Confessions: What are yours? (part 3)

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's funny, because here pickled cucumbers are the most common form of pickled food. So much that when you ask for a pickle that's what you get.
 
ICT I just slept in for the first time in years, 4 hours longer than usual.

IACT after hearing a friend is having a me day today, I also wanted one, and am doing whatever the hell I want to today.

IFCT I'm not going to shave today. Hold be back....
 
ICT I just slept in for the first time in years, 4 hours longer than usual.

IACT after hearing a friend is having a me day today, I also wanted one, and am doing whatever the hell I want to today.

IFCT I'm not going to shave today. Hold be back....

Ict- maybe there is a benefit to a hijacked thread?

Iact- I am going out to dinner tonight and contemplating wearing a kegel trainer while I'm out. :D
 
Ict- maybe there is a benefit to a hijacked thread?

Iact- I am going out to dinner tonight and contemplating wearing a kegel trainer while I'm out. :D

ICT after Googling Kegal Trainers, I'm not sure how you could wear that while at dinner.
 
Mm, no. I don't owe secondary friends anything but kindness, and people know what I let them know. If someone thinks I don't like them, they done fucked something up really badly. But thanks for your advice.

ICT I think an aspect of the issue may be differential understanding of the meaning of the construction 'don't like'. Most people divide the world into people they like, people they dislike, and people they do not yet know. Some of us divide the world into people we like, people we dislike, and people about whom we are ambivalent (people we do not know as well as people we do know who do not fit into the other two categories). It seems to be a subtle distinction on the surface, but it often manifests in a very different manner of navigating social interactions. It also may lead to a different intended meaning of the declaration 'I do not like person X'.

For someone who categorizes known persons into the like/dislike dichotomy, stating that one does not like someone else equates to a declaration of dislike. For someone who categorizes known persons into the like/ambivalent /dislike continuum, stating that one does not like someone else, but not actively declaring dislike, is an indication of ambivalence. From your posts, I suspect that you operate in the like/ambivalent /dislike continuum rather than the like/dislike dichotomy, and so your comment that you do not like your SO's friends did not mean you actively dislike them as much as it meant that you are ambivalent about them.

Thus, the advice given about being 'real' likely seemed misplaced to you as treating nicely someone about whom you are ambivalent is as 'real' to you as telling someone you dislike that you dislike that person. Or I could be projecting my own understanding of and schema for interpersonal interaction on you, and if this is so, I apologize.
 
ICT the other day I made my husband cum just by talking to him, surprised us both!

Anyway the subject was some kind of orgy with lots of girls . I then moved it on to going to a swingers club but not touxhing others just letting others watch us. He was keen, so keen he came in his pants . Now to work on making this a reality
 
ICT I think an aspect of the issue may be differential understanding of the meaning of the construction 'don't like'. Most people divide the world into people they like, people they dislike, and people they do not yet know. Some of us divide the world into people we like, people we dislike, and people about whom we are ambivalent (people we do not know as well as people we do know who do not fit into the other two categories). It seems to be a subtle distinction on the surface, but it often manifests in a very different manner of navigating social interactions. It also may lead to a different intended meaning of the declaration 'I do not like person X'.

For someone who categorizes known persons into the like/dislike dichotomy, stating that one does not like someone else equates to a declaration of dislike. For someone who categorizes known persons into the like/ambivalent /dislike continuum, stating that one does not like someone else, but not actively declaring dislike, is an indication of ambivalence. From your posts, I suspect that you operate in the like/ambivalent /dislike continuum rather than the like/dislike dichotomy, and so your comment that you do not like your SO's friends did not mean you actively dislike them as much as it meant that you are ambivalent about them.

Thus, the advice given about being 'real' likely seemed misplaced to you as treating nicely someone about whom you are ambivalent is as 'real' to you as telling someone you dislike that you dislike that person. Or I could be projecting my own understanding of and schema for interpersonal interaction on you, and if this is so, I apologize.

Appreciated
 
ICT I received a PM expressing surprise that I wrote my earlier post.

IACT I bring some of it on myself for affecting a ditzy attitude and not always proofing or taking enough time to make sure my posts here are in a formal/academic style. However, I am much more than just a nymphomaniac reformed party girl.

IACT speaking of being a nympho, my husband's homecoming from his business trip (his first since our marriage) was fun but short. He was very tired. He had been on the East Coast, and flying to where we live from the East Coast is an ordeal involving one or more layovers.

IFCT that he wanted a shower as soon as we were home from the airport, so he received his welcome home BJ in the shower. After the shower, he was revived enough for sex, but it was far more gentle than what I had been thinking about all day. Still it was very, very nice. He is still sleeping now, which is good. He needs his rest for what I have planned for later. :devil:
 
ICT I received a PM expressing surprise that I wrote my earlier post.

IACT I bring some of it on myself for affecting a ditzy attitude and not always proofing or taking enough time to make sure my posts here are in a formal/academic style. However, I am much more than just a nymphomaniac reformed party girl.

IACT speaking of being a nympho, my husband's homecoming from his business trip (his first since our marriage) was fun but short. He was very tired. He had been on the East Coast, and flying to where we live from the East Coast is an ordeal involving one or more layovers.

IFCT that he wanted a shower as soon as we were home from the airport, so he received his welcome home BJ in the shower. After the shower, he was revived enough for sex, but it was far more gentle than what I had been thinking about all day. Still it was very, very nice. He is still sleeping now, which is good. He needs his rest for what I have planned for later. :devil:

ICT what the very naughty you have planned for later excites me no end
 
ICT I think an aspect of the issue may be differential understanding of the meaning of the construction 'don't like'. Most people divide the world into people they like, people they dislike, and people they do not yet know. Some of us divide the world into people we like, people we dislike, and people about whom we are ambivalent (people we do not know as well as people we do know who do not fit into the other two categories). It seems to be a subtle distinction on the surface, but it often manifests in a very different manner of navigating social interactions. It also may lead to a different intended meaning of the declaration 'I do not like person X'.

For someone who categorizes known persons into the like/dislike dichotomy, stating that one does not like someone else equates to a declaration of dislike. For someone who categorizes known persons into the like/ambivalent /dislike continuum, stating that one does not like someone else, but not actively declaring dislike, is an indication of ambivalence. From your posts, I suspect that you operate in the like/ambivalent /dislike continuum rather than the like/dislike dichotomy, and so your comment that you do not like your SO's friends did not mean you actively dislike them as much as it meant that you are ambivalent about them.

Thus, the advice given about being 'real' likely seemed misplaced to you as treating nicely someone about whom you are ambivalent is as 'real' to you as telling someone you dislike that you dislike that person. Or I could be projecting my own understanding of and schema for interpersonal interaction on you, and if this is so, I apologize.

Very nicely put. I agree.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top