It's war stupid!

Yes, and also something is rotten in Academia...


;) ;)


It seems that not only does Islam consider any examination of Islam blasphemy, but our more liberally orientated seem to consider it secular heresy to examine what drives Islamic violence in a world dominated by Peaceful Muslims...

They are quick to decry "Christian violence" which is current, ongoing, just an extension of the Crusades (which were only a big thing to the West, in the Arabic World, it was a minor skirmish on the periphery of their world, which was at peace, the peace of homogeny enforced by the sword and the new religion and language) and even quicker to defend and define Islam as purely peaceful and non-violent and any violence done in its name is not true Islam. Anyone who claims that history repeats itself for a reason, and then outline that reason is the real problem; their fear "recruits" violence.

It is a fertile as the imaginations of Joseph Heller.
 
Yes, and also something is rotten in Academia...


;) ;)


It seems that not only does Islam consider any examination of Islam blasphemy, but our more liberally orientated seem to consider it secular heresy to examine what drives Islamic violence in a world dominated by Peaceful Muslims...

They are quick to decry "Christian violence" which is current, ongoing, just an extension of the Crusades (which were only a big thing to the West, in the Arabic World, it was a minor skirmish on the periphery of their world, which was at peace, the peace of homogeny enforced by the sword and the new religion and language) and even quicker to defend and define Islam as purely peaceful and non-violent and any violence done in its name is not true Islam. Anyone who claims that history repeats itself for a reason, and then outline that reason is the real problem; their fear "recruits" violence.

It is a fertile as the imaginations of Joseph Heller.

There's a book out there on the subject, "The Ivory Tower of Babel."

Ishmael
 
Have you wikiwarriors and googlegeniuses decided yet how Moderate Muslims should interpret their holy book in order to convince Radical Jihadists that they aren't doing God's will?

Let me know when you've reached a consensus so we can go back to asking noobs for tits.

ty
 
*views post*

Define, moderate

Its ok, I'll wait:cool:

Lemme guess, they throw gaze off a 10 story bldg, not a 20 story

They use softer rocks?
 
*spews post*

Define, moderate

Its ok, I'll wait

Lemme guess, they throw gaze off a 10 story bldg, not a 20 story

They use softer rocks?

They're the ones who are sitting in their shoppes selling gold in Riyadh, selling clothing in Jeddah, in offices in Amman and cleaning gutters in Cairo.

You know, the ones like most of them who haven't got time in their lives for jihad because they're trying to eat and raise children - just like 99% of the rest of the world.

Islam lacks one thing that the other major religions have and the current schism (Islamic Jihadists) is the thing that is going to bring it about - all that remains is to see how many years, decades or centuries Islam resists it.
 
Have you wikiwarriors and googlegeniuses decided yet how Moderate Muslims should interpret their holy book in order to convince Radical Jihadists that they aren't doing God's will?

Let me know when you've reached a consensus so we can go back to asking noobs for tits.

ty

No. All I did was point out the reverse engineering that allows radicalism.

I have no answers; those answers are with the faithful who seem to acquiesce whenever presented with a choice between radicalism and peace, mainly because peace will not cut off their fawkin' heads...

:eek:

At least the Christian Church had a reformation beginning with Nicea, Luther and culminating in the rejection of Rev'rund Phelps; 100%.

Islam still defenestrates gays from the rooftops.
 
No. All I did was point out the reverse engineering that allows radicalism.

I have no answers; those answers are with the faithful who seem to acquiesce whenever presented with a choice between radicalism and peace, mainly because peace will not cut off their fawkin' heads...

:eek:

At least the Christian Church had a reformation beginning with Nicea, Luther and culminating in the rejection of Rev'rund Phelps; 100%.

Islam still defenestrates gays from the rooftops.



Ding. He gets the fuzzy doll. Islam is going to experience a reformation, a second prophet; something is going to come of millions of them dead by Jihad that leads the religion into the 21st century.

The question is when, how many million dead and how long will the last holdouts keep trying to recreate the year 600.
 
Ding. He gets the fuzzy doll. Islam is going to experience a reformation, a second prophet; something is going to come of millions of them dead by Jihad that leads the religion into the 21st century.

The question is when, how many million dead and how long will the last holdouts keep trying to recreate the year 600.

The problem is that in order to be the "last" prophet, Mohammed (or his revisionist chroniclers) actually took the only person named in the Koran, his adopted son, and declared him unadopted and adoption illegal in Islam. He was to be, in either his mind, or in the creators of the new religion and new language to be the last word in religion and that religion had a message: sword and submission.

Until the end of time or the total submission to Islam as I tried to explain to Colonel Hogan.
 
The problem is that in order to be the "last" prophet, Mohammed (or his revisionist chroniclers) actually took the only person named in the Koran, his adopted son, and declared him unadopted and adoption illegal in Islam. He was to be, in either his mind, or in the creators of the new religion and new language to be the last word in religion and that religion had a message: sword and submission.

Until the end of time or the total submission to Islam as I tried to explain to Colonel Hogan.

That was the Shi'a branch of the family that still believes in a hereditary lineage. (You can tell the hereditary pretenders by their black head dress.)

The more moderate Caliph's, along with the Mu'tazilites, hung in until the 11th century when the school of al Ashar'i took hold and began the Sunni sect.

Since then both schools murder infidels and barbarians and when they run out of those they murder each other. Quite a religion of peace they have.

Ishmael
 
Some Haddiths submit that it was just to marry his daughter-in-law...


;) ;)


But let us forgo history, scholarship and the current violence and reject all of that with comforting thought that almost all of Islam is peaceful especially in those places where it such a tiny minority as to be insignificant in local politics and such a majority as to be homogeneous to the individual nation.

Ignore that which happens when the former morphs into the latter; that is simple Islamophobia.

