At least 11 Dead in Paris

[oggbashan]

Ogg is the voice of Neville Chamberlain appeasers.

Look to your own. Would the US have declared war on Japan before Pearl Harbor? The US was full of appeasers, including in government.

The US didn't declare war on Japan. Japan struck first.

The US didn't declare war on Germany. Germany declared war on the US.

Who are you to call us 'appeasers'?

 

[Busybody]

Look to your own. Would the US have declared war on Japan before Pearl Harbor? The US was full of appeasers, including in government.

The US didn't declare war on Japan. Japan struck first.

The US didn't declare war on Germany. Germany declared war on the US.

Who are you to call us 'appeasers'?

NC was

if not for WC, you could have been in huge do do

 

[oggbashan]

JBJ and S Sam are providing justification to the jihadis by advocating killing ALL Muslims.

They are enablers for the jihadis, recruitment poster boys, and therefore should be on their own execution lists.

 

[Busybody]

JBJ and S Sam are providing justification to the jihadis by advocating killing ALL Muslims.

They are enablers for the jihadis, recruitment poster boys, and therefore should be on their own execution lists.

that is a TYPICAL LIB PC talk

its OUR FAULT!...cause if WE would SHUT UP, they wouldn't kill us

is THAT what you are saying?

study

STRONG HORSE/WEAK HORSE....and see why only I have solution

 

[oggbashan]

NC was

if not for WC, you could have been in huge do do

Even with WC, we were in huge do do.

If Winston Churchill had been appointed Prime Minister in 1938, the time of Munich, he couldn't have done any more than Neville Chamberlain. He would not have had the backing of Parliament, given France's refusal to act.

France had the land forces that could have stopped Germany. The UK had the naval power, but we had agreed with France that the French Navy would defend the Mediterranean.

Without French support, what could the UK do? Invade Germany's short North Sea coastline while facing the largest and best equipped army in the world at that time?

 

[Busybody]

that is a TYPICAL LIB PC talk

its OUR FAULT!...cause if WE would SHUT UP, they wouldn't kill us

is THAT what you are saying?

study

STRONG HORSE/WEAK HORSE....and see why only I have solution

Muslims THRIVE on weakness

and

Shrivel in face of strength

 

[Busybody]

Even with WC, we were in huge do do.

If Winston Churchill had been appointed Prime Minister in 1938, the time of Munich, he couldn't have done any more than Neville Chamberlain. He would not have had the backing of Parliament, given France's refusal to act.

France had the land forces that could have stopped Germany. The UK had the naval power, but we had agreed with France that the French Navy would defend the Mediterranean.

Without French support, what could the UK do? Invade Germany's short North Sea coastline while facing the largest and best equipped army in the world at that time?

WC had what we don't have now

COURAGE TO CALL IT LIKE IT IS

WE SHALL NEVER SURRENDER...etc

 

[oggbashan]

that is a TYPICAL LIB PC talk

its OUR FAULT!...cause if WE would SHUT UP, they wouldn't kill us

is THAT what you are saying?

study

STRONG HORSE/WEAK HORSE....and see why only I have solution

I've had enough. You are calling for genocide. If you can't see how stupid that is, how it gives comfort to OUR enemies, then you are beneath contempt.

 

[Busybody]

I've had enough. You are calling for genocide. If you can't see how stupid that is, how it gives comfort to OUR enemies, then you are beneath contempt.

we ALL had enough

of the TERROR

and US BEING THE BUTT OF EM

 

[oggbashan]

WC had what we don't have now

COURAGE TO CALL IT LIKE IT IS

WE SHALL NEVER SURRENDER...etc

And he knew it was bullshit when he said it. At the time we were losing the war. If not for the Battle of Britain, Germany could have invaded the UK and we hadn't got much to stop them.

We had lost our armour, our aircraft, our artillery, even our rifles, trying to defend France.

 

[Busybody]

your anger IS MISPLACED

but its easier to attack ME....(CLEGG)....then to attack them...WE are harmless

 

[Busybody]

And he knew it was bullshit when he said it. At the time we were losing the war. If not for the Battle of Britain, Germany could have invaded the UK and we hadn't got much to stop them.

We had lost our armour, our aircraft, our artillery, even our rifles, trying to defend France.

nt the point

HE STOOD FAST

Gave EVERYONE BACKBONE/HOPE

 

[butters]

I've had enough. You are calling for genocide. If you can't see how stupid that is, how it gives comfort to OUR enemies, then you are beneath contempt.

and yet your patience was admirable.

i gave up attempting to have anything resembling a discussion with them some while back.

 

[Busybody]

and yet your patience was admirable.

i gave up attempting to have anything resembling a discussion with them some while back.

yes, because AFTER the tube attacks you said we have to dial-a-log


and I kept asking

DIAL A LOG with WHO about WHAT?

you couldn't answer


you spew typical LIB BS....that will kill us

 

[richard_daily]

We had lost our armour, our aircraft, our artillery, even our rifles, trying to defend France.

