Is Hssh345 right?

Oh here he is, Shorn-the-stalker, you just can't resist creeping in even if the thread has zilch to do with you, can you, Humper?

And yet you couldn't resist bringing my name up before I even posted in the thread, Humpty.
 
Oh here he is, Shorn-the-stalker, you just can't resist creeping in even if the thread has zilch to do with you, can you, Humper?

The question posed in your opening post is not open for answers and responses from those who read the thread? Are you only asking hash?
 
I think there are a lot of assholes on here being assholes to other assholes and only get bent when it is the assholes they like and join in when it's assholes they don't like. They justify their assholeness by the assholeness of the other. But miss the point, they're all assholes.

As far as the rest of the verbose post quoted, never had a problem with Laurel. I think she's far more patient than I'd be in her place.
 
And yet you couldn't resist bringing my name up before I even posted in the thread, Humpty.

Vanity is not your friend, a bit like eves dropping, you often get the shitty bits. Never mind, it is attention and that's what you crave.
 
Vanity is not your friend, a bit like eves dropping, you often get the shitty bits. Never mind, it is attention and that's what you crave.

You make every thread about me, Humpty. It's hilarious. Creepy and sad, but hilarious.
 
A little off topic but my understanding of even the second post in this thread shows why hashtag keeps failing. Given what the thread was about and the fact that the very first post said go to hell I just assume that it was tongue in cheek, good natured.

I had no way of knowing that there's some kind of history here. Technically I still don't necessarily know for sure they could both be pulling my leg.

That's the signature odd thing about hashtag. She wades in like she knows all the players and what's being discussed and what the history is. Some of this stuff goes back more than a decade.


I think there are a lot of assholes on here being assholes to other assholes and only get bent when it is the assholes they like and join in when it's assholes they don't like. They justify their assholeness by the assholeness of the other. But miss the point, they're all assholes.

As far as the rest of the verbose post quoted, never had a problem with Laurel. I think she's far more patient than I'd be in her place.

Well said.
 
Last edited:
No, I just wanted a discussion. Too bad "certain posters" diverted it.

Ah, I see.

To answer your opening post, I agree that attacking people who are down is in bad form. Yet, unlike a general internet comment section, this forum is filled with people who've known each other for years. The comments aren't random, they are filled with history. Hssh's problem is taking offense, constantly, with no knowledge of backstory.

He/she/it posted strangely at first, too. This is why I cannot take him/her/it seriously ever.
 
people here don't go out of their way to victimise the sick & sad, but there's a lot of schadenfreude if someone they despise falls ill or fucks up. especially if that someone has a reputation for stretching the truth, and their woes may be entirely invented for attention... boy who cried wolf scenarios.
 
I am totally confused here, I am going back to peeing in my refrigerated container ;)
 
Ah, I see.

To answer your opening post, I agree that attacking people who are down is in bad form. Yet, unlike a general internet comment section, this forum is filled with people who've known each other for years. The comments aren't random, they are filled with history. Hssh's problem is taking offense, constantly, with no knowledge of backstory.

He/she/it posted strangely at first, too. This is why I cannot take him/her/it seriously ever.

there's always a bit of that with new posters. a situation can seem quite unjust when you see ten people attacking one. but that one might have a long history of abusing others *cough*betty*cough* which explains why ten people are not ganging up, but rather have each chosen that stance as individuals.
 
Ok, this is making more sense now, I put the container back in the frig ;)
 
That's the signature odd thing about hashtag. She wades in like she knows all the players and what's being discussed and what the history is. Some of this stuff goes back more than a decade.

Thats why one cannot take him seriously. If you are gonna play here with another name and pretend you are new, you cannot slip up and join in on things you know nothing about.
 
Thats why one cannot take him seriously. If you are gonna play here with another name and pretend you are new, you cannot slip up and join in on things you know nothing about.

Fucking idiot was name dropping Cade the other day.
 
Thats why one cannot take him seriously. If you are gonna play here with another name and pretend you are new, you cannot slip up and join in on things you know nothing about.

bestest pm buddies with someone who knows 1/4 of the story is a common cause for that one.
 
there's always a bit of that with new posters. a situation can seem quite unjust when you see ten people attacking one. but that one might have a long history of abusing others *cough*betty*cough* which explains why ten people are not ganging up, but rather have each chosen that stance as individuals.

Then theres posters who just do what theyre told.
 
I used to like you, Tristesse,
but now, I am very angry with you.

I didn't ask for this Stooooopid celebrity status, I expressed my opinion there because a vanity thread was started on me. Until then, I used to be just a bully no one knew about. I want to be a faceless bully not a celebrity bully.


Please, Tristesse, could you please take my name off the thread title?
Many thanks

If you refuse, despite this:
FUCK YOU ALL AND STOP STARTING THREADS ABOUT ME!

She couldn't even if she wanted to, you can't change thread titles.
The only person who can is Laurel and in this case I doubt she would.
 
Back
Top