POTUS mis speaking.

KUJACK

Literotica Guru
Joined
May 15, 2008
Posts
2,237
At a prayer breakfast today, POTUS siad that Isis is similar to to killing in the name of Jesus Christ during the Crusades. Really? He will rue that muttering.
 
Last edited:
At a prayer breakfast today, POTUS siad that Isis is similar to to killing in the name of Jesus Christ during the Crusades.

So it is. What is your point?

To this day jihadists call the Western powers "Crusaders" . . . it's certainly not a name we should want to own.
 
The crusade

So it is. What is your point?

To this day jihadists call the Western powers "Crusaders" . . . it's certainly not a name we should want to own.

The crusades were 1000 years a go and were in response to islamic insurgents in the world. Obama's exact statement was"Lest we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ," he added. "In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ." May be true. but Jesus never said kill the infedels. The koran does.
 
Last edited:
***********************************************************************************!

Edited for common sense.

Fuck him.

God bless the Secret Service!
 
So

They were not insurgents. They were the legitimate rulers of Palestine at the time.

Are you an Islamic terrorism apolgist? Killing children, executing women for not obeing their husbands, burning a member of their own religion and televising it, beheading anyone who dares to oppose them? I guess you think that the USA and the rest of the world deserves this. Obama is Neville Chamberlain.
 
Are you an Islamic terrorism apolgist? Killing children, executing women for not obeing their husbands, burning a member of their own religion and televising it, beheading anyone who dares to oppose them? I guess you think that the USA and the rest of the world deserves this. Obama is Neville Chamberlain.

:rolleyes: I was talking about the Crusades. Not ISIS.
 
Yeah

:rolleyes: I was talking about the Crusades. Not ISIS.

The crusades were a black spot on humanity, But who is spreading international terror now? Even Jordan is pissed off! Maybe we should not call it a crusade now, but more like stop killing in the name of god!
 
What was actually said..

"Unless we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ," Obama said Wednesday. "And in our home country, slavery, and Jim Crow, all too often was justified in the name of Christ."
Obama made the comments while giving a major speech on religion at the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, D.C. Citing Islamic, Jewish, and Christian scripture, Obama touted his own faith.

"This prayer tradition has brought us together, giving us the opportunity to come together in humility before the Almighty and to be reminded of what it is that we share as children of God," he said. "And certainly for me this is always a chance to reflect on my own faith journey. No matter the challenge He has been there for all of us. He certainly strengthened me through the power of his spirit."

Obama went on to condemn violent jihadists who are "betraying" Islam. He specifically called out the Islamic State group that has "carried out unspeakable acts of barbarism" in the Middle East and the militants who recently massacred the employees of the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo.

"This is not unique to one group or one religion," Obama cautioned. "There is a tendency in us, a sinful tendency, that can pervert and distort our faith. And in today's world when hate groups have their own Twitter accounts and bigotry can fester in hidden places in cyberspace, it can be even harder to combat such intolerance. But God compels us to try."


Where exactly did the President say anything wrong?
 
The crusades were a black spot on humanity, But who is spreading international terror now? Even Jordan is pissed off! Maybe we should not call it a crusade now, but more like stop killing in the name of god!

Of course we should not call it a crusade, that word is toxic in the MENA. If we go to war with ISIS we needn't call it anything but a war; the causes are well known and need no branding, and for once we'll have the majority of the region's people on our side (unless we call it a crusade).
 
Time for truth. The Crusades were an answer to centuries of Islamic atrocities committed against Christians in the Middle East. The President in his failed defense of Islam, his failed attempt at a moral equivalency between radical Islam and Christianity, forgot to tell you that. He had to go back to 1095 in order to stupidly fail. In history Jesus Christ was never a terrorist, Muhammad however was indeed a terrorist. Obama forget to tell you that as well. In the here and now, today, there is no moral equivalency between any part of Christianity and the excesses of Islam.

The world has a problem with Islam. The world doesn't have a problem with Christianity, except in the minds of Barack Obama and people like Louie Farrakhan, the Reverend Wright and Frank Marshall Davis, his mentors.

This President and his inner circle, their support for Islam, their protection of Islam, their coddling of radical Islam, their desire to belittle the threat they represent and play down their crimes, are becoming the biggest threat to the national security of the United States.

LOL!!!!:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Time for truth.

I don't see you answering post #11.

In history Jesus Christ was never a terrorist, Muhammad however was indeed a terrorist.

