Eyer the sex offender apologist

[Recidiva]

I can be immature at times, but that's just my heart. My brain has the right age

let me just say .. If I were to shake your hand or kiss you on the cheek as Hello, Eyer would start a list about me too

Wait, what?

 

[smoothg103rd]

Wait, what?

I'm confused too. Lol

 

[eyer]

Eyer:

Again for the record (again as I've already said this multiple times): I don't think you were romantically involved with Grace.

That's swell, playgrounder cunt, that you admit once more you "don't think" something about nothing that ever was...

...and I guess if I were one of your Twatterville pals, I might also thank you for gracing me with that "don't think" "knowledge" of yours when I already know what a ton of crap it is.

Yet, you still sling your playgrounder cunt shit about it, and you fully support your fellow playgrounder cunts while they do the very same...

...while also intentionally pulling out of your ass your latest "a PM from Grace" crap to intentionally infer exactly what you just post you "don't think" above.

Fuck you and your "don't think" crap...

...until you stop slinging your playground cunt shit out of the other side of your mouth at the very same time, you'll wear a reciprocal target squarely between your eyes.

I do think it's odd that you told Grace she'd get no trouble from you but you insist that the rest of the Lit members who post with someone who's posted with Reci are complete scum.

That's simply because you're obviously much, much more interested in what you "think" than what I purposely, publicly post...

...it was the day or so after Grace was exposed as a sex offender to everyone on this Board that she PMd me to admit to me she was a registered sex offender and to tell me her side of the story.

Didn't you get a PM/email from her then, too? Like I also posted, I have to imagine that I was hardly the only one she reached out to at that very same time, since my relationship with her was so miniscule - especially compared to the intimate one you post you shared with her...

...haven't you also posted before that you know of many others who did, indeed, get mssgs from her at that very same time, too?

So I also got a mssg from Grace, and after admitting to me she was a sex offender, I did, indeed, tell her she'd get no trouble from me about...

...which is exactly what I've also publicly posted on this Board about how I would act toward the Sex Offender if she'd simply admit to what she originally and freely confessed, instead of proudly now still posting on this great adult Board on which her confessed act cannot be tolerated in the very least - it has to be totally deleted because of its blatant illegality.

And, I'll post it once more so you, and everyone else has another opportunity to deal with my words instead of the natural, contradictory "odd"ity of what you choose to "think" when you're so inherently biased about it:

If the Sex Offender finally admits that she did, as she originally posted, knowingly, intentionally, and carnally conduct an online relation with a minor, and then met up with hat same minor when he was still a minor and fooled around with him in the front seat of a car, and asks this Board for forgiveness for intentionally deceiving it about such an intolerably grievous matter...

...I can promise her, too, that she'd get no further trouble from me, either.

The Sex Offender fully understands that...

...and just yesterday, when that same offer was issued once again, she once more defiantly proclaimed about how proud she is of what she's done.

And, of course...

...your bestest playground cunt pal springs a little woody in his strapon each time he reads her do so.

So...

...there we all are with those same old piles of intolerably tepid crap.

Conversely...

...if Grace would've kept posting on this Board in the same hideously repulsive manner as the Sex Offender does currently, I would've ripped into her like a rabid pitbull, too.

What exactly is it that you "think" is so "odd" about that?

I find myself on the same side of the fence with you on the Reci issue. I can't stand her, I find her disgusting and her attitude of laughing off what she did and the story changing constantly but...

Again: as the old axiom goes...

...everything before the but is bullshit.

You post you "don't think" anything was going on between Grace and me...

...when, in fact, you know of nothing between Grace and me because there was nothing between Grace and me but for what I've openly posted on this Board and others have posted what Grace posted about me.

Yet, you - better than anyone - knowing that you know absolutely noting, still have the utterly losing need to continue to fling your own playground cunt "Grace" crap all over the place...

...and stay merrily posting with your fellow playground cunts as they do the exact same, playgrounder cunt thing.

Question, Wings:

Why do you and your pals keeping slinging your "Grace" playground cunt crap around...

...when you know it's not true at all?

I know the answer...

...are you woman enough to finally accept it and actually do something about it?

Relatedly...

...I can easily accept that you find the Sex Offender's carnal act and concurrent action on this Board "disgusting", basically because I truly cannot understand how any responsibly rational adult could find the Sex Offender's act anything but "disgusting".

But...

...in my worthless opinion, you don't consider it anywhere "disgusting" enough.

