Eyer the sex offender apologist

Lord Pmann

Lord
Joined
Mar 12, 2012
Posts
21,095
Eyer willfully engaged and interacted with a known sex offender, Grace.

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=68325899&postcount=59

He claimed ignorance and that he did not know, despite his obvious ability to search this forum for old posts. Sounds like pedo shit to me.

This thread is for raising awareness of eyer and his sex offender enabling.

Below is a list of all of eyer's friends:






Thank you for reading.
 
The General Board has been taken over by the sexual predators and sympathizers. I imagine it will be shut down soon.
 
It's almost like people are maybe not what they say they are sometimes.
 
Sometimes they are what they say they are and then try to redefine history when it all blows up in their face.
 
Sometimes they are what they say they are and then try to redefine history when it all blows up in their face.

History is what it is and I defined it, you don't believe it, and that's on you.

If this is blowing up in my face, this is AWESOME, my face loves it.
 
Feel free to put those who merrily post with eyer. The current list is empty, but I bet it will fill up soon!
 
Ann and Eyer are like peas and carrots these days.

Hmmm ...
 
Evolving list of those (GBers & Playgrounders & Chyoo members alike) who support an adult intentionally and knowingly conducting an online relationship with a known sex offender named Grace, and then meeting-up online with that same promiscuous pedophile woman in order to secretly indulge in sick, forbidden perversions through webcamming...

...who then continues to post unashamedly on the GB after blatantly lying and being disingenuous about his attraction to Grace and subsequent perfidy pertaining to reverse-engineering his shame:

Eyer the Sex Offender Apologist
Friends, Buddies, Ace Boons, Comrades and Compadres





Thank you for reading.

last flipped, mixed, chopped and screwed: 06JUN2015 1999DMZ
 
Evolving list of those (GBers & Playgrounders & Chyoo members alike) who support an adult intentionally and knowingly conducting an online relationship with a known sex offender named Grace, and then meeting-up online with that same promiscuous pedophile woman in order to secretly indulge in sick, forbidden perversions through webcamming...

...who then continues to post unashamedly on the GB after blatantly lying and being disingenuous about his attraction to Grace and subsequent perfidy pertaining to reverse-engineering his shame:

Eyer the Sex Offender Apologist
Friends, Buddies, Ace Boons, Comrades and Compadres





Thank you for reading.

last flipped, mixed, chopped and screwed: 06JUN2015 1999DMZ

Man, I just love those little details.
 
I don't really subscribe to fetishisms. I'm not one to be a slave to some cockeyed sexual perversion. Missionary for me. For creation only.
 
Feel free to put those who merrily post with eyer. The current list is empty, but I bet it will fill up soon!

This is possibly the first—and probably the only—time the adverb "merrily" was associated with eyer.
 
I don't really subscribe to fetishisms. I'm not one to be a slave to some cockeyed sexual perversion. Missionary for me. For creation only.

For someone who doesn't subscribe to fetishes, you and Eyer seem to be overly obsessed with one.
 
I bet Eeyore and Ken (ms) exchange child rape stories. Hey Ken, remember when you use to send private messages to women asking about their own rape experiences?
 
The whole premise of this thread is wrong.

Just because someone posts a response to another person's post does not indicate approval or disapproval of all the first poster's activities.

This thread has echoes of McCarthyism "Have you ever been a member of the Communist Party or associated with members of the Communist Party?". The answer to the first part should be 'No.", but to the second part "How the hell would I know?".

Ask any past or present US President if they have spoken to, met, or associated with people whose activities they disliked - they all have had to. Interacting with someone is not approval of their behaviour or condoning everything that person does. How can it be? We don't know everything about everyone.
 
The whole premise of this thread is wrong.

Just because someone posts a response to another person's post does not indicate approval or disapproval of all the first poster's activities.

This thread has echoes of McCarthyism "Have you ever been a member of the Communist Party or associated with members of the Communist Party?". The answer to the first part should be 'No.", but to the second part "How the hell would I know?".

Ask any past or present US President if they have spoken to, met, or associated with people whose activities they disliked - they all have had to. Interacting with someone is not approval of their behaviour or condoning everything that person does. How can it be? We don't know everything about everyone.

I'm sorry. Are you new here?
 
Back
Top