- Joined
- Nov 22, 2002
- Posts
- 92,832
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So as I understand it, this guy
Stole a car
committed a burglary
set fire to a church
did a home invasion robbery
stole a rifle and ammunition
fired the rifle
then pointed the rifle at officers.
If any of those are wrong or I left anything out, please correct me.
Given those circumstances, use of deadly force was authorized.
I've read elsewhere that people think the officer didn't have to be going that fast.
Here's the way that works.
You hit him too slow, he bounces in front of the car and you run him over.
Hit him a bit faster, he rolls up the hood, over the roof, may not land hard enough to be incapacitated.
Hit him a bit faster than that, he will fly over the roof and land pretty hard, and should be out of the fight.
Hit him too fast, you pin him to the grill like a bug, and then crush him into that wall.
All things considered, I think the officer did a hell of a job of it, without a lot of time to consider a lot of options.
Result was everyone lived. Some property was damaged. Property is replaceable, people are not.
I would rather be wrong in my diligence, than right in my ignorance
That dude is hoot. Worth a watch.
I'm certainly happy things worked out the way they did, but I think you're giving the officer waaaaay too much credit. I don't believe for one minute that he selected a specific ramming speed to consciously reduce the likelihood of the less desirable outcomes you've speculated.
He got lucky. Running over someone at that speed is no less likely to kill him than in an exchange of gunfire.
The use of lethal force being warranted in this circumstance is not the issue. The issue is the choice of lethal force and how it was specifically applied. I still think the officer's decision was highly questionable.
He'd been an officer for more than 10 years, I figure he's seen his share of vehicle accidents. And there is a nice chart to help you compute speed of vehicle versus pedestrian by determining how far up the pedestrian hit the hood, windshield, roof. Tools of the trade. It would be odd if, after 10 years as a street cop, he was not aware of it.
He choice a possibly lethal force that could not go through the suspect and half a mile down range with the change of hitting a bystander. One that could not ricochet of the gun the suspect was carrying and wind up who knows where? In short, he used a method that was safer for the rest of the public. IMHO, good choice.
CBS story relates that the incident occurred back on Feb. 19th and that the suspect had been on a crime spree and was suicidal. Most unbelievable of all, the suspect not only survived, but spent only two days in the hospital.
Thanks to the highly fortuitous outcome, the officer who ran over the suspect is now credited with "saving his life" since it appears the suspect may have been trying to commit "suicide by cop."
I guess you get to spin it that way when idiocy, against all odds, works out for the best.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/dashcam-video-shows-arizona-cop-car-ramming-armed-suspect/
Think about it, 300 million people in a country where everybody is allowed to carry a gun...
There's a chart? Seriously? I'm not calling you a liar, I've just never heard of such a thing. I'd love a link if you've got one.
There's a chart? Seriously? I'm not calling you a liar, I've just never heard of such a thing. I'd love a link if you've got one.
You should probably "Think about" adding something factual to the discussion...
...first.
30 seconds of checking brought this link to the book
http://books.google.com/books?id=-m_fb580Vx0C&pg=PA903&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false
Think about it, 300 million people in a country where everybody is allowed to carry a gun...
good luck with that dude
Had to stop at the bowel protrusion. How much puke is in my body? I'm about to find out.