Terrorist? He was a conqueror, a general with an army. As such, by the standards of the day he was entitled to massacre the vanquished, which he did on at least one occasion I know of (some Jewish tribes), because in his time and place leaving a defeated enemy alive (and unconverted) was a formula for a multi-generational blood-feud. But that's not what we mean now by "terrorism," it's what Robespierre meant by "terrorism," state terror (in those days rebels using terror tactics were called "incendiaries"). Today, "terrorism" is a tactic resorted to by factions too weak to win their goals on the battlefield or at the ballot box; that was not Muhammad.
 
That statement is so ridiculous, it is almost hysterically funny.

He was not any more of a terrorist, than any of your old Bible patriarchs, were.
 
. . . their desire to belittle the threat they represent . . .

Which makes a lot more sense than exaggerating it.

7 Reasons Why America’s Wars Aren’t Ending Anytime Soon:

5. Threat inflation: There’s nothing new about threat inflation. We saw plenty of it during the Cold War (nonexistent missile and bomber gaps, for example). Fear sells and we’ve had quite a dose of it in the twenty-first century, from ISIS to Ebola. But a more important truth is that fear is a mind-killer, a debate-stifler.

Back in September, for example, Senator Lindsey Graham warned that ISIS and its radical Islamic army was coming to America to kill us all. ISIS, of course, is a regional power with no ability to mount significant operations against the United States. But fear is so commonplace, so effectively stoked in this country that Americans routinely and wildly exaggerate the threat posed by al-Qaeda or ISIS or the bogeyman du jour.

Decades ago, as a young lieutenant in the Air Force, I was hunkered down in Cheyenne Mountain during the Cold War. It was the ultimate citadel-cum-bomb-shelter, and those in it were believed to have a 70% likelihood of surviving a five-megaton nuclear blast. There, not surprisingly, I found myself contemplating the very real possibility of a thermonuclear exchange with the Soviet Union, a war that would have annihilated life as we knew it, indeed much of life on our planet thanks to the phenomenon of nuclear winter. You’ll excuse me for not shaking in my boots at the threat of ISIS coming to get me. Or of Sharia Law coming to my local town hall. With respect to such fears, America needs, as Hillary Clinton said in an admittedly different context, to “grow a pair.”
 
Which makes a lot more sense than exaggerating it.

7 Reasons Why America’s Wars Aren’t Ending Anytime Soon

5. Threat inflation: There’s nothing new about threat inflation. We saw plenty of it during the Cold War (nonexistent missile and bomber gaps, for example). Fear sells and we’ve had quite a dose of it in the twenty-first century, from ISIS to Ebola. But a more important truth is that fear is a mind-killer, a debate-stifler.

Back in September, for example, Senator Lindsey Graham warned that ISIS and its radical Islamic army was coming to America to kill us all. ISIS, of course, is a regional power with no ability to mount significant operations against the United States. But fear is so commonplace, so effectively stoked in this country that Americans routinely and wildly exaggerate the threat posed by al-Qaeda or ISIS or the bogeyman du jour.

Decades ago, as a young lieutenant in the Air Force, I was hunkered down in Cheyenne Mountain during the Cold War. It was the ultimate citadel-cum-bomb-shelter, and those in it were believed to have a 70% likelihood of surviving a five-megaton nuclear blast. There, not surprisingly, I found myself contemplating the very real possibility of a thermonuclear exchange with the Soviet Union, a war that would have annihilated life as we knew it, indeed much of life on our planet thanks to the phenomenon of nuclear winter. You’ll excuse me for not shaking in my boots at the threat of ISIS coming to get me. Or of Sharia Law coming to my local town hall. With respect to such fears, America needs, as Hillary Clinton said in an admittedly different context, to “grow a pair.”


If you had been around in November 1941, would you have said the same thing about the Axis? On September 10, 2001 would you have said the same thing about Al Qaeda?
 
If you had been around in November 1941, would you have said the same thing about the Axis? On September 10, 2001 would you have said the same thing about Al Qaeda?
If you had been around in November 1938, would you have said the same thing about the Jews?
 
If you had been around in November 1938, would you have said the same thing about the Jews?

What thing was that? :confused: I don't believe I have ever mentioned the Jews, although I have expressed admiration for Israel.
 
Was this mispeaking anything like Palin rambling incoherently more than usual when her teleprompter broke?
 
What thing was that? :confused: I don't believe I have ever mentioned the Jews, although I have expressed admiration for Israel.
You mentioned how powerful and dangerous you think Muslims are. In 1938, it was the Jews who were labeled powerful and dangerous.
 
The crusades were 1000 years a go and were in response to islamic insurgents in the world. Obama's exact statement was"Lest we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ," he added. "In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ." May be true. but Jesus never said kill the infedels. The koran does.



these obama kind are mentally fucked in the head. they are comparing something happened yesterday to something that happened 1,000 years ago.


obama and those who like him are not real american's
 
Back
Top