Ok, so the wife was watching "that show" again. And I heard Whoopi bashing women depilating the pubic region. Naturally, my first thought was when in her autobiography she admitted in the first few pages to going down on herself. My second was of Ted doing blackface at her roast and her claiming to have put him up to it.
But, then I stood there and thought about what she (and the rest of the women) were saying, that removing the hair there is an effort to look young, as in "attract pedophiles" young, in the porn industry.
I've had a few days since to think about it and I'm scratching my head even harder.
Men depilate their faces and the backs of their necks and, apparently, now even pull out the hedge trimmers on their chests, armpits, legs. Even the eyebrows aren't safe as there is tweezing going on in some dark corners.
Women, on the other hand, have been going at any hair other than the crowns of their heads for decades. A bathroom with a female over the age of thirteen generally looks like a science experiment gone horribly wrong from my experience with lip hair removal creams, arm pit hair removal creams, leg hair removal creams, and of course the various creams to take care of the chemical burns from the removal creams. (Not to mention various make-ups and make-up removal paraphernalia.)
So, none of the rest of that has the same effect? How is writing a story where her fingers caressed his smooth cheek as they broke from a kiss any different than "his fingers caressed her smooth, hairless mound as he lifted his lips from her sweet pussy"?
Just what am I missing that a smooth shaved pussy, or a "landing strip" at the most, is somehow indicative of underage when all the rest isn't? Seriously, I just thought it was a "beauty regimen" thing. So, I guess I have to write my characters with a thick brush of curls now? And God help me if I write about the American Indian Princess (Choctaw) that I knew since it was my understanding that she was naturally smooth at forty.
But, then I stood there and thought about what she (and the rest of the women) were saying, that removing the hair there is an effort to look young, as in "attract pedophiles" young, in the porn industry.
I've had a few days since to think about it and I'm scratching my head even harder.
Men depilate their faces and the backs of their necks and, apparently, now even pull out the hedge trimmers on their chests, armpits, legs. Even the eyebrows aren't safe as there is tweezing going on in some dark corners.
Women, on the other hand, have been going at any hair other than the crowns of their heads for decades. A bathroom with a female over the age of thirteen generally looks like a science experiment gone horribly wrong from my experience with lip hair removal creams, arm pit hair removal creams, leg hair removal creams, and of course the various creams to take care of the chemical burns from the removal creams. (Not to mention various make-ups and make-up removal paraphernalia.)
So, none of the rest of that has the same effect? How is writing a story where her fingers caressed his smooth cheek as they broke from a kiss any different than "his fingers caressed her smooth, hairless mound as he lifted his lips from her sweet pussy"?
Just what am I missing that a smooth shaved pussy, or a "landing strip" at the most, is somehow indicative of underage when all the rest isn't? Seriously, I just thought it was a "beauty regimen" thing. So, I guess I have to write my characters with a thick brush of curls now? And God help me if I write about the American Indian Princess (Choctaw) that I knew since it was my understanding that she was naturally smooth at forty.