I'm sorry.. whats the big shit over Heathyr Hoffman??

According to her fetlife profile, here are all of the fetishes she is into.

*Cum for me, princess
*Anal sex
*Armbinders
*Ass play
*Beautiful eyes
*Begging
*Begging to orgasm
*Being a princess
*Being a sexual being
*Being a slut
*Being bitten, scratched, and bruised
*Being called a slut by someone who I adore
*Being fucked with a hand on my throat and threats whispered into my ear
*Being scared of you, in a good way
*Being told cum for me slut
*Being told I'm a good girl
*Being told I'm a beautiful princess but getting fucked like a dirty little whore
*Being whispered to during rough sex
*Belt whippings
*Bite marks
*Biting
*Bondage
*Bound and teased
*Breast/Nipple play
*Bruises
*Candle wax
*Chakra energy play
*Claws
*Corsets
*d/s
*Dildos
*Energy play
*Energy work
*Finger fucking
*Fingernails gently across my bare skin
*Flogging
*Geeks, hair pulling
*Handcuffs
*I know you can take it, beautiful
*I wanna fucking tear you apart
*Intelligence
*Knife play
*Knives
*Leather cuffs
*Leaving marks
*Making pain beautiful
*Multiple orgasms
*Neck biting
*Needle play
*Orgasm control
*Piercings
*Pussy spanking
*Rope bondage
*Rough sex
*Sacred sexuality
*Sacred whore
*Scratching
*Sensation play
*Sensual domination
*Sensual play
*Sex magick
*Spanking
*Spiritual BSDM
*Spiritual submission
*Spreader bars
*Squirting
*Strap-ons
*Strong, confident submissives and slaves who know they are worthless, unworthy, trash, worms, or any of that other stroke fodder nonsense
*Subspace
*Talking dirty
*Thinking I am too cute to punish
*Touchless orgasms
*Vampires
*Vampirism
*Verbal humiliation and degradation
*Vibrators
*Waking daddy up by grinding my ass against his cock so he'll wake up and take what belongs to him
*Breast bondage
*Chains, co-domination
*Co-topping
*Collar and lead/leash
*Corset piercing
*Cutting
*Edge play
*Leather restraints
*Sensory Deprivation
*Shibari
*Single tail whips
*Vampire gloves
*Whips
 
*Needle play

If she is into pin cushion cocks, then I may stalk her.
 
Disappointing. I thought this thread was about Heathyr doing scat play and getting someone to take a biiiiiiig dump on her.

Might've brought Vette back from self-exile! :D
 
Chrome gives out security alert if there's a virus. I cleared the cache and restarted my browser. It works fine now.

Looks like it couldn't handle the sight of "her". :rolleyes:



That made me spit out my coffee... too funny!!...
 
I made a similar comment on one of the other threads where a guy called out Mike for stalking her with a sign that says something like "Hey Mike I'm fugly". Right... So, the reason he SHOULDNT stalk her is because she's ugly. Okay, then.

I think she's quite stunning, personally. I don't think she should be stalked because she's a person with, you know, feelings and rights.

This is no place to have sane thoughts, ya know.
 
And he never confessed to a sexual relationship with a minor, or if he did, it's been deleted.
 
A couple of users will roll their eyes thinking that I'm inserting myself again into others' conversation. or generalizing.

But from a PERSONAL view - and of someone who's new to the forum - :
- I never saw Mike as being a dangerous stalker. To me, a few of his posts seemed actually funny.
- but what personally irked me were his posts where he compilled ugly things about Heathyr or where he engaged in slander.
 
I've followed some of his links over the years to twitter posts and facebook posts of these women complaining about their stalker from Arizona.

Nice try shifting responsibility. I've been outspoken enough on this asshole.


I'm not putting the onus on you alone, I'm asking generally. People keep saying he's done these things as if they are confirmed facts. So why aren't people showing this confirming evidence to Laurel?
 
I'm not going to argue those points though I could. I don't care.

Thing is. You have two years or more advance notice that this guy is hassling women in an age when internet stalking and bullying is forefront and sometimes an illegal act and it's certainly disruptive in these womens lives and online experiences.

Doing something after the fact is one thing, but watching this for two years and not even asking him to stop using your site for that purpose is crazy. What the hell. Can't you see what this guys doing? You've damned near put your stamp of approval on it by minimizing his postings.

I never suggested banning him. Just tell him to stop it.

So, present proof of what he's doing.
 
I'm not putting the onus on you alone, I'm asking generally. People keep saying he's done these things as if they are confirmed facts. So why aren't people showing this confirming evidence to Laurel?

The evidence is there for those who care to look.
 
So, present proof of what he's doing.

Are you serious? Im not Cheyenne or even interested in going back through his posts and links. Let one of the searchers or data-basers go after him.

Personally I don't need to even see any references to him on their sites. It's plainly obvious to me what he is doing.

Im pretty sure he even screen shotted twitter or FB posts from her talking about her nut stalker from AZ.

He's proud of this.
 
Fuck you, Mulder. I called your bluff, show your proof.

Not going to work on me Scully. It doesn't take a rocket scientist or a link to a post for any rationale person to get what he is up to.

I can't believe you are both going full dotted line on this deal.

You want proof and laureal wants the guys drivers license number to convince you the guys stalking women online? Seriously.

Take the blinders off.
 
I'm not putting the onus on you alone, I'm asking generally. People keep saying he's done these things as if they are confirmed facts. So why aren't people showing this confirming evidence to Laurel?

It's a good question. No one has ever contacted me via PM expressing concern about Mike or to show me information.

It's a little like Busybody. A few years back before people put him on Ignore, there used to be loads of posts about his used of the n-word, how he might shoot a Black person someday, etc. Yet no one contacted me privately.

When we first started the site back in '99, I'd never done anything like this before. And I'd get really stressed when people would post public criticisms of/complaints about site. I would immediately PM the person making the complaint, seeking clarification and trying to help. And I was dumbfounded when I'd receive no reply - until finally one day I found a terse answer from a user in my inbox: "Why are you PMing to me about this?"

Talking to other people who moderate communities, I discovered this is pretty much how it is. I realized that if people have a genuine concern about something, they will message us directly. If they're posting about it in public, they aren't expecting a reply or resolution.

So this may be what's happening here. In which case, I'm going to go do more productive/fun things. If the situation changes or someone feels there is reason to be genuinely concerned, please do PM me. :rose:
 
Are you serious? Im not Cheyenne or even interested in going back through his posts and links. Let one of the searchers or data-basers go after him.

Personally I don't need to even see any references to him on their sites. It's plainly obvious to me what he is doing.

Im pretty sure he even screen shotted twitter or FB posts from her talking about her nut stalker from AZ.

He's proud of this.

In more than a decade on the GB, haven't you ever noticed that not everybody is really who they say they are, or have really done things they've claimed?

I guess not, so just to catch you up, KRC and Karen Kraft were really men. LT didn't really die from eating a bad peanut. (I don't personally think he really shoot the neighbor's dog, either.) Scotty X didn't really have a Master's Degree in Literature.

But Mike Yates. well, everything he says is obviously true.
 
Back
Top