Why?

For one reason, because you state out of one side of your mouth that you don't believe there was anything between Grace and I...

...while out of the other side you still choose to sling your "Grace" playground cunt crap.

So, no...

...I do not believe you find the Sex Offender "disgusting" enough at all when it, too, flows from just one side of your mouth.

For if you truly did find it so disgusting...

...you would've long ago told your fellow playgrounder cunts that you can in no conscionable manner post casually with them on this Board at all - about anything - while they Support/Enable the Sex Offender in continuing her hideous charade that you claim "disgusts" you so much.

I'm SO tired of seeing her name pop up over and over again, you're not proving anything, you're just giving her the attention she craves.

I understand...

...you wish it would just all go away so you could still post just like always with your pals, but so many of them fully support and enable and are friends with who you claim disgusts you so much.

Wish I could pretend to hold empathy for your alleged grief...

...but you get the friends you deserve and I can do nothing but state that truth.

As for "proving anything":

Unlike you and your playgrounder cunt pals...

...I am so far satisfied with my sincere and continuing efforts to prove only what the Sex Offender's verbatim words state as the fact of the matter. Day-to-day, some are reading those hideous words for the first time - as long as I deal in only the truth, service is being provided to it.

Again...

...unlike you and your playground cunt pals concerning Grace and I.

As for your "attention" grief:

Despite all of our negativity about "attention" on this Board...

...I refuse to believe any poster of their own words (and, of course, a lot of times others') in any public place is not seeking attention of some nature. Why in the h3ll would any writer publicly publish if they weren't seeking the attention of others to read their words?

I, obviously, I'm regularly "slammed" with the amateur "attention" sling...

...and now you know why it never affects me in the least.

But, one more time...

...I truly feel your issue with "attention" in regards to the Sex Offender relates directly back to your same problem of just wishing it all would go away. It's not going away - unless Laurel chooses to tyrannically prohibit all discussion of it, and I can't imagine that even being possible as long as the Sex Offender continues to post here.

You don't like the "attention" I'm giving to the issue? Put me on ignore me and that problem is solved. Put others who make it an issue on ignore, too...

...but, then you'd have to ignore, too, all your playground cunt pals who enjoy posting with the Sex Offenders and others who enjoying posting with them - like yourself.

Yep...

...you definitely have a problem there.

BTW:

If you would like to herewith choose to fully cease your "Grace" playground cunt slinging...

...you'll get no further trouble from me about that.

Actual forgiveness is as if nothing ever happened in the first place...

...I'm fully capable of that.

Are you?

 

[smoothg103rd]

I can be immature at times, but that's just my heart. My brain has the right age

let me just say .. If I were to shake your hand or kiss you on the cheek as Hello, Eyer would start a list about me too

???????

 

[Recidiva]

If the Sex Offender finally admits that she did, as she originally posted, knowingly, intentionally, and carnally conduct an online relation with a minor, and then met up with hat same minor when he was still a minor and fooled around with him in the front seat of a car, and asks this Board for forgiveness for intentionally deceiving it about such an intolerably grievous matter...

...I can promise her, too, that she'd get no further trouble from me, either.

The Sex Offender fully understands that...

...and just yesterday, when that same offer was issued once again, she once more defiantly proclaimed about how proud she is of what she's done.

Eyer, you have to edit.

You will forgive me that I don't actually read everything and just came across this now, because I am accustomed to simple droning and copy and paste, it's nice to see you branching out.

First, you're not actually trouble. I'm having fun and I'm betting you are too.

I did apologize in the original thread for my phrasing and it upsetting people. I apologized to Laurel, I even offered to leave the site. It was an error, but not the error you think. I counted on a sense of humor that wasn't present, and understanding from friends that didn't exist. My only excuse was that it was to a friend whose thread I wanted to participate, though I had no actual crime.

And ironically if that thread hadn't exploded, I wouldn't have developed a lovely personal relationship with subdued_passion, so I don't regret it at all.

You're going to have to admit that perpetuating something ugly when you are the one without the truth is perhaps not the best thing for your own soul.

I have no actual crimes, eyer. So I can't do the sackcloth and ashes thingy here. You want truth, you got it. You just can't accept it. I explained and you believe me or you don't.

I'm not proud, I'm just not ashamed of being kinda dumb, because I can do that all the time, I'm a goofy sorta person.

You on the other hand have made things up, things based on fiction, and you're holding up a "truth" that is as real as the idea that my husband is a cuckold because you read a story I wrote once.

