U
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the cunt should be ISIS'edWe tried to tell the starry eyed fools but, they insisted on being fools:
Insured, but Not Covered
By ELISABETH ROSENTHALFEB. 7, 2015
WHEN Karen Pineman of Manhattan received notice that her longtime health insurance policy didn’t comply with the Affordable Care Act’s requirements, she gamely set about shopping for a new policy through the public marketplace. After all, she’d supported President Obama and the act as a matter of principle.
Ms. Pineman, who is self-employed, accepted that she’d have to pay higher premiums for a plan with a narrower provider network and no out-of-network coverage. She accepted that she’d have to pay out of pocket to see her primary care physician, who didn’t participate. She even accepted having co-pays of nearly $1,800 to have a cast put on her ankle in an emergency room after she broke it while playing tennis.
But her frustration bubbled over when she tried to arrange a follow-up visit with an orthopedist in her Empire Blue Cross/Blue Shield network: The nearest doctor available who treated ankle problems was in Stamford, Conn. When she called to protest, her insurer said that Stamford was 14 miles from her home and 15 was considered a reasonable travel distance. “It was ridiculous — didn’t they notice it was in another state?” said Ms. Pineman, 46, who was on crutches.
She instead paid $350 to see a nearby orthopedist and bought a boot on Amazon as he suggested. She has since forked over hundreds of dollars more for a physical therapist that insurance didn’t cover, even though that provider was in-network.
The Affordable Care Act has ushered in an era of complex new health insurance products featuring legions of out-of-pocket coinsurance fees, high deductibles and narrow provider networks. Though commercial insurers had already begun to shift toward such policies, the health care law gave them added legitimacy and has vastly accelerated the trend, experts say.
The theory behind the policies is that patients should bear more financial risk so they will be more conscious and cautious about health care spending. But some experts say the new policies have also left many Americans scrambling to track expenses from a multitude of sources — such as separate deductibles for network and non-network care, or payments for drugs on an insurer’s ever-changing list of drugs that require high co-pays or are not covered at all.
The rest of the story here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/sunday-review/insured-but-not-covered.html&assetType=opinion&_r=2
She's outraged that she has to travel FOURTEEN miles to see a doctor?
THIS, folks, is what our Vettebigot is reduced to whining about.
By way of contrast, I travelled 23 miles yesterday (each way) to see a doctor of my choosing. Oh, and I made the appointment to see her last Friday, thereby goring yet another Vettebigot sacred cow that insuring #ThosePeople would make it impossible to see your doctor in a timely manner.
The worst part of my doctor visit? The magazines in the doctor's waiting room were up to EIGHT MONTHS OLD!
#ThisIsAnOutrage !
Blue Cross/Blue Shield is the exact same whether you get it from the exchange, or by suckling at the teet of your employer. No difference. None. Exactly the same.
So in essence, the article is about how private insurance sucks and should be eliminated.
I agree.
VetteBigot unknowingly argues in favor of single payer.![]()
VetteBigot unknowingly argues in favor of single payer.![]()
The true conservative position is to eliminate the cost of employee health care from our businesses. But vette isn't really a conservative.
He'll never actually read the body of the stuff he C&Ps, but it can always be said that Vette's never met a headline that he didn't like.![]()
Blue Cross/Blue Shield is the exact same whether you get it from the exchange, or by suckling at the teet of your employer. No difference. None. Exactly the same.
So in essence, the article is about how private insurance sucks and should be eliminated.
I agree.
Blue Cross/Blue Shield is the exact same whether you get it from the exchange, or by suckling at the teet of your employer. No difference. None. Exactly the same.
So in essence, the article is about how private insurance sucks and should be eliminated.
I agree.
In VetteBigot's defense he would have to get out of his armchair, walk ALL THE WAY ACROSS THE ROOM to get his readin' spectacles.
Who has time for that? Just read the big headline.![]()
My wife runs a dietary program out of a doctors office and also does the majority of the billing.
She said this is nothing short of a nightmare with who is covered, who isn't, what they will cover, its a damn joke, it was 'unleashed' while it wasn't even close to being complete and as always its the people who suffer.
