says the "person" who doesnt judge
says the "person" who sees evil and says, MEH......Timmy McVeigh
San Bernadino
- Thread starter thør
- Start date
says the "person" who doesnt judge
says the "person" who sees evil and says, MEH......Timmy McVeigh
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Posts
- 19,245
As usual The Team is up early stroking their, um, gun barrels over another tragedy. Look how excited they get when innocents are mowed down. Hey, even Ted Cruz knows we have no dog in this fight.
http://www.chud.com/community/content/type/61/id/158868/width/500/height/1000/flags/LL
Ishmael
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2001
- Posts
- 84,005
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Posts
- 19,245
Says every news outlet. Do you think it was someone other than an employee and his wife?
Eyereadtoo
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2014
- Posts
- 1,488
He certainly did that yesterday. Those bodies weren't cold yesterday and he ran off at his mouth re: gun control. Absolutely no mention about pipe bomb control, or how IED's are illegal, or how California is one of the most strictest states in the U.S. when it comes to gun laws.
Nope, its was all about (ready for this?) gun control.
And don't get me started on CNN and their announcement that those deaths yesterday were as a result of white supremacists. Seriously, you SJW's do this country, and the world as a whole, a HUGE favor and lock yourselves in a garage with a car engine running and just fall the fuck to sleep. The rest of us would be so much safer if you all did just that.
M
miles
Guest
Every time they attack us in one of these threads it's a reminder of how truly pathetic they are. It's like they're compelled to prove to everyone what fools they are.
M
miles
Guest
He wants more GUN SAFETY!!!!
yeah
no
motive
Our National Rorschach Test of Violence
From the Thursday edition of the Morning Jolt:
So How Much of this ‘Hybrid’ Attack Was Jihadism? Yesterday the country got the perfect Rorschach test of violence. People who want to downplay violent Islamist jihadism and self-radicalization among American-born Muslims will see “workplace violence” or an excuse for another gun control push. Others will contend is an Islamist sleeper cell, even if it isn’t formally set up by ISIS or al-Qaeda. CNN summarizes what is known about Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik: Police say Farook, 28, and Malik, 27, are either married or in a relationship. The Council on American Islamic Relations, a Muslim advocacy group, said Farook has been married for two years — but wouldn’t confirm whether Malik was the wife’s name. Farook and his wife left their 6-month-old girl with Farook’s grandmother Wednesday and said they had a doctor’s appointment.
They abandoned their child? Okay, stop.
This was not driven by a workplace dispute. To leave your infant child and then commit horrific violence that is likely to lead to your death from police action requires an almost otherworldly devotion to… some other cause, something you consider more important than life, death, and the inherent biological urge to protect your offspring. “Larry from accounting keeps taking the last doughnut at staff meetings” or “they took my red Swingline stapler” isn’t the sort of motive at work here. What motivation have we seen that would make seemingly ordinary people go on mass-murdering attacks? What ideology or twisted religious fervor have we seen people willing to sacrifice their children for, willing to die for?
How religious was he?
Farook, an American citizen, worked for the San Bernardino County Department of Health for the past few years and had a young daughter, his shocked father told the Daily News. “I haven’t heard anything,” the elder Syed Farook told The News before his son’s name became public. “He was very religious. He would go to work, come back, go to pray, come back. He’s Muslim.” Brad Thor notices the Council on American Islamic Relations sure got in front of the cameras fast. Oh, hm. A family member identified Malik as Farook’s wife, according to the Los Angeles Times. Farook’s coworkers told reporters from the same outlet that he had recently traveled to Saudi Arabia and came back to the United States with a wife whom he had met on the Internet.