 

[Disgustipated]

That's swell, playgrounder cunt, that you admit once more you "don't think" something about nothing that ever was...

...and I guess if I were one of your Twatterville pals, I might also thank you for gracing me with that "don't think" "knowledge" of yours when I already know what a ton of crap it is.

Yet, you still sling your playgrounder cunt shit about it, and you fully support your fellow playgrounder cunts while they do the very same...

...while also intentionally pulling out of your ass your latest "a PM from Grace" crap to intentionally infer exactly what you just post you "don't think" above.

Fuck you and your "don't think" crap...

...until you stop slinging your playground cunt shit out of the other side of your mouth at the very same time, you'll wear a reciprocal target squarely between your eyes.



That's simply because you're obviously much, much more interested in what you "think" than what I purposely, publicly post...

...it was the day or so after Grace was exposed as a sex offender to everyone on this Board that she PMd me to admit to me she was a registered sex offender and to tell me her side of the story.

Didn't you get a PM/email from her then, too? Like I also posted, I have to imagine that I was hardly the only one she reached out to at that very same time, since my relationship with her was so miniscule - especially compared to the intimate one you post you shared with her...

...haven't you also posted before that you know of many others who did, indeed, get mssgs from her at that very same time, too?

So I also got a mssg from Grace, and after admitting to me she was a sex offender, I did, indeed, tell her she'd get no trouble from me about...

...which is exactly what I've also publicly posted on this Board about how I would act toward the Sex Offender if she'd simply admit to what she originally and freely confessed, instead of proudly now still posting on this great adult Board on which her confessed act cannot be tolerated in the very least - it has to be totally deleted because of its blatant illegality.

And, I'll post it once more so you, and everyone else has another opportunity to deal with my words instead of the natural, contradictory "odd"ity of what you choose to "think" when you're so inherently biased about it:

If the Sex Offender finally admits that she did, as she originally posted, knowingly, intentionally, and carnally conduct an online relation with a minor, and then met up with hat same minor when he was still a minor and fooled around with him in the front seat of a car, and asks this Board for forgiveness for intentionally deceiving it about such an intolerably grievous matter...

...I can promise her, too, that she'd get no further trouble from me, either.

The Sex Offender fully understands that...

...and just yesterday, when that same offer was issued once again, she once more defiantly proclaimed about how proud she is of what she's done.

And, of course...

...your bestest playground cunt pal springs a little woody in his strapon each time he reads her do so.

So...

...there we all are with those same old piles of intolerably tepid crap.

Conversely...

...if Grace would've kept posting on this Board in the same hideously repulsive manner as the Sex Offender does currently, I would've ripped into her like a rabid pitbull, too.

What exactly is it that you "think" is so "odd" about that?



Again: as the old axiom goes...

...everything before the but is bullshit.

You post you "don't think" anything was going on between Grace and me...

...when, in fact, you know of nothing between Grace and me because there was nothing between Grace and me but for what I've openly posted on this Board and others have posted what Grace posted about me.

Yet, you - better than anyone - knowing that you know absolutely noting, still have the utterly losing need to continue to fling your own playground cunt "Grace" crap all over the place...

...and stay merrily posting with your fellow playground cunts as they do the exact same, playgrounder cunt thing.

Question, Wings:

Why do you and your pals keeping slinging your "Grace" playground cunt crap around...

...when you know it's not true at all?

I know the answer...

...are you woman enough to finally accept it and actually do something about it?

Relatedly...

...I can easily accept that you find the Sex Offender's carnal act and concurrent action on this Board "disgusting", basically because I truly cannot understand how any responsibly rational adult could find the Sex Offender's act anything but "disgusting".

But...

...in my worthless opinion, you don't consider it anywhere "disgusting" enough.

Why?

For one reason, because you state out of one side of your mouth that you don't believe there was anything between Grace and I...

...while out of the other side you still choose to sling your "Grace" playground cunt crap.

So, no...

...I do not believe you find the Sex Offender "disgusting" enough at all when it, too, flows from just one side of your mouth.

For if you truly did find it so disgusting...

...you would've long ago told your fellow playgrounder cunts that you can in no conscionable manner post casually with them on this Board at all - about anything - while they Support/Enable the Sex Offender in continuing her hideous charade that you claim "disgusts" you so much.



I understand...

...you wish it would just all go away so you could still post just like always with your pals, but so many of them fully support and enable and are friends with who you claim disgusts you so much.

