Holy shit the GOP in South Dakota tried to legalize killing ABORTION DOCTORS

[LJ_Reloaded]

Didn't see this shit. What the fuck. What's your excuse for this, GOP???

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/02/south-dakota-hb-1171-legalize-killing-abortion-providers

A bill under consideration in the Mount Rushmore State would make preventing harm to a fetus a "justifiable homicide" in many cases.

A law under consideration in South Dakota would expand the definition of "justifiable homicide" to include killings that are intended to prevent harm to a fetus—a move that could make it legal to kill doctors who perform abortions. The Republican-backed legislation, House Bill 1171, has passed out of committee on a nine-to-three party-line vote, and is expected to face a floor vote in the state's GOP-dominated House of Representatives soon.

You still planning on voting for the GOP in 2016?

 

[Rangudo]

legis.sd.gov/Legislative_Session/Bills/Bill.aspx?Bill=1171
South Dakota
South Dakota Seal · South Dakota Legislature ... The Bill: 1171 does not exist in the 2016 Session or isn't in a valid format. ^ Back to Top. Capitol Building, 3rd ...

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

legis.sd.gov/Legislative_Session/Bills/Bill.aspx?Bill=1171
South Dakota
South Dakota Seal · South Dakota Legislature ... The Bill: 1171 does not exist in the 2016 Session or isn't in a valid format. ^ Back to Top. Capitol Building, 3rd ...

I'm sure they voted it down in the end. But come on, they actually proposed this shit.

 

[about_average]

https://votesmart.org/bill/12722/fetus-protection-bill

 

[eyer]

Murder is murder, whether the State sanctions it or not...

...thus the proposed justifiable murder of a doctor who intentionally kills babies is just as intolerable to a civil society as the legal State-sanctioned justifiable murder doctors all over the nation commit thousands of times each and every day.

There exists no natural right of any individual to deprive an innocent individual of her/his inalienable right to life...

...murder is a crime against humanity itself.

Better would be a federal law which carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 25-Life for conviction on each count of murderous deprivation of the inalienable right to life a doctor commits...

...and a mandatory minimum of 10-20 for conviction on each count of conspiracy to commit murderous deprivation of the inalienable right to life a mother commits.

It's extremely amusing reading a progressive black championing that the most vulnerable among us have no rights at all...

...when that was the exact same hateful illogic which kept blacks rightless in this nation for so very long.

 

[FGB]

Did you think the Democrats are the only party that has crazies in it?

News flash. they are not.

Crazies abound in every organization.

Now if you are arguing the merits of certain legislation.


That is a completely different discussion.

 

[BotanyBoy]

There exists no natural right of any individual to deprive an innocent individual of her/his inalienable right to life...

If the right were inalienable it wouldn't need any legal protection at all......you're a moron.

Did you think the Democrats are the only party that has crazies in it?

No that has been most of the RW....you might say they aren't but you don't behave/post that way.

You're pretty much a hard line GOP bible thumper from biggotville Tejas.

 

[someoneyouknow]

Murder is murder, whether the State sanctions it or not...

...thus the proposed justifiable murder of a doctor who intentionally kills babies is just as intolerable to a civil society as the legal State-sanctioned justifiable murder doctors all over the nation commit thousands of times each and every day.

There exists no natural right of any individual to deprive an innocent individual of her/his inalienable right to life...

...murder is a crime against humanity itself.

Better would be a federal law which carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 25-Life for conviction on each count of murderous deprivation of the inalienable right to life a doctor commits...

...and a mandatory minimum of 10-20 for conviction on each count of conspiracy to commit murderous deprivation of the inalienable right to life a mother commits.

It's extremely amusing reading a progressive black championing that the most vulnerable among us have no rights at all...

...when that was the exact same hateful illogic which kept blacks rightless in this nation for so very long.

But it's perfectly okay for women to smoke, get drunk, do drugs or be obese while pregnant, right? Killing is bad but slowly poisoning or suffocating the unborn is still good? Who cares if the kid is deformed, has mental deficiencies or is even killed as result of the above so long as the government sticks its nose in people's private lives, right?

 

[eyer]

But it's perfectly okay for women to smoke, get drunk, do drugs or be obese while pregnant, right? Killing is bad but slowly poisoning or suffocating the unborn is still good? Who cares if the kid is deformed, has mental deficiencies or is even killed as result of the above so long as the government sticks its nose in people's private lives, right?

No.

No.

The primary purpose government is instituted among men is to secure every human's natural rights...