Someone will insist, “oh, they were just crazy.” But there was nothing impulsive about this, as we see from leaving their child with the grandmother. These two put a lot of preparation into this: Soon, however, he stormed out in anger. The nature of the dispute was not clear, but when he returned with his wife, 27, both of them were dressed in tactical gear and carrying assault rifles, officials said. That level of preparation is among the factors investigators are weighing as they examine a motive for the attack. Chief Jarrod Burguan of the San Bernardino Police Department said at a news conference that the attack did not seem to be “a spur-of-the-moment thing.” Plus… small, portable GoPro cameras: A law enforcement source told Fox News that the couple were each carrying an AR-15 rifle and a pistol when they were shot and killed by police after a brief chase in their black SUV about 2 miles from the initial shooting site. The source said the vehicle also contained so-called “rollout bags” with multiple pipe bombs, as well as additional ammunition.
The couple also had GoPro cameras strapped to their body armor and wore tactical clothing, including vests stuffed with ammunition magazines. “That’s a military tactic for a sustained fight,” the source told Fox News of the rollout bags. That’s the sort of thing you bring if you want to make videos to terrorize other people, and rally others to their cause or ideology… it also would explain why they left the scene instead of staying to shoot it out with police at the social services facility. They intended to live to tell the tale, at least for a while. Each detail of this story adds one more layer of “what the hell?” The couple didn’t leave behind a note at Inland Regional. But they did stash three explosive devices — rigged to a remote-controlled toy car — that didn’t go off. See, when your perpetrators are using explosive devices, it’s stupid to argue that gun control laws are the right solution here. Inevitably, someone will call for “better background checks!” Except all of their guns were purchased legally – no criminal record, no record of mental issues – or taken from someone else who also passed a background check: Two .223 caliber rifles were in the car with them, along with two pistols.
They were legally purchased, police said. Two handguns traced back to Farook, an official said. He bought them three to four years ago. Someone else bought the two rifles, possibly a former roommate — also legally three or four years ago. Once again, short of nationwide mandatory confiscation of all firearms from civilians, no gun law would have prevented this. Not a seven-day waiting period. No “gun show loophole” applied. Limits on how much ammunition a gun can carry at one time might have had a marginal impact; there’s little sign the shooters encountered much resistance at the social services facility. Initial reports indicated they had as much time to reload as they needed and brought multiple weapons. President Obama, yesterday: And for those who are concerned about terrorism, some may be aware of the fact that we have a no-fly list where people can’t get on planes, but those same people who we don’t allow to fly could go into a store right now in the United States and buy a firearm and there’s nothing that we can do to stop them. That’s a law that needs to be changed. No, it doesn’t. For starters, unless you consider Ted Kennedy and the Weekly Standard’s Stephen Hayes to be dangerous terrorists –skip the Chappaquiddick jokes, please — the no-fly list unjustly includes a lot of Americans with no connection to terrorism or threat to fellow passengers. And once you’re on the watch list, there is no judicial review or other clear way to get off of the watch list.
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner
no
motive
Our National Rorschach Test of Violence
From the Thursday edition of the Morning Jolt:
So How Much of this ‘Hybrid’ Attack Was Jihadism? Yesterday the country got the perfect Rorschach test of violence. People who want to downplay violent Islamist jihadism and self-radicalization among American-born Muslims will see “workplace violence” or an excuse for another gun control push. Others will contend is an Islamist sleeper cell, even if it isn’t formally set up by ISIS or al-Qaeda. CNN summarizes what is known about Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik: Police say Farook, 28, and Malik, 27, are either married or in a relationship. The Council on American Islamic Relations, a Muslim advocacy group, said Farook has been married for two years — but wouldn’t confirm whether Malik was the wife’s name. Farook and his wife left their 6-month-old girl with Farook’s grandmother Wednesday and said they had a doctor’s appointment.
They abandoned their child? Okay, stop.
This was not driven by a workplace dispute. To leave your infant child and then commit horrific violence that is likely to lead to your death from police action requires an almost otherworldly devotion to… some other cause, something you consider more important than life, death, and the inherent biological urge to protect your offspring. “Larry from accounting keeps taking the last doughnut at staff meetings” or “they took my red Swingline stapler” isn’t the sort of motive at work here. What motivation have we seen that would make seemingly ordinary people go on mass-murdering attacks? What ideology or twisted religious fervor have we seen people willing to sacrifice their children for, willing to die for?