Wish I could pretend to hold empathy for your alleged grief...

...but you get the friends you deserve and I can do nothing but state that truth.

As for "proving anything":

Unlike you and your playgrounder cunt pals...

...I am so far satisfied with my sincere and continuing efforts to prove only what the Sex Offender's verbatim words state as the fact of the matter. Day-to-day, some are reading those hideous words for the first time - as long as I deal in only the truth, service is being provided to it.

Again...

...unlike you and your playground cunt pals concerning Grace and I.

As for your "attention" grief:

Despite all of our negativity about "attention" on this Board...

...I refuse to believe any poster of their own words (and, of course, a lot of times others') in any public place is not seeking attention of some nature. Why in the h3ll would any writer publicly publish if they weren't seeking the attention of others to read their words?

I, obviously, I'm regularly "slammed" with the amateur "attention" sling...

...and now you know why it never affects me in the least.

But, one more time...

...I truly feel your issue with "attention" in regards to the Sex Offender relates directly back to your same problem of just wishing it all would go away. It's not going away - unless Laurel chooses to tyrannically prohibit all discussion of it, and I can't imagine that even being possible as long as the Sex Offender continues to post here.

You don't like the "attention" I'm giving to the issue? Put me on ignore me and that problem is solved. Put others who make it an issue on ignore, too...

...but, then you'd have to ignore, too, all your playground cunt pals who enjoy posting with the Sex Offenders and others who enjoying posting with them - like yourself.

Yep...

...you definitely have a problem there.

BTW:

If you would like to herewith choose to fully cease your "Grace" playground cunt slinging...

...you'll get no further trouble from me about that.

Actual forgiveness is as if nothing ever happened in the first place...

...I'm fully capable of that.

Are you?

Did Grace The Convicted Sex Offender send you the same naked pics of herself that she sent her young victim?

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

Did Grace The Convicted Sex Offender send you the same naked pics of herself that she sent her young victim?

Jealous?

 

[Lord Pmann]

Jealous?

Are these sex offender tits something we should be jealous of? I am curious.

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

Are these sex offender tits something we should be jealous of? I am curious.

You want to see eyer's tits. Get in line behind pookie.

 

[eyer]

You on the other hand have made things up, things based on fiction, and you're holding up a "truth" that is as real as the idea that my husband is a cuckold because you read a story I wrote once.

As I instructed you the very first time you tried flying that same false flag, Sex Offender...

...I've never read any story of yours. But you keep pimping that same old shit as "truth" to your own sex offending piece of shit mind.

I'll post this once more so you can precisely point out to everyone exactly what "things" I've made up, and which of those "things" I've made up are based on "fiction":

The thread: Crimes of Passion

The thread question: "Commit any?"

"Carnal involvement with a minor, I imagine, in my case."

"There was a guy I knew on the internet when I was in my 20s. Good gamer, tough talker, smart and funny. Ran a BDSM bondage sideline of cyber. The kinda guy that who when someone was threatening to come to my house and rape me, would say "Hah. Tell him you don't think he could get you off."

He had a cover story that he was in his 30s but had confessed to one nice lady that he was only ** or so at the time. He and I became involved online and although I knew he how old he was, he didn't confess it for a few months, after which time I just said "Yes, I know."

I did get to meet him when his family traveled near to where I live, we met and fooled around a bit in the front seat of a car. I think he was ** at the time.

Seriously, I couldn't have corrupted this guy, if anything I rehabilitated him."

"Mid to late 20s if I recall correctly."

"Well, he was one of the guys I was messing around with at the same time, probably one in six."

"I had a roleplay relationship with him"

"...was it still outside of what is considered lawful? Yes."

"Do I think I could have been charged with a crime? Yep."

"If my daughter or son had a relationship with a person that much older, would I freak out? Hell yes."

Grab you cuckold...

...maybe he can help you point out every "thing" I've made up above, every "thing" that is "fiction".

Can you do that, Sex Offender...

...or, are you just going to settle once again for simply wallowing in the shit you keep blowing out of your Sex Offender ass.

 

[Recidiva]

As I instructed you the very first time you tried flying that same false flag, Sex Offender...

...I've never read any story of yours. But you keep pimping that same old shit as "truth" to your own sex offending piece of shit mind.

I'll post this once more so you can precisely point out to everyone exactly what "things" I've made up, and which of those "things" I've made up are based on "fiction":

The thread: Crimes of Passion

The thread question: "Commit any?"

