Militia takes over Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters in Oregon

The GOP leadership are the ones who don't seem to care. They're silent about this.

Know why? Because these guys are whackjobs. :cool:

Ted Cruz, curiously, came out against them. Doing a complete one eighty on the second amendment dog whistle stuff he was punting last year.
 
Ted Cruz, curiously, came out against them. Doing a complete one eighty on the second amendment dog whistle stuff he was punting last year.

No worries - he'll be there, carrying a gun with them, by Wednesday.
 
Makes sense - he's still running, and no one's taken him seriously since he declared.

He needs press.

He had one person, the head of the local Republican Party, show up to one of his campaign stops in Iowa.
 
That's insane. How can anyone support them, they haven't said what they wanted yet.

Jesus fucking Christ man.

These guys are idiots.
(Even if they are idiots that are peacefully protesting a solid cause)

But you are just fucking dumb.

They want BLM land returned to the farmers they stole it from.
They want the courts to reverse the 5 year minimum terrorist law that put these ranchers in jail after they have already served their original sentence.


How can you honestly even comment in this thread with out knowing this?

And for any idiot that thinks the BLM is innocent here please do the research before shooting off your mouth. Or simply trust them. That worked out well for the Indians.....

Seriously. These yokels may be going about this all wrong. But most the people in this thread have shown an intelligence level well below theirs...
 
Jesus fucking Christ man.

These guys are idiots.
(Even if they are idiots that are peacefully protesting a solid cause)

But you are just fucking dumb.

They want BLM land returned to the farmers they stole it from.
They want the courts to reverse the 5 year minimum terrorist law that put these ranchers in jail after they have already served their original sentence.


How can you honestly even comment in this thread with out knowing this?

And for any idiot that thinks the BLM is innocent here please do the research before shooting off your mouth. Or simply trust them. That worked out well for the Indians.....

Seriously. These yokels may be going about this all wrong. But most the people in this thread have shown an intelligence level well below theirs...

We're reaching the point where I'm actually starting to pity you.

You've been arguing based on whatever emotions you happen to be feeling instead of facts.

The courts can't make up laws as they go along. The Hammonds were convicted of arson of federal lands, that carries a five year minimum. No court in the land can change that.

So the terrorists here want the land returned to the Native Americans who were the original owners the government stole the land from?
 
Jesus fucking Christ man.

These guys are idiots.
(Even if they are idiots that are peacefully protesting a solid cause)

But you are just fucking dumb.

They want BLM land returned to the farmers they stole it from.
They want the courts to reverse the 5 year minimum terrorist law that put these ranchers in jail after they have already served their original sentence.


How can you honestly even comment in this thread with out knowing this?

And for any idiot that thinks the BLM is innocent here please do the research before shooting off your mouth. Or simply trust them. That worked out well for the Indians.....

Seriously. These yokels may be going about this all wrong. But most the people in this thread have shown an intelligence level well below theirs...

You stp being peaceful the exact second you pick up a firearm.

The government ultimately has the right to steal your land. They try not to because it's impolite but they absolutely have that right. As do the people the right to bitch about it.

Worked out well for the Indians? Please citation is needed on the interactions of the BLM and the Native Americans cus that sounds straight made up. If you mean don't trust your government. . .we weren't their government for most of that time. As I recall it wasn't until post WW1 that it was universally settled that they were Americans and not some weird psuedo-independent nation(s). And they really didn't have much alternative.
 
We're reaching the point where I'm actually starting to pity you.

You've been arguing based on whatever emotions you happen to be feeling instead of facts.

The courts can't make up laws as they go along. The Hammonds were convicted of arson of federal lands, that carries a five year minimum. No court in the land can change that.

So the terrorists here want the land returned to the Native Americans who were the original owners the government stole the land from?

You mean like the fact that you didn't even know what their demands are?

Are the fact you are calling people holding a 100% peaceful protest terriosts?
 
90% of the depth of knowledge in this thread seems to becoming from Facebook meme's.

Wake me up if anyone intelligent comes in with actual knowledge or original thoughts.

Seriously. You people are fucking morons.
 
You mean like the fact that you didn't even know what their demands are?