There's a lesson there... but one that busybody will certainly miss.

 

[Busybody]

There's a lesson there... but one that busybody will certainly miss.

tell me

if you dare

WHAT IS THE LESSON?

 

[richard_daily]

tell me

if you dare

WHAT IS THE LESSON?

Unlike your buddy 2bob, I'm not a coward.

The lesson is that when you get involved in other people's battles, it often costs you in near insurmountable fashion.

Feel free to apply that as you're able.

 

[Busybody]

Unlike your buddy 2bob, I'm not a coward.

The lesson is that when you get involved in other people's battles, it often costs you in near insurmountable fashion.

Feel free to apply that as you're able.

that isn't the lesson at all...DUMMY

and England WASNT fighting SOMEONE else's battle

 

[Busybody]

Daily Beast Columnist: No Difference Between Islamic Clerics Inciting Violence And “Crazy Fundamentalist” Christian, Jewish, And Hindu Preachers…




I can think of a few minor differences.

Via Nesbusters:


It’s not enough to read the transcript. You really need to view the video to appreciate the depths of Christopher Dickey’s world-weary, dismissive, preening political correctness. Asked on today’s Morning Joe to comment on Muslim preachers inciting violence from their pulpits, Dickey of The Daily Beast sniffed that the problem is “exaggerated,” claimed that the number of violent Muslims is “infinitesimally small” [down even from the “minuscule” number he cited last week], and engaged in the most fraudulent form of moral equivalency, saying that there are also crazy Christian, Jewish and Hindu preachers who incite their congregations. […]

DICKEY And in terms of incitement to violence, I think that’s generally exaggerated. But of course there are a lot of, you know, what would you call?, fundamentalist preachers in the Muslim world, just as there are crazy fundamentalist preachers in many other relgions: Hinduism, Christianity, Judaism who will try to incite their congregations. I think it’s an exaggeration here in France and indeed certainly in the United States to believe that they are finding a lot of followers who are embracing violence. The number of people who actually embrace violence, not just talk trash, but try to actually carry out terrorist events is infinitesimally small. And I think we have to differentiate between anger and violence because there is a gap there, and actually that’s part of what keeps us as safe as we are.

 

[Que]

Daily Beast Columnist: No Difference Between Islamic Clerics Inciting Violence And “Crazy Fundamentalist” Christian, Jewish, And Hindu Preachers…




I can think of a few minor differences.

Via Nesbusters:


It’s not enough to read the transcript. You really need to view the video to appreciate the depths of Christopher Dickey’s world-weary, dismissive, preening political correctness. Asked on today’s Morning Joe to comment on Muslim preachers inciting violence from their pulpits, Dickey of The Daily Beast sniffed that the problem is “exaggerated,” claimed that the number of violent Muslims is “infinitesimally small” [down even from the “minuscule” number he cited last week], and engaged in the most fraudulent form of moral equivalency, saying that there are also crazy Christian, Jewish and Hindu preachers who incite their congregations. […]

DICKEY And in terms of incitement to violence, I think that’s generally exaggerated. But of course there are a lot of, you know, what would you call?, fundamentalist preachers in the Muslim world, just as there are crazy fundamentalist preachers in many other relgions: Hinduism, Christianity, Judaism who will try to incite their congregations. I think it’s an exaggeration here in France and indeed certainly in the United States to believe that they are finding a lot of followers who are embracing violence. The number of people who actually embrace violence, not just talk trash, but try to actually carry out terrorist events is infinitesimally small. And I think we have to differentiate between anger and violence because there is a gap there, and actually that’s part of what keeps us as safe as we are.

One of those "Crazy Christian Preachers" looking to "incite" was none other than the good Reverend Jeremiah Wright.

So which is it? Preachers like that are nothing to be alarmed about, or they are, but only so much as it excuses the Muslim clerics?

 

[Busybody]

we were told to ignore Wright, he was former US military

plus Obola was sleeping

 

[Busybody]

French police say at least 6 terror cells still out there

The SAS is patrolling streets in England

And THE PROBLEM is the stuff Sam writes......

 

[contrifan32]

It was too late, given speed of communication at the time.

Thats a bit different explanation then what you suggested... which is why I don't agree with your original thought.

Oh and Rob, if I wanted your two cents I would have asked for it... which is extremely unlikely.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Thats a bit different explanation then what you suggested... which is why I don't agree with your original thought.

Oh and Rob, if I wanted your two cents I would have asked for it... which is extremely unlikely.

Kindly go fuck yourself, chum! The ignore button is your friend.

 

[Busybody]

We hear so much about Moderate Muslims

Never

Moderate Jews, Christians, Mormons, Buddists, etc


Wonder why that is