Grab you cuckold...

...maybe he can help you point out every "thing" I've made up above, every "thing" that is "fiction".

Can you do that, Sex Offender...

...or, are you just going to settle once again for simply wallowing in the shit you keep blowing out of your Sex Offender ass.

I don't actually respond well to instructions sometimes.

So you just made up the cuckold part for fun?

 

[eyer]

You on the other hand have made things up, things based on fiction, and you're holding up a "truth" that is as real as the idea that my husband is a cuckold because you read a story I wrote once.

Grab you cuckold...

...maybe he can help you point out every "thing" I've made up above, every "thing" that is "fiction".

Can you do that, Sex Offender...

...or, are you just going to settle once again for simply wallowing in the shit you keep blowing out of your Sex Offender ass.

I don't actually respond well to instructions sometimes.

Totally understandable, Sex Offender.

It's gotta be hard to respond to anything/anyone...

...while you're fighting for your life not to drown in your own shit you keep blowing out of your sex offender ass.

So you just made up the cuckold part for fun?

It's 1 part of a 2-part set: it goes perfectly well with it's Village People-reject mate...

...but, I digress:

Shove your cuckold's head back down there...

...you know how much he adores trying to slurp up your messy, leftover shit, Sex Offender.

 

[Recidiva]

Totally understandable, Sex Offender.

It's gotta be hard to respond to anything/anyone...

...while you're fighting for your life not to drown in your own shit you keep blowing out of your sex offender ass.

It's 1 part of a 2-part set: it goes perfectly well with it's Village People-reject mate...

...but, I digress:

Shove your cuckold's head back down there...

...you know how much he adores trying to slurp up your messy, leftover shit, Sex Offender.

Hey, now, I'm not sure I like your tone.

 

[butters]

Hey, now, I'm not sure I like your tone.

but he's so very earnest, bless him.

 

[Recidiva]

but he's so very earnest, bless him.

I used to dislike him an awful lot and now I just want to know if he's warm, does he need a cookie.

Mom instincts. Not necessarily helpful.

It's the conversation tone that's just triggered "tantrum" and I can't get past it. I constantly get the urge to ask him if he needs a nap.

"So where did you get that fact?"

*incoherent screaming and stomping*

Uh huh.

Hey, let's leave that Big Wheel out in the drive and get a glass of juice, huh?

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

but he's so very earnest, bless him.

And oh so very brave. Talking shit that would get his ass handed to him if he had the courage to open his mouth to anyone in such a way in person.

The anonymity of the internet gives feckless cowards balls of steel.

 

[butters]

I used to dislike him an awful lot and now I just want to know if he's warm, does he need a cookie.

Mom instincts. Not necessarily helpful.

It's the conversation tone that's just triggered "tantrum" and I can't get past it. I constantly get the urge to ask him if he needs a nap.

"So where did you get that fact?"

*incoherent screaming and stomping*

Uh huh.

Hey, let's leave that Big Wheel out in the drive and get a glass of juice, huh?

cookies work for me

And oh so very brave. Talking shit that would get his ass handed to him if he had the courage to open his mouth to anyone in such a way in person.

The anonymity of the internet gives feckless cowards balls of steel.

everybody needs a hobby

and he'd forgive her if she'd only confess her sins
shades of the spanish inquisition and the comfy chair....

 

[Recidiva]

cookies work for me

everybody needs a hobby

and he'd forgive her if she'd only confess her sins
shades of the spanish inquisition and the comfy chair....

COOKIES! I have a barbecue sandwich too, and raspberries.

"You have no idea how many calories I burn putting up with your shit" - Claire Ayoub

 

[hashtag45]

Splitting

There are a few individuals on this site who do the splitting thing very well. So that people who would tolerate each other in real life, end up at each others' throats. I fell into their trap a few times

I don't get it - why don't people call them on it instead of focusing on the Eyer/Reci issue and fighting each other?
So that we could get on?

(in saying that, I don't know the history of the forum + the ins and outs)

 

[Recidiva]

There are a few individuals on this site who do the splitting thing very well. So that people who would tolerate each other in real life, end up at each others' throats. I fell into their trap a few times

I don't get it - why don't people call them on it instead of focusing on the Eyer/Reci issue and fighting each other?
So that we could get on?

(in saying that, I don't know the history of the forum + the ins and outs)

Because people are not here to be fair and objective. People are here to hang out with friends, make new ones, or sometimes people are here to be abusive because it's what they want to do.