...in this case, the inalienable right to life itself.

I can't really think of any case at all that the federal government should stick its nose in, outside what it was intentionally empowered with by the Constitution...

...and I don't at all recognize a government that won't keep its nose precisely in what it was specifically instituted to protect.

So...

...what was your question again?

 

[rippitydoo]

Unless I'm wrong, abortion means killing... something.

Ergo, eye for an eye & all that jazz.

 

[phrodeau]

No.

No.

The primary purpose government is instituted among men is to secure every human's natural rights...

...in this case, the inalienable right to life itself.

I can't really think of any case at all that the federal government should stick its nose in, outside what it was intentionally empowered with by the Constitution...

...and I don't at all recognize a government that won't keep its nose precisely in what it was specifically instituted to protect.

So...

...what was your question again?

I'm not seeing that particular empowerment in the US Constitution. Can you provide an exact quote?

 

[eyer]

I'm not seeing that particular empowerment in the US Constitution. Can you provide an exact quote?

You mean like an activist Supreme Court majority, playdeau?

 

[badbabysitter]

Unless I'm wrong, abortion means killing... something.

Ergo, eye for an eye & all that jazz.

You can abort a soccer game.. and non of the players will die

You can abort knee surgery... and your doctor will not die

You can abort a mission in Call of Duty.. and game players will also not die

if you're talking about actual abortion of a fetus.. since it's not a person, no one k gets killed either


welcome to science

 

[badbabysitter]

Better would be a federal law which carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 25-Life for conviction on each count of murderous deprivation of the inalienable right to life a doctor commits...

a fetus is not a person... this is science... so shut up

...and a mandatory minimum of 10-20 for conviction on each count of conspiracy to commit murderous deprivation of the inalienable right to life a mother commits.

a fetus is not a person..this is fact... shut up

It's extremely amusing reading a progressive black championing that the most vulnerable among us have no rights at all...

because they're not people... stop being intentionally ignorant

...when that was the exact same hateful illogic which kept blacks rightless in this nation for so very long.

you literally not stated one logical thing that will disprove medical science

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

welcome to science

That's not science, that's an arbitrary definition of personhood.

You know, legal fiction

the same shit that defines corporations as persons (see: Hobby Lobby, etc.)

 

[badbabysitter]

That's not science, that's an arbitrary definition of personhood.

You know, legal fiction

the same shit that defines corporations as persons (see: Hobby Lobby, etc.)

no, it's science

until the fetus is roughly between 19 -22 weeks ( and that's on an individual fetus to fetus basis)..it literally has zero capacity to survive outside the host


anything before then is mostly goo

 

[about_average]

Murder is murder, whether the State sanctions it or not...

...thus the proposed justifiable murder of a doctor who intentionally kills babies is just as intolerable to a civil society as the legal State-sanctioned justifiable murder doctors all over the nation commit thousands of times each and every day.

You could be right. You could be wrong, but it's apples and oranges.

There are a few people who don't consider zygotes and embryos to be living human beings. It's a debatable "fact".

Show us a single person who thinks the doctors who perform abortions are not living human beings.

 

[eyer]

a fetus is not a person... this is science... so shut up



a fetus is not a person..this is fact... shut up



because they're not people... stop being intentionally ignorant

We're not talking about how others like you for so long viewed blacks, too...

...killer.

We're talking about human beings on their first journey of the universal human life cycle...

...a journey, in inarguable fact, that natural "science" dictates is the most fundamentally vital journey of the entire human life cycle itself.

Keep on keeping your godless need for demonizing human life alive as your preferred way to completely devalue it so as to artificially sate your starving ego's insatiable need to hate...

...40-50 million humans, the very most innocent, vulnerably rich in life among us, have been intentionally killed in the USSA since the Kangaroos' decision that 9 omnipotent wannabes define life, not the Creator of all life.

Just, of course, like the Kangaroos' also decided, once upon a time in the USSA...

...that "a" black "is not a person... this is science... so shut up", and "a" black "is not a person..this is fact... shut up", and "because they're not people", too.

Happy, killer?

Good.

Now...

...fuck back off to your residency in hateful human land.

 

[eyer]

You could be right. You could be wrong, but it's apples and oranges.

There are a few people who don't consider zygotes and embryos to be living human beings. It's a debatable "fact".

Show us a single person who thinks the doctors who perform abortions are not living human beings.

Scientific fact is:

Every human being shares the same two facts of life:

They're either alive or dead.

