NOIRTRASH
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2015
- Posts
- 10,580
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Either the Litlibs are too embarrassed to post this morning or they haven't awakened yet.
I'm guessing #2.
How many senators who were in the 86th are still in the senate today?Simple Resolution: Designated "S. Res.," simple resolutions are used to express nonbinding positions of the Senate or to deal with the Senate's internal affairs, such as the creation of a special committee. They do not require action by the House of Representatives.
No Throb has already apparently taken a shot at my daughter...
.
Yeah, a resolution from 56 years ago is certainly relevant today.![]()
Yeah, a resolution from 56 years ago is certainly relevant today.![]()
About recess appointments, no less.
It's amazing how much you love showing your ignorance.As predicted...
And the Schumer clip from 2007...
![]()
![]()
Too old to be relevant?
So he was in the minority then and he's in the minority now but the party of the President is the thing that has changed, just like his opinion.
Fucking idiot. All you can ever think of is how to defend the Democrats by yelling REPUBLICAN in a crowded PBS meeting...
No, you protest too much.
You summed it up with pretty much it when I described how your ilk view Republicans.
Bottom line: No SCOTUS confirmation this year unless its Biden.
You think they would confirm Uncle Joe?
Are we really bringing up 56 year old evidence of the shoe is on the other foot? The overwhelming majority of us weren't even ALIVE for that and those of us who were most likely were not voting. I mean how many 74+ year olds are on lit? Hell given the average age of death (despite people living longer) there are only so many people alive period who were in anyway relevant to that scenario.
This however is relevant. So the question here becomes what DID happen to the Bush appointees in his election year?
Now this would be legit shoe is on the other foot.
Possibly even 77-year-olds. 18-year-olds couldn't vote nationwide until 1971, and this is older than that. We're really going off a non-binding article from before 18-year-olds could vote?