Incorrect. See my earlier Wiki post.
Geezus.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Incorrect. See my earlier Wiki post.
Allah Akbar to you ISIS Daddy.
Incorrect. See my earlier Wiki post. Most scholars believe that an itinerant preacher from Nazareth did exist and was executed by the Romans on the advise of Jewish religious leaders.
It's Sunday and the 'good folks' is off to church to seek redemption for their sins.
Meanwhile, us heathens are watching them parade by and laughing our asses off at their abject stupidity.
That's because you guys lack any knowledge about religion or about what motivates some people to seek it.It's Sunday and the 'good folks' is off to church to seek redemption for their sins.
Meanwhile, us heathens are watching them parade by and laughing our asses off at their abject stupidity.
My wife goes to church every Sunday. I never go as I have no use for churches or clergy. On the other hand I don't buy the idea that our universe and its order are happenstance. What we observe and experience isn't chaos.
My wife goes to church every Sunday. I never go as I have no use for churches or clergy. On the other hand I don't buy the idea that our universe and its order are happenstance. What we observe and experience isn't chaos.
wow… You managed to extract the essential and translate it in simple terms, as usual.
I don't believe in the "God or Allah or Budha" or the literal "Jesus took our sins" either, as described by some. But I'm also uncertain about this whole "random evolution out of chaos" atheist theory.
Because it doesn't explain so many things that are too organized. Moreover, animals and people are not just rats in a maze; there's that intrinsic desire for spirituality aka to immerse themselves in the world that surrounds them(be it nature, other beings or the world of ideas), in most of them.
It's the greatest mystery of all, and I believe that neither atheism nor religion have the full answers; but that they complement each other instead.
I'm bettin she looks forward to that hour of quiet all week.
Einstein and Richard Feynman were both atheists yet both said God doesn't play dice with the universe. Feynman said you cant escape the fact that the universe is fulla stuff rather then empty.
We like to think we're the pinnacle of evolution but I think we're much more primitive and not yet capable of knowing it all.
Instead of name-calling, why don't you try to dismantle his theory through counterarguments instead? Everything that he said here made sense to me.
I hate the homophobic and racist stuff that he puts out there too, but give him credit when credit's due: When it comes to non-race etc. related other matters, he's one of the more educated and intelligent Litsters.
Instead of name-calling, why don't you try to dismantle his theory through counterarguments instead? Everything that he said here made sense to me.
I hate the homophobic and racist stuff that he puts out there too, but give him credit when credit's due: When it comes to non-race etc. related other matters, he's one of the more educated and intelligent Litsters.
True, best argument espec. for the new atheists (the Sam Harris-type ones).Einstein and Richard Feynman were both atheists yet both said God doesn't play dice with the universe. Feynman said you cant escape the fact that the universe is fulla stuff rather then empty.
We like to think we're the pinnacle of evolution but I think we're much more primitive and not yet capable of knowing it all.
Umm, his thinking sounds like that of the "eugenics" fellas (aka clearly racist) to me, but it's the first time I heard about him.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_H._Calvin
My racist thinking comes from this guy. He has a theory about people. Societies located within the Tropics never produce advanced cultures. He says there are too few challenges for people with plenty of bananas and monkeys and snakes to eat. There's no competition for food. I'm a rational racist.
I contend the Sahara Desert created Egypt.
First of all, just clarifying that I'm trying to say that "people are different but just as valuable" as opposed to "which group of people is better". ((I'm Not a racist! This is only for any Sean-minded individuals who happen to read this post)).
1.My view is that even if some people are different, their different strengths and weaknesses balance things overall and bring them to the same level.
- For example: One could stretch it and generalize and say that overall, a lot of germans are more conscientious, organized and more "thinking (as opposed to feeling -nothing to do with IQ) oriented" than some Southern Europeans or South Americans. On the other hand, some of the latter tend to be a bit more creativ. than the first.
2.And even if some people "make it" compared to others:
Are those characteristics that ensure their success only due to biology or socialization?
- At the level of nations: one looks back in time and sees that historically or geographically, some nations had more advantages compared to others.
- At an individual level you see so many things that might make a difference, besides intellect and personal responsibility : opportunities available, emotional resilience and high self-esteem versus internalized oppression, societal expectations or pressures that get in their way etc.
My wife goes to church every Sunday. I never go as I have no use for churches or clergy. On the other hand I don't buy the idea that our universe and its order are happenstance. What we observe and experience isn't chaos.