Your "zygotes and embryos" are the most alive of all humans, exponentially the very richest among us all in pure human life, as that rich human life is naturally growing toward its maturation (as all humans do at that most definite human stage of what is known as the human life cycle)...

...than your abortion "doctor", who has long past reached the human life cycle stage of maturation and is, in scientific fact, dying.

When your abortion "doctor" does die, he never loses his legacy of being human...

...yet, in order to keep your hate lust for killing your fellow human beings going, you must illogically deny by murder the most alive humans among us being human at all.

So...

...to support your illogically inapplicable, inhumane "debatable fact", you champion killing the most human among us.

Any argument that your "zygotes and embryos" aren't human at all is logically impossible...

...when they are, in scientific fact, the most rich in human life among us.

Until you salute that inarguable scientific fact...

...keep irrelevantly pimping that a human being who intentionally kills a completely innocent human being more rich in human life than her/himself, is somehow humanly superior anywhere outside your utopian Murderville.

That "doctor" who can't even honor the oath, whose killing ways you champion, is, like you...

...much, much, more of a human monster than an actual human being who loves his own kind, instead of murderously hating them.

 

[badbabysitter]

We're not talking about how others like you for so long viewed blacks, too...

science sees an adult black person as a person

it does not do so for a fetus

...killer.

We're talking about human beings on their first journey of the universal human life cycle...

no, we're talking about a clump of cells... otherwise you'd view cancer as sacred too and wouldnt want to stop that either

...a journey, in inarguable fact, that natural "science" dictates is the most fundamentally vital journey of the entire human life cycle itself.

which still does not mean a fetus is a person

Keep on keeping your godless need for demonizing human life alive as your preferred way to completely devalue it so as to artificially sate your starving ego's insatiable need to hate...

please dont bring your christian morality into science...facts dont change just because you have emotions about them

...40-50 million humans, the very most innocent, vulnerably rich in life among us, have been intentionally killed in the USSA since the Kangaroos' decision that 9 omnipotent wannabes define life, not the Creator of all life.

because they aren't people.....

Just, of course, like the Kangaroos' also decided, once upon a time in the USSA...

...that "a" black "is not a person... this is science... so shut up", and "a" black "is not a person..this is fact... shut up", and "because they're not people", too.

yes, and in those days they also didnt allow a woman to vote or make their own decisions and used leeches as vital part of treatment.......

guess what.... knowledge has grown, black people are people, women can vote, and leeches aren't a cure all...... yet you still cling to the past when it comes to your willfully ignorant understanding of the human reproduction system

you are the one living in the past with archaic outdated and completely uneducated views

Happy, killer?

at trying to educate someone trapped over 100 years in the past?

Good.

Now...

...fuck back off to your residency in hateful human land.

you hate a woman's right to choose.. and have chosen to remain ignorant about science

you're a dinosaur

 

[about_average]

Scientific fact is:
Blah Blah Blah

Nothing in your screed negates what I posted.

 

[rippitydoo]

You can abort a soccer game.. and non of the players will die

You can abort knee surgery... and your doctor will not die

You can abort a mission in Call of Duty.. and game players will also not die

if you're talking about actual abortion of a fetus.. since it's not a person, no one k gets killed either

You can not be sure... Many soccer players, etc. have died after those situations.

Also, fetus-es are persons if you don't kill them first! Not sure? Look in the mirror! 7 months ago, I was a year younger. Decades ago, fetus.

 

[eyer]

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/16/44/1b/16441bf581902ae32ecaa55c5b38928b.jpg
......."Mommy, PLEASE don't kill us...
............We promise we'll be good."


20-week-old twin girl "zygotes"/"embryos"...

...these non-humans have no rights at all and may be killed at will.

SPEECHLESS about this story..Woman 20 Weeks Pregnant With Twin Girls Has Abortion Last Week in Orlando, she already had girls and admitted she didn't want girls. Many offered to help financially or to adopt the baby girls, but she had an abortion anyway.

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/143833781818979584/

I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that his justice cannot sleep forever.

Thomas Jefferson

 

[Yardley]

You can not be sure... Many soccer players, etc. have died after those situations.

Also, fetus-es are persons if you don't kill them first! Not sure? Look in the mirror! 7 months ago, I was a year younger. Decades ago, fetus.

No wonder I am aging so fast lately. When did they do away with the 12 month year?!??

 

[rippitydoo]

No wonder I am aging so fast lately. When did they do away with the 12 month year?!??

Day after they removed your.... No, wait; Year has always been that long, but your head has always lacked that.