:nods:
 
They're the ones who are sitting in their shoppes selling gold in Riyadh, selling clothing in Jeddah, in offices in Amman and cleaning gutters in Cairo.

You know, the ones like most of them who haven't got time in their lives for jihad because they're trying to eat and raise children - just like 99% of the rest of the world.

Islam lacks one thing that the other major religions have and the current schism (Islamic Jihadists) is the thing that is going to bring it about - all that remains is to see how many years, decades or centuries Islam resists it.

you mean they LOOK and ACT exactly like the SB killers and teh TUBE bombers and the Glasgow bombers and Maj Hassan etc etc

you know....NORMAL:rolleyes:
 
Sharia Kbate wouldnt get this

They're the ones who are sitting in their shoppes selling gold in Riyadh, selling clothing in Jeddah, in offices in Amman and cleaning gutters in Cairo.

You know, the ones like most of them who haven't got time in their lives for jihad because they're trying to eat and raise children - just like 99% of the rest of the world.

Islam lacks one thing that the other major religions have and the current schism (Islamic Jihadists) is the thing that is going to bring it about - all that remains is to see how many years, decades or centuries Islam resists it.

WELL, EVIL GENERALLY LACKS SELF-AWARENESS: Ronald Kessler, “The FBI’s Problem with Muslim Leaders.”

As we all know, the vast majority of Muslims are peace-loving. We all have Muslim friends or co-workers who are admirable people. And a handful of terrorist plots have been rolled up by the FBI based on tips from Muslims.

But what the FBI finds disturbing is that Muslim leaders by and large are reluctant to cooperate with the FBI to let the bureau know of radicals within their midst. The FBI is not about to publicize this. But for my book “The Secrets of the FBI,” Arthur M. “Art” Cummings II, who was the FBI’s executive assistant director in charge of counterterrorism and national security investigations, opened up about the problem.

The FBI has outreach programs to try to develop sources in the Muslim community and solicit tips, but Mr. Cummings found little receptivity. He found that while Muslims have brought some cases to the FBI, Muslim leaders in particular are often in denial about the fact that the terrorists who threaten the United States are Muslims.

“I had this discussion with the director of a very prominent Muslim organization here in D.C.,” Mr. Cummings told me. “And he said, ‘Why are you guys always looking at the Muslim community?’ “

Mr. Cummings began laughing.

“OK, you know what I’ll do?” Mr. Cummings said. “I’ll start an Irish squad, or how about a Japanese squad? You want me to waste my time and your taxpayer’s dollars going to look at the Irish? They’re not killing Americans. Right now, I’m going to put my money and my people in a place where the threat is.” . . .

While Muslims will occasionally condemn al Qaeda, “rarely do we have them coming to us and saying, ‘There are three guys in the community that we’re very concerned about,’” Mr. Cummings said. “They want to fix it inside the community. They’re a closed group, a very, very closed group. It’s part of their culture that they want to settle the problem within their own communities. They’ve actually said that to us, which I then go crazy over.”. . .

“I talked to a very prominent imam in the U.S.,” Mr. Cummings said. “We would have our sweets and our sweet tea. We would talk a lot about Islam. I would say we understand Islam and where they’re coming from. We’d tell him what our mission is, trying to keep people from murdering Americans or anybody else, for that matter.”

Months later, the FBI found out that the man’s mosque had two extremists who were so radical that they kicked them out. Clearly, those two extremists would have been of interest to the FBI. If they only engaged in anti-American rhetoric, the FBI would have left them alone. More likely they were planning action to go with their rhetoric.

Mr. Cummings asked the imam, “What happened?”

“What do you mean?” the imam asked.

“Why didn’t you tell me about this?” the agent said.

“Why would I tell you about this?” the imam said. “They’re not terrorists,” he said of the radicals. “They just hate the U.S. government.”


This shouldn’t be surprising to anyone who understands Islam, which considers non-Muslims to be third class citizens (behind Muslim women) and does not recognize the legitimacy of authority exercised by non-Muslims.

Plus, you know, evil is rarely self-aware, incapable of introspection, excuses its own behavior, and always tries to exert control.
 
Ding. He gets the fuzzy doll. Islam is going to experience a reformation, a second prophet; something is going to come of millions of them dead by Jihad that leads the religion into the 21st century.

The question is when, how many million dead and how long will the last holdouts keep trying to recreate the year 600.


I can't and won't dispute this but I am interested in hearing on what you base this theory.
 
Only Muslims murder in the name of their faith.

The Catholics never did that. Ask anyone from Ireland.

Catholics have changed of course. Now they mostly rape little boys.
 
*inexplicably views fucking pos, again*:cool:



Your post was pure rubbish and said nothing.

pointing to people in Egypt etc that work in stores or man businesses etc

doesnt mean thet ARENT terrorists or portential terrorists

teh SB killers were perfectly normal, as were TUBE bombers etc

You cant tell the good from bad...

Its beyond your gaze to understand


Perfect: ‘You Ain’t No Muslim’ Guy Now Afraid Of Being Killed By Muslims

A British man shouted, “You ain’t no Muslim, bruv!” at a terrorist. What happened next won’t exactly blow your mind.

In my recent list of tropes for the political use and misuse of terrorism, I included a form of argument called No True Muslim. It’s a play on an old form of circular reasoning known as No True Scotsman and goes something like this.

No true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge.
But my Uncle Hamish puts sugar on his porridge.

Aye, then he must be no true Scotsman.

In the No True Muslim version, “the trope is used by a non-Muslim to disavow the association of Muslims with any negative qualities — particularly religiously motivated violence — by asserting that anyone who commits such violence must be No True Muslim.”


http://thefederalist.com/2015/12/16/...ed-by-muslims/
 
Back
Top