How religious was he?
Farook, an American citizen, worked for the San Bernardino County Department of Health for the past few years and had a young daughter, his shocked father told the Daily News. “I haven’t heard anything,” the elder Syed Farook told The News before his son’s name became public. “He was very religious. He would go to work, come back, go to pray, come back. He’s Muslim.” Brad Thor notices the Council on American Islamic Relations sure got in front of the cameras fast. Oh, hm. A family member identified Malik as Farook’s wife, according to the Los Angeles Times. Farook’s coworkers told reporters from the same outlet that he had recently traveled to Saudi Arabia and came back to the United States with a wife whom he had met on the Internet.
Someone will insist, “oh, they were just crazy.” But there was nothing impulsive about this, as we see from leaving their child with the grandmother. These two put a lot of preparation into this: Soon, however, he stormed out in anger. The nature of the dispute was not clear, but when he returned with his wife, 27, both of them were dressed in tactical gear and carrying assault rifles, officials said. That level of preparation is among the factors investigators are weighing as they examine a motive for the attack. Chief Jarrod Burguan of the San Bernardino Police Department said at a news conference that the attack did not seem to be “a spur-of-the-moment thing.” Plus… small, portable GoPro cameras: A law enforcement source told Fox News that the couple were each carrying an AR-15 rifle and a pistol when they were shot and killed by police after a brief chase in their black SUV about 2 miles from the initial shooting site. The source said the vehicle also contained so-called “rollout bags” with multiple pipe bombs, as well as additional ammunition.
The couple also had GoPro cameras strapped to their body armor and wore tactical clothing, including vests stuffed with ammunition magazines. “That’s a military tactic for a sustained fight,” the source told Fox News of the rollout bags. That’s the sort of thing you bring if you want to make videos to terrorize other people, and rally others to their cause or ideology… it also would explain why they left the scene instead of staying to shoot it out with police at the social services facility. They intended to live to tell the tale, at least for a while. Each detail of this story adds one more layer of “what the hell?” The couple didn’t leave behind a note at Inland Regional. But they did stash three explosive devices — rigged to a remote-controlled toy car — that didn’t go off. See, when your perpetrators are using explosive devices, it’s stupid to argue that gun control laws are the right solution here. Inevitably, someone will call for “better background checks!” Except all of their guns were purchased legally – no criminal record, no record of mental issues – or taken from someone else who also passed a background check: Two .223 caliber rifles were in the car with them, along with two pistols.
They were legally purchased, police said. Two handguns traced back to Farook, an official said. He bought them three to four years ago. Someone else bought the two rifles, possibly a former roommate — also legally three or four years ago. Once again, short of nationwide mandatory confiscation of all firearms from civilians, no gun law would have prevented this. Not a seven-day waiting period. No “gun show loophole” applied. Limits on how much ammunition a gun can carry at one time might have had a marginal impact; there’s little sign the shooters encountered much resistance at the social services facility. Initial reports indicated they had as much time to reload as they needed and brought multiple weapons. President Obama, yesterday: And for those who are concerned about terrorism, some may be aware of the fact that we have a no-fly list where people can’t get on planes, but those same people who we don’t allow to fly could go into a store right now in the United States and buy a firearm and there’s nothing that we can do to stop them. That’s a law that needs to be changed. No, it doesn’t. For starters, unless you consider Ted Kennedy and the Weekly Standard’s Stephen Hayes to be dangerous terrorists –skip the Chappaquiddick jokes, please — the no-fly list unjustly includes a lot of Americans with no connection to terrorism or threat to fellow passengers. And once you’re on the watch list, there is no judicial review or other clear way to get off of the watch list.
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner
Adre
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2012
- Posts
- 23,913
The Team mascot, Nipper, thinks he is under attack. You're scared most of the time aren't you.
