Jindal’s Call To Ban Radical Islamists From Entering America Is “Fearmongering”…

Busybody

We are ALL BUSYBODY!
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Posts
55,323
U.S. Muslim Groups Say Gov. Bobby Jindal’s Call To Ban Radical Islamists From Entering America Is “Fearmongering”…


are they saying that RADICAL ISLAMISTS should be allowed to enter the US?:confused:
 
U.S. Muslim Groups Say Gov. Bobby Jindal’s Call To Ban Radical Islamists From Entering America Is “Fearmongering”…


are they saying that RADICAL ISLAMISTS should be allowed to enter the US?:confused:

:cool:
 
Welcome to the United States
This form must be completed by every nonimmigrant visitor not in possession of a visitor's visa.
Do any of the following apply to you? (Answer Yes or No)
A. Do you have a communicable disease; physical or mental disorder; or are you a drug abuser or addict?
B. Have you ever been arrested or convicted for an offense or crime involving moral turpitude or a violation related to a controlled substance; or ever been arrested or convicted for two or more offenses for which the aggregate sentence to confinement was five years or more? Or been a controlled substance trafficker; or are you seeking entry to engage in criminal or immoral activities?
C. Have you ever been or are you now involved in espionage or sabotage; or terrorist activities; or genocide; or between 1933 and 1945 were you involved, in any way, in persecutions associated with Nazi Germany or its allies?

---from the current DHS I-94W form.
 
Of course, everyone regardless of motive has a right to come here.

That's not true. There are millions of people in The Philippines who would love to emigrate to the US, but they are not allowed in. Even two of my wife's daughters and four grandchildren had a sixteen year wait before they were allowed to join us. :eek:

But on the subject of the thread: Why should we let in those people who hate us and have vowed to destroy us? :confused: Additionally, a Muslim fundie has very likely committed acts that would be illegal in the US, such as assaulting his wife or other women under his control.
 
Last edited:
Welcome to the United States
This form must be completed by every nonimmigrant visitor not in possession of a visitor's visa.
Do any of the following apply to you? (Answer Yes or No)
A. Do you have a communicable disease; physical or mental disorder; or are you a drug abuser or addict?
B. Have you ever been arrested or convicted for an offense or crime involving moral turpitude or a violation related to a controlled substance; or ever been arrested or convicted for two or more offenses for which the aggregate sentence to confinement was five years or more? Or been a controlled substance trafficker; or are you seeking entry to engage in criminal or immoral activities?
C. Have you ever been or are you now involved in espionage or sabotage; or terrorist activities; or genocide; or between 1933 and 1945 were you involved, in any way, in persecutions associated with Nazi Germany or its allies?

---from the current DHS I-94W form.


It won't be long before they can drop or rewrite C.
 
That's not true. There are millions of people in The Philippines who would love to emigrate to the US, but they are not allowed in. Even two of my wife's daughters and four grandchildren had a sixteen year wait before they were allowed to join us. :eek:

But on the subject of the thread: Why should we let in those people who hate us and have vowed to destroy us? :confused: Additionally, a Muslim fundie has very likely committed acts that would be illegal in the US, such as assaulting his wife or other women under his control.

why is Obama allowing 100K plus Muslims into US?
 
Does a "radical" Muslim state they are radical when the they try to enter the country? Guilty before proved innocent? Error on the side of caution to protect citizens? No easy answers. "the needs of the many out way the needs of the few or the one"? (to quote Spock of star trek).
 
Does a "radical" Muslim state they are radical when the they try to enter the country? Guilty before proved innocent? Error on the side of caution to protect citizens? No easy answers. "the needs of the many out way the needs of the few or the one"? (to quote Spock of star trek).

:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top