ishtat
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2004
- Posts
- 5,761
Should Moral judgements ever be allowed to skew the National interest in determining Foreign Policy.
I believe that National interests should always have primacy, even if the result is very negative for other countries and peoples interests.
For example I think that there is an arguable case for acting on the basis that it is in the National interest of the USA to preserve and maintain the current conflict in the Middle East. From a moral point of view all parties to the conflict of every description are pretty obnoxious. Perhaps the best outcome for the immediate future is to ensure that they are fully occupied in fighting and killing each other - but making sure that no - one wins. Any thoughts?
I believe that National interests should always have primacy, even if the result is very negative for other countries and peoples interests.
For example I think that there is an arguable case for acting on the basis that it is in the National interest of the USA to preserve and maintain the current conflict in the Middle East. From a moral point of view all parties to the conflict of every description are pretty obnoxious. Perhaps the best outcome for the immediate future is to ensure that they are fully occupied in fighting and killing each other - but making sure that no - one wins. Any thoughts?