Disgustipated
LAWLZ
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2011
- Posts
- 25,596
To be fair, we attack you in every thread. Because idiots.
the same "news" outlets taht WOULDNT say the names nor ascribe a motive
THOSE NEWS OUTLETS?
Eyereadtoo
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2014
- Posts
- 1,488
HA! Yes he does, doesn't he? He wants those who don't vote leftist/progressive to disarm but leave the poor Muslims, Hispanics, Chicago gangs, etc to the arms. Seriously, I've seen castrated bulls that had more balls than this POTUS.
Disgustipated
LAWLZ
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2011
- Posts
- 25,596
Fuckin' Oblamer! He should show the world how big his sac is by ranting like a ignorant lunatic on an erotic message board!
4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
Eyereadtoo
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2014
- Posts
- 1,488
I'm glad you agree.
phrodeau
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2002
- Posts
- 78,588
California may have strict gun laws, but the guns the attackers carried were still legal.
Adre
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2012
- Posts
- 23,913
Adre believes that he is on the cutting edge.
Fucking one-note moronic Nellie...
Again, this is AJ discussing the issues. Nice job, sparky, stay classy.
Adre believes that he is on the cutting edge.
Fucking one-note moronic Nellie...
the 1 note got old
after his 1st post
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Posts
- 19,245
the same "news" outlets taht WOULDNT say the names nor ascribe a motive
THOSE NEWS OUTLETS?
Their names were all over the place. His name was released probably within an hour. Actually, even less time than that. I heard it before I left my house which was maybe a half hour after the news hit. As to the motive, I'll wait for the FBI. Yes he was an employee and yes he was a Muslim.
teh Boston attack WASNT CLASSIFIED as a TERROR attack
teh attack and murders of teh Army recruiters STILL isnt given a motive
Colorado was,
pattern?
yes,
for you?
NO
VOTE CUNTCLINTONit is a BARBARIC CRIME to look like you and be so INSANE
for those of you that are metally ill and have the SIG LINES off
Im gonna do youse a favor
One time, DONT EXPECT MULTIPLE FAVORS
BAS~https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CVQdpysWUAERYvq.jpg
Im gonna do youse a favor
One time, DONT EXPECT MULTIPLE FAVORS
BAS~https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CVQdpysWUAERYvq.jpg
yeah, teh FBI
they couldnt even find YOUR DICK
how they gonna find a MOTIVE?
San Bernardino Shooter Syed Farook’s Accomplice Was His New Wife From Saudi Arabia, Had 6-Month-Old Baby – UPDATE: Couple Had “IED Factory” In Their Home…
By sheer coincidence, he recently grew out his beard.
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Posts
- 19,245
teh Boston attack WASNT CLASSIFIED as a TERROR attack
teh attack and murders of teh Army recruiters STILL isnt given a motive
Colorado was,
pattern?
yes,
for you?
NO
it is a BARBARIC CRIME to look like you and be so INSANE
http://38.media.tumblr.com/c968314fc6f2df52496e931276e6ce4d/tumblr_mqhwvm0oHt1s2wio8o2_400.gif
how many times are thouse of us that say
MUSLIMS ARE EVIL AND ARE KILLERS AND NEED TO BE DEALT WITH
axed, DO YOU KNOW ANY MUSLIMS???????????
well,
California #Jihad Muslim newlyweds slaughter co-workers who threw them a baby shower http://nyp.st/1Tz8oRH via @nypost
teh DEAD knew these MUSLIMS....right?
lets AXE them
what? they are dead? killed by MUSLIMS they knew?
WHO KNEW!
MUSLIMS ARE EVIL AND ARE KILLERS AND NEED TO BE DEALT WITH
axed, DO YOU KNOW ANY MUSLIMS???????????
well,
California #Jihad Muslim newlyweds slaughter co-workers who threw them a baby shower http://nyp.st/1Tz8oRH via @nypost
teh DEAD knew these MUSLIMS....right?
lets AXE them
what? they are dead? killed by MUSLIMS they knew?
WHO KNEW!