We tried to tell the starry eyed fools but, they insisted on being fools:
Insured, but Not Covered
By ELISABETH ROSENTHALFEB. 7, 2015
WHEN Karen Pineman of Manhattan received notice that her longtime health insurance policy didn’t comply with the Affordable Care Act’s requirements, she gamely set about shopping for a new policy through the public marketplace. After all, she’d supported President Obama and the act as a matter of principle.
Ms. Pineman, who is self-employed, accepted that she’d have to pay higher premiums for a plan with a narrower provider network and no out-of-network coverage. She accepted that she’d have to pay out of pocket to see her primary care physician, who didn’t participate. She even accepted having co-pays of nearly $1,800 to have a cast put on her ankle in an emergency room after she broke it while playing tennis.
But her frustration bubbled over when she tried to arrange a follow-up visit with an orthopedist in her Empire Blue Cross/Blue Shield network: The nearest doctor available who treated ankle problems was in Stamford, Conn. When she called to protest, her insurer said that Stamford was 14 miles from her home and 15 was considered a reasonable travel distance. “It was ridiculous — didn’t they notice it was in another state?” said Ms. Pineman, 46, who was on crutches.
She instead paid $350 to see a nearby orthopedist and bought a boot on Amazon as he suggested. She has since forked over hundreds of dollars more for a physical therapist that insurance didn’t cover, even though that provider was in-network.
The Affordable Care Act has ushered in an era of complex new health insurance products featuring legions of out-of-pocket coinsurance fees, high deductibles and narrow provider networks. Though commercial insurers had already begun to shift toward such policies, the health care law gave them added legitimacy and has vastly accelerated the trend, experts say.
The theory behind the policies is that patients should bear more financial risk so they will be more conscious and cautious about health care spending. But some experts say the new policies have also left many Americans scrambling to track expenses from a multitude of sources — such as separate deductibles for network and non-network care, or payments for drugs on an insurer’s ever-changing list of drugs that require high co-pays or are not covered at all.
The rest of the story here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/sunday-review/insured-but-not-covered.html&assetType=opinion&_r=2
My roommate who works sometimes more than one job usually at minimum wage isn't eligible for "Obama Care" because she doesn't make enough money.
She has graves disease, has had four stints installed,seven aneurysm, and two heart attacks.
She can't afford to take off work for six months to apply for disability like her doctors advise.
So what does it take to be eligible?
And just who is Obama care designed for?
You're full of shit. I had zero income and qualified.
Not necessarily. His roomie sounds like she's fallen victim to Governor Rick Perry's "Fuck Those Mexicans" initiative.
Remember, Texas is one of those states that declined to accept expanded Medicaid. (Dead poor babbies are a sacrifice we have to make to ensure a permanent Republican majority...).
Texas therefore runs under the "old" draconian Medicaid rules (MediCAID is state, not Federal, remember). Basically Texas says if you have a job, you don't qualify for Medicaid. Obamacare subsidies don't kick in until a certain income level (which is why "expanded Medicaid" exists), but FGB's buddy is someone who fell in the "no coverage" gap: Too "rich" for Medicaid, too poor for Obamacare subsidies.
FGB, the only solution your buddy has right now is to move to an enlightened state that has expanded Medicaid. Texas will eventually be dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century, but not anytime this year.
My roommate who works sometimes more than one job usually at minimum wage isn't eligible for "Obama Care" because she doesn't make enough money.
She has graves disease, has had four stints installed,seven aneurysm, and two heart attacks.
She can't afford to take off work for six months to apply for disability like her doctors advise.
So what does it take to be eligible?
And just who is Obama care designed for?
My wife runs a dietary program out of a doctors office and also does the majority of the billing.
She said this is nothing short of a nightmare with who is covered, who isn't, what they will cover, its a damn joke, it was 'unleashed' while it wasn't even close to being complete and as always its the people who suffer.
She has graves disease, has had four stints installed,seven aneurysm, and two heart attacks.
She can't afford ...
You're full of shit. I had zero income and qualified.
Come tell her that to her face.
She been itching to Taser someone.
Of course that sort of thing never happened before ACA.
Millions didn't have healthcare tho. Many had preexisting conditions that made it impossible to even get any.
No one has ever claimed ACA was perfect... Just imagine what would have happened if the right wing obstructionists hadn't fought it every step of the way.
Of course it's nice to see you're worried about this woman having a problem.![]()