They don't want to focus, that sounds like work. This is supposed to be fun.

Also, some people get a lot of social support here, enough so that they have real friends and real connections and histories.

Nobody should put that at risk over an argument this futile and silly.

 

[hashtag45]

Splitting in the forum

There are a few individuals on this site who do the splitting thing very well. So that people who would tolerate each other in real life, end up at each others' throats. I fell into their trap a few times

I don't get it - why don't people call them on it instead of focusing on the Eyer/Reci issue and fighting each other?
So that we could get on?

(in saying that, I don't know the history of the forum + the ins and outs)

I was actually hoping that more people would notice my posts. Seems like they don't.

If I were more courageous or with more experience in the forum, I would start parody threads re Splitting in the forum.

Hope that someone who's more visible than me would take this issue up.

 

[Recidiva]

I was actually hoping that more people would notice my posts. Seems like they don't.

If I were more courageous or with more experience in the forum, I would start parody threads re Splitting in the forum.

Hope that someone who's more visible than me would take this issue up.

They've got other people they're planning to talk to, usually. Don't take it personally.

It's hard to jump in because the relationships that you see on the surface are not the relationships that go on in private conversations or messages, phone or reality. You don't have access to everyone's history and although a lot of us have built up a sense of another poster through years of interaction, you're just starting.

I think the issue is definitely represented to exhaustive amounts.

Comes down to two simple issues:

1. Do you believe a stranger on the internet?

2. Are you willing to publically believe a stranger on the internet if it costs you personally? If so, why would you? For ideals? For companionship, for a conversation?

To some people I'm not as much of a stranger as to others.

 

[oggbashan]

...

Comes down to two simple issues:

1. Do you believe a stranger on the internet?

2. Are you willing to publically believe a stranger on the internet if it costs you personally? If so, why would you? For ideals? For companionship, for a conversation?

To some people I'm not as much of a stranger as to others.

I would add a third, fourth and fifth:

3. All you see are words on a screen. They can be misinterpreted, read with a different emphasis from that the writer intended, and can be the truth, lies, or a distorted view.

4. Most of us are using alts, not posting as the real person under our true identity. I'm not a several thousand-year old King who was a survivor of Noah's Flood; I'm not Henry VIII; nor am I jeanne_d_artois or Fag-Ash_Lil. But I post as all three. Which one do you trust and believe? Should you trust any of us?

5. Nothing that occurs on Literotica and particularly on the General Board is more important than real life.

 

[Wings]

I was actually hoping that more people would notice my posts. Seems like they don't.

If I were more courageous or with more experience in the forum, I would start parody threads re Splitting in the forum.

Hope that someone who's more visible than me would take this issue up.

Why do you care so much? Usually it takes a good bit of exposure to the GB before you can care about how it's splitting itself up.

I'm sure you're a perfectly nice person but you make me want to shout and that's not super.

 

[Recidiva]

I would add a third, fourth and fifth:

3. All you see are words on a screen. They can be misinterpreted, read with a different emphasis from that the writer intended, and can be the truth, lies, or a distorted view.

4. Most of us are using alts, not posting as the real person under our true identity. I'm not a several thousand-year old King who was a survivor of Noah's Flood; I'm not Henry VIII; nor am I jeanne_d_artois or Fag-Ash_Lil. But I post as all three. Which one do you trust and believe? Should you trust any of us?

5. Nothing that occurs on Literotica and particularly on the General Board is more important than real life.

Yes, the original issue regarding the subject at hand is that as far as "identity" goes online, I'm perfectly fine with you being Henry VIII or parodyluvr being a parrot. That's my roleplay and theater background, I'm fine with it. I'm less interested in specifics until or unless there's a rapport that spills into real life. Since the young man in question couldn't pass any level of "reality check" it stayed entirely roleplay until he was able to admit his age, then I could have an actual friendship with things like emails and phone calls. I've always had these checks in place. I would suggest everyone get these checks in place.

As an example Ulaven and I were an entirely roleplay friendship for years, knowing pretty much nothing about each other and making fun of the idea of being sure that we were who we said we were. Eventually he called me, then I was sure. Then I said "uh oh." Nice voice.

I've probably talked to about 20 people on the phone from Lit and I've met three of them. Those folks, and the guys that I get to know better consistently in private message become progressively more "real" as time goes by.

But no, none of it is more important than reality. These people can and have become reality, but they don't owe it to you.