Fucking Robots?

[JackLuis]

Sex, love and robots — is this the end of intimacy?

There is a new scientific field opening up called Teledildonics!

Except Futurama’s 2001 episode “I Dated a Robot”, with its post-apocalyptic world of silvers and blues, wildly overestimated how long it would take before this fear became flesh. It’s November 2015, and in Malaysia, where humidity is at 89% and it is almost certainly still raining, David Levy, a founder of the second annual Congress on Love and Sex with Robots , is free to talk on the phone – he is less busy than planned. “I never expected to end up here,” he says. I hear a shrug.

They have seen the future of sex, they say, and it is teledildonic.

Hyped as the new wave in erotic tech, tele-dildonics are smart sex toys connected to the internet

Today the RealDoll team, infamous now for its lifelike sex dolls (of which they claim to have sold more than 5,000), is extending its range to develop an artificial intelligence system capable both of following commands and talking back to its user. A Realbotix head (reports the New York Times) which can be attached to the existing RealDoll body will cost around $10,000, and will be available in 2017. In a piece entitled “Is This the Dawn of the Sexbots?” , the company’s owner David Mills explained the appeal of these warm-to- the-touch dolls, telling Vanity Fair he loves women but “doesn’t really like to be around people”.

“Women have enjoyed sex toys for 50 years,” he said (after introducing his first model, which arrived at his home in what looks like a customised coffin, head not yet attached), “but men are still stigmatised. We have to correct that. I want to be the Rosa Parks of sex dolls. Men are not going to sit in the back of the bus any more.”

Finally something that will fuck Donald Trump!

 

[Hypoxia]

Any web-connected devices can be hacked. Teledildonics, supertoys, sexbots, all are susceptible. If any individual's toys can be ID'd, that person can be targeted. Set dildos to 'kill'. Just wait till Anonymous finds the URL of Tromp's fleshlight.

 

[GoldenCojones]

Sex, love and robots — is this the end of intimacy?

There is a new scientific field opening up called Teledildonics!


Finally something that will fuck Donald Trump!

We don't need something that will fuck Trump. We need him to go fuck himself.

 

[rjordan]

We don't need something that will fuck Trump. We need him to go fuck himself.

Either way, I bet Ivanka would be relieved to hear it after her own father said he would date her. That's one creepy guy on just about every front.

rj

 

[oggbashan]

As usual, Og beat reality to it.

2005

https://www.literotica.com/s/golem-1

And 2003

https://www.literotica.com/s/socks-for-christmas

 

[Bramblethorn]

Any web-connected devices can be hacked. Teledildonics, supertoys, sexbots, all are susceptible. If any individual's toys can be ID'd, that person can be targeted. Set dildos to 'kill'. Just wait till Anonymous finds the URL of Tromp's fleshlight.

This is pretty much the plot of "Rule 34": somebody starts killing spammers by hacking their web-connected devices. I can't remember if that bit includes sex toys, but there's certainly a dildo-related hack in there.

 

[Bramblethorn]

Meanwhile...

Love and Sex with Robots conference cancelled for fear people would have sex with robots or as one wit put it: "God created Adam and Eve, not Florence and the Machine".

 

[Five_Inch_Heels]

Nobody remembers 'Cherry 2000'?

 

[Handley_Page]

Sex, love and robots — is this the end of intimacy?

There is a new scientific field opening up called Teledildonics!

Finally something that will fuck Donald Trump!

Are these the firm ? See Here

 

[Hypoxia]

Nobody remembers 'Cherry 2000'?

Got her. I also have robo-sex in underground comix from an earlier era. One memorable piece (in SOFTCORE #1, Print Mint, 1974) featured a mad scientist's robo-clone fucking his voluptuous daughter. Of course the meme began with Fritz Lang's METROPOLIS, way back when. Or maybe before -- do golems count? And I wonder if any "Machine Man" pr0n-lit was written or drawn in the 1880s.

