One woman speaks out on "toxic masculinity"

LJ_Reloaded

バクスター の
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
21,217
http://thatprivilegedlittlegirl.tum...iendly-reminder-that-masculinity-is-not-toxic
A friendly reminder that masculinity is not toxic

There is no shame in being male. You are not a bad person and you do not have to feel guilty or apologize for the actions of other men.

It’s also not wrong to be a masculine woman. You are not some kind of traitor, and preferring male company or having “masculine interests” does not make you any less valid as a woman.

Despite what some people may say you are a good person and there are people out there who care about you, even if it may not always seem like it. You matter.
 
"Toxic masculinity" is like "poisoned lemonade". It doesn't mean all lemonade is poisoned. But when it is, learn to smell the contaminant so you don't fucking drink it.

It's a dumb choice of term, since it apparently confuses morons. I prefer "machismo".
 
"Toxic masculinity" is like "poisoned lemonade". It doesn't mean all lemonade is poisoned. But when it is, learn to smell the contaminant so you don't fucking drink it.

It's a dumb choice of term, since it apparently confuses morons. I prefer "machismo".
Feminists think ALL masculinity is toxic.

They also say there is no such thing as toxic femininity.

You know, because female=sugar and spice and boys=snakes and snails
 
Feminists think ALL masculinity is toxic.

They also say there is no such thing as toxic femininity.

You know, because female=sugar and spice and boys=snakes and snails

Women are nothing without men and cant even be buried in a grave unless the man who owns them speaks up an says so. Otherwise the body is thrown for wild animals to eat.
A woman was made to"service men" and attend to every little wish of the man who owns her. Furthermore she may not use lubes while fukkin .

heh heh hee hee hyuk hyuk no lube and have to fuck a fat smelly arab dude what has been ridin and humpin his camel in the desert for the last three months;)


Fata would like that.

:H:D:D:D:D:D
 
Women are nothing without men and cant even be buried in a grave unless the man who owns them speaks up an says so. Otherwise the body is thrown for wild animals to eat.
A woman was made to"service men" and attend to every little wish of the man who owns her. Furthermore she may not use lubes while fukkin .

heh heh hee hee hyuk hyuk no lube and have to fuck a fat smelly arab dude what has been ridin and humpin his camel in the desert for the last three months;)


Fata would like that.

:H:D:D:D:D:D
^^^^^What the fuck...?
 
^^^^^What the fuck...?
What happens to a mad civilian dude that goes nutters outside on the streets and kills this other dude? The US army ate this point of time is a 100% professional volunteer army so every serviceman has joined up knowing what they have signed up for. So at best if they do weird things and claim "ptsd" they sould be treated as you would the civilian dude. There cant be two sets of Law books. As it is US servicemen are mollycoddled quite a lot as compared to let's say its' NATO allies. These be tough brave dudes wtf happens after they be tough and Brave how come they start shitting their pants? when they are safely home. Something stinks about this whole thing and it is not the shit
^^^^^^^ previous post a joke certainly not my views if you will look carefully, Troll stuff pretty cleverly done eh? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

^,I^
}____} (nah!)

:D:D:D:D:D
cheers and good luck dude,
Boom
 
^^^^^What the fuck...?

I did not know Fata likes humping fat Arab dudes who have been riding and humping their camel and not taking a shower for three monthsthat too without lubes. Duse !his thingy must smell of stale ejaculate and camel pussy !!
 
Feminists think ALL masculinity is toxic.

They also say there is no such thing as toxic femininity.

You know, because female=sugar and spice and boys=snakes and snails

I was once bullied by a radical femminist. She used to go on endlessly about how terrible men are and how they oppress women, but 90% of her -mostly unfounded- complaints were against women. And she was known for picking on newbees. Oh, and she hated the locals. So bizarre…

So my personal view is: Sometimes you come across a person who appears to hold extreme views on only One issue. But on a closer look, you can see that their extremism cuts across multiple domains.

But you are talking about Radical femminists. Don't know about the US, but I read some of the stuff written by more moderate femminists, and they seemed… moderate.
 
