Not to sound like LJ...

VaticanAssassin

God Mod
Joined
Jul 21, 2011
Posts
12,391
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ers-fall-short-at-ranger-schools-darby-phase/

They shouldn't feel bad. 99% of the male population would fail. My issue is that they shouldn't be there in the first place. Getting a slot for this school is hard even if you are the most high speed individual in your grunt unit. The guys that do make it are already overachievers. I've seen marine recon idiots fail out. These ladies never even passed the minimum qualifications to get a shot.
 
Soon to be followed by cries for "gender norming" (relaxed standards).

Ishmael
 
Why aren't those bitches in the kitchen making dinner???

:mad:

No, you guys don't sound like LJ. At least some of L.J's posts were mildly creative.

Interesting that you picked a job that doesn't require too much brain, to illustrate your point.
 
Last edited:
No, you guys don't sound like LJ. At least some of L.J's posts were mildly creative.

Interesting that you picked a job that doesn't require too much brain, to illustrate your point.

Hmmm. Saint was obviously joking, so what is your issue with my post.

As far as not requiring too much brain...

Well as I don't know you I will just consider that a statement made in ignorance and not write you off as a idiot right away.
 
No, you guys don't sound like LJ. At least some of L.J's posts were mildly creative.

Interesting that you picked a job that doesn't require too much brain, to illustrate your point.

Who did you use to be, then?
 
that one was good, I hate to admit. ask my buddy JamesBJohnson
 
Last edited:
Saint Peter won't mind. He trolled a couple of my posts as well.
 
I used to be in the army, in more upper ranks

Is that so?

There is a grain of truth in what you said about intelligence, there are many army occupational specialties that require higher GT scores than Ranger School. So what?

Rangers are noted for their dogged persistence under grueling physical conditions under great stress. And that is how they are intended to be used. They operate in small units where the "weakest link" doctrine applies. 'Mental toughness' is required.

It's not just some 'merit badge' that you have to achieve to advance your military career as some politicians and other loud mouthed activists would like the general public to believe. Although I will readily admit that having as many 'merit badges' as possible in the combat arms is generally beneficial to ones career, especially commissioned officers. Obviously that implies that not having those 'merit badges' is a detriment to career advancement.

That being said, there is no excuse to relax requirements for no other reason than political brownie points. The job is dirty, grueling, and dangerous.....so the training should be as well.

Ishmael
 
Is that so?

There is a grain of truth in what you said about intelligence, there are many army occupational specialties that require higher GT scores than Ranger School. So what?

Rangers are noted for their dogged persistence under grueling physical conditions under great stress. And that is how they are intended to be used. They operate in small units where the "weakest link" doctrine applies. 'Mental toughness' is required.

It's not just some 'merit badge' that you have to achieve to advance your military career as some politicians and other loud mouthed activists would like the general public to believe. Although I will readily admit that having as many 'merit badges' as possible in the combat arms is generally beneficial to ones career, especially commissioned officers. Obviously that implies that not having those 'merit badges' is a detriment to career advancement.

That being said, there is no excuse to relax requirements for no other reason than political brownie points. The job is dirty, grueling, and dangerous.....so the training should be as well.

Ishmael

I don't actually believe that abt. the Army, I used them as an excuse.
was trying to get a rise out of Saint Peter, sounds like his avatar name was well chosen
 
Put 'em in coach, they're ready to play.

Eventually someone will be ready to pass.

What kind of sandwiches you guys want? I hope no vegans, I can't handle that. Grilled pastrami and cheese is what I can offer right about now.
 
Soon to be followed by cries for "gender norming" (relaxed standards).

Ishmael


I truly and honestly hope this doesn't happen. Not because I have a problem with women in combat, but because those standards are there for a reason. Speaking from a business point of view, with the resources of time and money spent to train, those men and women become high-end valuable capital assets. Just as you wouldn't under-spec a piece of equipment purchased for a specific job, you shouldn't relax standards for that job. Why would you buy a 3/4 ton pick up truck when what you really need is a Cat Triple 7?

As far as the women go, there are women who can, and will, meet the existing standards, and ultimately it's insulting to them to require them to do less.
 
I truly and honestly hope this doesn't happen. Not because I have a problem with women in combat, but because those standards are there for a reason. Speaking from a business point of view, with the resources of time and money spent to train, those men and women become high-end valuable capital assets. Just as you wouldn't under-spec a piece of equipment purchased for a specific job, you shouldn't relax standards for that job. Why would you buy a 3/4 ton pick up truck when what you really need is a Cat Triple 7?

As far as the women go, there are women who can, and will, meet the existing standards, and ultimately it's insulting to them to require them to do less.

These tests are often begun with the intention that nobody pass.

Good book, "The Heart and the Fist" describes a guy who was in the Peace Corps and then in the Navy SEALs.

It's not a problem if some people don't pass, and it's not "taking a spot" from somebody else because the trials go on and on, you can retake them. Nobody is missing an opportunity that they can't qualify for again.
 
These tests are often begun with the intention that nobody pass.

Good book, "The Heart and the Fist" describes a guy who was in the Peace Corps and then in the Navy SEALs.

It's not a problem if some people don't pass, and it's not "taking a spot" from somebody else because the trials go on and on, you can retake them. Nobody is missing an opportunity that they can't qualify for again.

Bullshit.

Individual units have competitions for the few ranger slots they receive. 100's of high speed individuals competing for a few slots per class. These women didn't earn the right to even try....
 
Bullshit.

Individual units have competitions for the few ranger slots they receive. 100's of high speed individuals competing for a few slots per class. These women didn't earn the right to even try....

Oh for God's sake, talk about whining.

Yes, it's competition. If things are unfair in battle, you can't whine that the committee watered down your training process. It is a process about overcoming the unfair.

If you're the fucking best, you're the fucking best. If you're not, go get to work.
 
Hmmm. Saint was obviously joking, so what is your issue with my post.

As far as not requiring too much brain...

Well as I don't know you I will just consider that a statement made in ignorance and not write you off as a idiot right away.
Oy vey.
 

((please ignore this message))

but 'm cracking up.
This thread is meant as a serious/normal debate, but no thread is immune to St. Peter's or Sean's banters if even the slightest mistakes are made
 
Back
Top