shall make no law... not a word about other private citizens shutting you down because you're a fucking twatcicle.

OK, I lied, it doesn't surprise me at all.
 
So your contention is that when someone says something ridiculously fucking stupid, they should be given a pass because they have a vagina?

What females have been run off since #### showed up? Any? If any, I'll assert that #### was the one who scared them off.
 
This thread started out with some informative posts with supporting links and all, but then it devolved as so many do, with claims becoming more outrageous and not a link in sight.
Links aren't needed when you know how to "google properly".
 
I see that you progressive doods managed to chase away another woman. Because she showed that she has more brains than all of you narcissistic assholes.
Well, obviously you know about these "thousands of court cases" so you can enlighten all of us "narcissistic assholes" with a citation.
Just one is enough.
 
"Last fall, Trump said a Black Lives Matter protester maybe “should have been roughed up.” And despite an announcement at the start of his rallies urging supporters not to be violent toward protesters, Trump in February urged his supporters to “knock the crap out of” anybody “getting ready to throw a tomato” and vowed to pay for their legal fees should they face charges.

“Knock the crap out of them, would you? Seriously. OK? Just knock the hell — I promise you, I will pay for the legal fees. I promise, I promise,” Trump said.

And Trump also said he personally wanted to punch a protester “in the face” during a rally in February."

http://www.reviewjournal.com/politics/elections/trump-we-ve-got-fight-back-video
 
Well, obviously you know about these "thousands of court cases" so you can enlighten all of us "narcissistic assholes" with a citation.
Just one is enough.

I don't understand a thing about what you guys are talking about in here. My knowledge in law is 0.
I was just trolling because I can't stand certain narcissistic douchebags from this thread (not referring to you and a few other posters, of course).
 
Last edited:
The First Amendment has been interpreted by the Court as applying to the entire federal government even though it is only expressly applicable to Congress. Furthermore, the Court has interpreted, the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in the First Amendment from interference by state governments. See U.S. Const. amend. XIV.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/first_amendment

I'll keep looking for the amendment extending the protection to interference by private individuals.
 
Contrary to Rory's uneducated belief, Freedom of speech applies among citizens as well; not just between the Government and the citizens. Now, if you don't know that you should get your brains out of your dicks, guys.

No. It really does not.

The 1st Amendment restricts the federal government from interfering with speech rights.

Through the 14th Amendment, it restricts state governments from interfering with speech rights.

Governments can promulgate reasonable restrictions on speech. Defamation laws are one example. Even then, though, they are limited by the 1st Amendment.
 
No. It really does not.

The 1st Amendment restricts the federal government from interfering with speech rights.

Through the 14th Amendment, it restricts state governments from interfering with speech rights.

Governments can promulgate reasonable restrictions on speech. Defamation laws are one example. Even then, though, they are limited by the 1st Amendment.

You do realise you're trying to educate Jen?
 
The media along with the GOP candidates are trying to turn this ass backwards and make Trump out to be the bad guy. Its the most unbelievable thing I've ever seen them try. Beats their efforts to claim the Sochi Olympics were a failure, which was probably the previously most ridiculous crap they ever came up with.

Blaming Trump for the behavior of people who come to disrupt, disrespect, and shut down his speeches is the exact same as blaming a rape victim for being raped because she wore a skimpy dress.

The GOP candidates blaming Trump instead of condemning the criminals and rioters who are attacking him is not excusable. The GOP needs to disappear and quickly. Its a complete garbage party. Time for a new centrist pro-America Trump party.
 
Blaming Trump for the behavior of people who come to disrupt, disrespect, and shut down his speeches is the exact same as blaming a rape victim for being raped because she wore a skimpy dress.

And the hits just keep on comin'. :D
 
Back
Top