Are the fact you are calling people holding a 100% peaceful protest terriosts?

You didn't respond to my post (because you can't). They want the land returned to the Native Americans who it was stolen from?

So if the Hammonds are released form jail they'll leave?

If it was a "peaceful" protest they wouldn't need guns.
 
They want BLM land returned to the farmers they stole it from.
They want the courts to reverse the 5 year minimum terrorist law that put these ranchers in jail after they have already served their original sentence.

The claim that the BLM "stole" land from farmers is a lie. So is the claim that the Hammonds (who don't want these fuckwits involved in their case) were sentenced under any form of "terrorist law."

Repeating these claims doesn't position you well for talking about who's a moron.
 
This is the post of someone trying to back track because he finally figured out they can legally carry :)

But, yes. I did enjoy pointing out you didn't even understand the bullshit you posted. :cool:

Perhaps you should stick to more lies about your fake degrees?

It seems to me the issue is not whether they can legally carry firearms. OK, they can do that in Oregon. Fine and dandy, BUT it is what they are doing or threatening to do with said guns they carry that would be illegal. Them being sentenced twice for the same crime is a bit iffy, but going through a legal appeals process seems to be a better choice than their present one.
 
The claim that the BLM "stole" land from farmers is a lie. So is the claim that the Hammonds (who don't want these fuckwits involved in their case) were sentenced under any form of "terrorist law."

Repeating these claims doesn't position you well for talking about who's a moron.

Anti terrisom act of 1996 dictated the 5 year minimum.
The federal government sued to have it applied years after the original judge said it shouldn't.

This is a simple fact. It is not debatable.

Now I could see how you could say the BLM didn't "steal" land from farmers in that area. But as I have seen no evidence you even know the facts yet I will not argue it with you.
 
It seems to me the issue is not whether they can legally carry firearms. OK, they can do that in Oregon. Fine and dandy, BUT it is what they are doing or threatening to do with said guns they carry that would be illegal. Them being sentenced twice for the same crime is a bit iffy, but going through a legal appeals process seems to be a better choice than their present one.

These guys are idiots.

That is clear.

As of yet, they have done nothing or threatened no one. So when you say what they are doing.... The fact is they are doing nothing but occupying a empty cabin while peacefully protesting.

Just because I walked in to the grocery store with a colt defender in my back today doesn't make me anything but a shopper.

People here are hypocrites. They will preach tolerance. But the fact is they are tolerant of protesters as long as they agree with what they are protesting.

If they don't they use words like terriosts while racially profiling. Basically making them intolerant, racist shit stains who get their "facts" from Facebook.
 
Last edited:
As of yet, they have done nothing or threatened no one. So when you say what they are doing.... The fact is they are doing nothing but occupying a empty cabin while peacefully protesting.

Peaceful protestors do not arm themselves.

People here are hypocrites. They will preach tolerance. But the fact is they are tolerant of protesters as long as they agree with what they are protesting.

You're the exact same way, and everyone knows it.
 
Anti terrisom act of 1996 dictated the 5 year minimum.

This does not mean they were sentenced as terrorists. It means that the minimum penalty of federal arson statutes was enhanced twenty years ago in part to deter terrorism. Those are not the same thing. Pretending they are the same thing doesn't put you in a good position to complain about who is a moron. Or for that matter about who does or doesn't know "the facts."

Aside from pointless and inept sniping you appear not to have anything very useful to say.
 
These guys are idiots.

That is clear.

As of yet, they have done nothing or threatened no one. So when you say what they are doing.... The fact is they are doing nothing but occupying a empty cabin while peacefully protesting.

Just because I walked in to the grocery store with a colt defender in my back today doesn't make me anything but a shopper.

So, you're calling yourself an idiot then too, frat boy?
 
Peaceful protestors do not arm themselves.



You're the exact same way, and everyone knows it.

Yes of course they don't.....

Not one Ferguson protestor had a gun....

And bullshit. I am fine with any idiot protesting anything. Even these idiots.

When shops gets burned down, looted, or innocent bystanders assaulted because of the color of their skin is when I have issues.

But I get it. Guns are scary....
 
Back
Top