Last edited:
so those feminists say it... where does Hillary Clinton say it?

where does Gloria Steinham say it?


where does Malala Yousafzai say it?

where does Beyonce say it?

this is the problem with claiming an entire group says something..if even one person says something different your entire argument is bunk

sort of like the gamergate thing... gamergate can never be considered about ethics in journalism as long as there are gamergate proponents that are not unethical

so you're faced with having to own up to making inflammatory rhetoric about feminists... or go on record denouncing everything about gamergate

or do your own standards not apply to you?




or is this another example of you " winning" a debate



(also you never showed people mentioning female toxicity

or the origin of the puppy dog tails thing you seemed to blame on feminists too)
 
I think that too, badbabysitter, that in this thread, LJ is overdoing it with the generalizations. Of course there are 'radical' femminists who might think like that,
but what movement doesn't have them? - the extremists
 
I think that too, badbabysitter, that in this thread, LJ is overdoing it with the generalizations. Of course there are 'radical' femminists who might think like that,
but what movement doesn't have them? - the extremists

completely agree

but please note that the only radicals he talks about are feminists.. with occasional lip service to conservatives he doesnt agree with
 
so those feminists say it... where does Hillary Clinton say it?

where does Gloria Steinham say it?


where does Malala Yousafzai say it?

where does Beyonce say it?

this is the problem with claiming an entire group says something..if even one person says something different your entire argument is bunk

sort of like the gamergate thing... gamergate can never be considered about ethics in journalism as long as there are gamergate proponents that are not unethical

so you're faced with having to own up to making inflammatory rhetoric about feminists... or go on record denouncing everything about gamergate

or do your own standards not apply to you?




or is this another example of you " winning" a debate



(also you never showed people mentioning female toxicity

or the origin of the puppy dog tails thing you seemed to blame on feminists too)
You fuckers are known for characterizing all MRAs as misogynist pigs.

Call this payback.

How does your own medicine taste?
 
completely agree

but please note that the only radicals he talks about are feminists.. with occasional lip service to conservatives he doesnt agree with
Occasional? I bash them more often than you do. I sure as hell bash them more often than you call out radical feminists.

I bash MRAs like Paul Elam more often than you bash radical feminists.

Oh wait, you never call out and almost never bash radical feminists.

Take note of that, hssh. Ever see Badbabysitter post a thread calling out radical feminist behavior, EVER?

I post threads about good feminists. Has Badbabysitter ever praised a MRA? Nope, because all MRAs are evil to her, and not all feminists are evil in my book.

Badbabysitter is the extremist here. She NEVER condemns bad feminist behavior - she always defends them and deflects with "but teh menz do it, too!"
 
You fuckers are known for characterizing all MRAs as misogynist pigs.

Call this payback.

How does your own medicine taste?

and here comes the derp

he can't counter what I said....so it comes down to name calling and acting like a 12 year old

another " victory" for LT
 
Occasional? I bash them more often than you do.

No, you really don't....I can do that thread comparison thing again... you didnt do so well last time... doubt things have changed much



I sure as hell bash them more often than you call out radical feminists.


Dude, you bash anyone that doesnt agree with you completely

I bash MRAs like Paul Elam more often than you bash radical feminists.

No, you don't... I can count on one hand the number of times you've bashed him in 10 years

Oh wait, you never call out and almost never bash radical feminists.

Take note of that, hssh. Ever see Badbabysitter post a thread calling out radical feminist behavior, EVER?

yup.. read the threads

I post threads about good feminists.

You post threads praising anti-feminists too


Has Badbabysitter ever praised a MRA?
Nope, because all MRAs are evil to her, and not all feminists are evil in my book.


I have yet to find one praise worthy.. who exactly am I supposed to praise? name one

the MRA leadership is almost exclusively douchebags and right wing reactionaries

Badbabysitter is the extremist here. She NEVER condemns bad feminist behavior - she always defends them and deflects with "but teh menz do it, too!"


do all the time.. doesn't fit your narrative, so you ignore it.. then go into derp mode
 
No, you really don't....I can do that thread comparison thing again... you didnt do so well last time... doubt things have changed much
You never did any such thread comparing my callouts of Republicans vs your callouts of radical feminists. You'd exceed Literotica's post size limits listing my callouts of Republicans.

You always fail when you try thread comparisons against me. You're especially going to fail this time.

Your bluff has been called.

Dude, you bash anyone that doesnt agree with you completely
I bash you. You're not everyone. Actually, it's more like you bash yourself.

No, you don't... I can count on one hand the number of times you've bashed him in 10 years
Which is more often than you've bashed radical feminists.

yup.. read the threads
What threads?

You post threads praising anti-feminists too
And this means what?

I have yet to find one praise worthy.. who exactly am I supposed to praise? name one

the MRA leadership is almost exclusively douchebags and right wing
Girl Writes What isn't a douchebag or a right winger. Oh yeah you like to make up shit about her.

You just proved my point. You declare all MRAs to be douchebags and right wingers. You show a zero tolerance policy for opposition and you've got the nerve to accuse me of that?

I said above that you characterize all MRAs as misogynist pigs and you just did exactly that. And then you cry like a baby when I post man-hating bullshit by people from your camp.

You
just
proved
my
point


do all the time.. doesn't fit your narrative, so you ignore it.. then go into derp mode
Okay, show us.
 
Back
Top