Hmmm, plot bunny. The first hackable networked sex-toy is a telegraph-driven solenoid dildo circa 1860. Unscrupulous wiretappers send bogus Morse codes making the device go wild, driving users (including poor Mary Todd Lincoln) to hysteria. The scheme is uncovered and broken by heroic young Tom Edison.

 

[Handley_Page]

As usual, Og beat reality to it.

2005

https://www.literotica.com/s/golem-1

And 2003

https://www.literotica.com/s/socks-for-christmas

And Damned good they are, too

 

[RejectReality]

There have been internet connected sex-toys available since the late 90s.

The reason they've never really made a splash is because of price, platform exclusivity, and short-lived runs due to patent negotiations on the components falling apart after a while.

 

[Hypoxia]

There have been internet connected sex-toys available since the late 90s.

The reason they've never really made a splash is because of price, platform exclusivity, and short-lived runs due to patent negotiations on the components falling apart after a while.

WiFi-enabled Magic Wands are coming. The end is near.

 

[TxRad]

WiFi-enabled Magic Wands are coming. The end is near.

Whose end and how near is it?

Remote controlled eggs and Ben Wa balls have been around for a while. Talk about your wireless installation.

 

[Hypoxia]

Whose end and how near is it?

I'll resist the temptation to say, "Bend over and smile."

Remote controlled eggs and Ben Wa balls have been around for a while. Talk about your wireless installation.

Are those hard to hack? Does anyone sell universal remotes to hijack those? Imagine the fun: Walk into a crowded club or supermarket or mall with your wide-spectrum control box. Push those buttons, maxed-out. Note how many in the crowd scream and spasm, how many puddles form on the floor. Grin evilly and move on.

Now think of someone running a sniffer app on their phone. Known addresses of teledildonic devices are found; great! Run the control app. Punch all those devices into hyper-mode. Chaos! Entire commercial sectors could fall. Entire suburbs could be wiped out. Oh, the humanity!

 

[PervOtaku]

I remember when teledildonics was just a punchline, mostly related this this image:

http://www.datadreamer.com/_images/teledildonics_2_900.jpg

And then this season's CSI Cyber (which is half ridiculous bullshit) involved a teledildonics toy with malware that allowed the hacker to spy on the people using them.

 

[HandsInTheDark]

A few notes on teledildonics:

1) I've experimented. Spotty wifi and cell service mean you can't do what everyone really wants to do, surprise your girl with good vibrations at unexpected times in public. (It's kind of a dumb idea anyway; vibrating someone when you don't know their exact circumstances is unwise. No one needs a vibrator doing off as you're merging into traffic on a freeway.)

2) Risk of hackery is hardly non existent given the *very* crappy programming that goes into these things. But that just means someone can turn your vibrator on, and so what. There aren't going to be any hacks where a toy like this is going to shock someone or hurt them in any way, let alone kill them, simply because no amount of reprogramming is going to make any hardware do what it's not capable of doing. It's not like they are built with chainsaw motors. Nor are they difficult to remove if they do anything weird.

3) The first internet sex with a robot happened years ago. Someone wired up a text based IRC bot with a very limited ability to reply to statements; some of the canned replies had smiley and winky faces. I saw a transcript of some guy who started "flirting" with the textbot, and the generated responses, while not intelligent or even consistent, managed to convince him he was talking to a girl who was encouraging him. In a very few sentences he was describing how he was jerking off. His orgasm would then count as the first "actual sex" with a machine. Reading the transcript will instantly make you embarrassed for the male, it's a fine example of given no real encouragement, a desperately horny male will interpret nearly random replies as incentive to keep going.

 

[Hypoxia]

The problem is not: how to build feel-good sexbots and AI toys.

The problem is: control. And consciousness.

People want sexbots so 1) they can do anything sexual they wish and 2) they needn't be persuasive. No begging for weird positions and role-playing. No bribery. Give an order and it is obeyed -- until the batteries run down. And you won't be ridiculed or pitied.

Lobotomies would be more cost-effective. And there's so much raw material...