Why is the media promoting transgenderism so heavily?

In a nation where "anything goes" and "whatever you think is right something" has to go.

Yes we value FREEDOM in this country, why do you want it to go?

He has a common three letter name...starts with a capital G.

God has no and never has had any legal authority in the US of A......what is it about that you bible thumpers don't understand?:confused:

True, but the transgender community is so small and to me, it makes it so ridiculous

Soooo minority = subhuman....good to know where your morality bar sits.

So you think that 1.5 million people being viewed as less than human means it makes sense that we should have a year long media crusade campaigning for their acceptance?

1.5 million people out of 320 million?

Yep...any minority that is mistreated should be rubbed in America's face.

How many people live in poverty here and as such are also viewed as less than human? About 40 million. Where are the shows for them? Where are the magazine articles?

Nope, your theory does not hold up. It is something else.

Years of legislation, a war against poverty and trillions in welfare......plenty of shows have been done on inequality in America, it's been beat to death. However getting poor folks to not go blow their money on a bunch of stupid shit isn't as easy as making sure under the law at least that everyone is treated equally.

Transgender discrimination is a relatively easy fix compared to the economy/wealth distribution issues.

Sorry, your assumption is lame and doesn't hold up...it's not something else. It's pretty basic and simple.

When it is covered in preference over what is normal and main stream.

Who gets to decide what is "normal" in a free country? YOU???:confused:
 
Are you really the best person to be making proclamations about what is normal?

I make no implication, of course.
 
It's like those old '60s-70s "documentaries" on nudism or sexual activities. If you frame it as "educational" or "human rights", you can cover all the salacious bits and people can watch feeling like they're being "educated" (or, back in those days, afraid they're going to get arrested for obscenity), and that watching makes them all open-minded and crap - when all they really want is to see what it looks like when you turn a penis inside out.

http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/736x/1b/1a/35/1b1a3560c70c5ad7735b74047695dcc9.jpg
 
So you think that 1.5 million people being viewed as less than human means it makes sense that we should have a year long media crusade campaigning for their acceptance?

1.5 million people out of 320 million?

How many people live in poverty here and as such are also viewed as less than human? About 40 million. Where are the shows for them? Where are the magazine articles?

Nope, your theory does not hold up. It is something else.

Everywhere? Especially right now, around the holidays. What are you talking about?

And something you mentioned in the OP... I have NEVER understood why sports are segregated by gender. It's weird and totally sounds like something that should be illegal. If you can't compete against athletes regardless of gender, you have no business playing sportsball in the first place. Psychology Today tackles that question and can't come up with a better reason than "Sexist bullshit" since actual gender differences among athletes are negligible it's a social segregation and not a physical one. So... idk. It's weird to mention that transgender women would somehow magically be good at sports. That's just... odd.

But I haven't actually noticed transgender issues being in the forefront now more than they ever have. That might be because I was always aware of it and just never noticed that there were more people waking up. Trans folks have been fighting for their rights for years, and it's been a really difficult battle. Part of that is that we assign gender at birth, which psychologists have known for decades can fuck kids up really bad, since gender rolls are social constructs and have not shown to have any good implications and tons of bad ones. And they change from culture to culture, so it's annoying to have something considered masculine, like textile arts, in a native community, and then have that be considered feminine in a white community. It's annoying for gardening to be masculine in a rural area but feminine in an urban area. And it can fuck you up if you hit those transitions as a child, because even tho they're arbitrary, we place a lot of value on gender identity. For... reasons that have never been adequately explained by psychology or sociology. Since they have no benefit whatsoever. Sociologists have been pushing for years to do away with labels in stores for toys, because it makes no sense whatsoever to label toys by gender rather than interest, and is a determent to children.

So it really isn't just transgendered people who are affected by the things that they're fighting for, so limiting the scope of those types of things to just that segment of the population is in error.
 
Are you really the best person to be making proclamations about what is normal?

I make no implication, of course.

If you disagree with me, and think it is perfectly healthy to cut your dick off, so be it. I expect few people to publicly agree with me on this thread.
 
And some of the shit that they're trying to do is also shit that parental groups have been trying to do for years. I fucking hate public bathrooms. So fucking much. And I'm gonna bring this up because trans folk are also fighting for them and because I was talking to my mom about this earlier today, actually. I was asking her how old we were when she let us go to the bathroom by ourselves because I can remember her standing outside the door, screaming at me, because she is a crazy bitch, that I was going to get molested and that she was gonna come in there if I didn't pee faster. Which is... fucking insane. But it also makes sense. "Send your child into a room full of strange adults to pull their pants down".

Fucking... why?

And now I've got a kid who is also not allowed in the bathroom with me. And there are urinals in the men's rooms, so I kinda don't wanna take her in there because people have their dicks out- and that's just... I've been socialized to think she doesn't need to see that. And she's getting to where she can talk now.

Basically... how fucking hard is it to make co-ed or, like we call them when they're not in schools, "family" bathrooms? Because not having them is annoying as fucking shit. And I notice that in the city they have them EVERYWHERE! But here, even restaurants are like, "Oh you need to change your daughter's diaper? Well she's gonna see stranger dick!"

This was just aggravating the shit out of me earlier because I had to go out to do some shit this morning and couldn't find anywhere to change a fucking diaper. Which is not something that you can put off. Baby vaginas are really, really bad at not getting infections if you leave them sitting in shit. Just... fyi. I did not know that prior to having a kid. But... they are. You can't drive around looking for a changing table. Sometimes you gotta go in the lady's room and the ladies can fuck off. Bitesize is a lady.
 
The percentage of transgenders is 0.05% of the population or less.

You have answered your own question. They're the rarest of all the human species, the one who's isolated and separated from the world. They're strange, people won't notice common issues. Hence, they will feed the news.
 
And something you mentioned in the OP... I have NEVER understood why sports are segregated by gender. It's weird and totally sounds like something that should be illegal. If you can't compete against athletes regardless of gender, you have no business playing sportsball in the first place.

Because girls want to play games too, and would like to do so without winding up in the ICU.

Not all games are like that...but certainly the full contact ones. I guess that standard just carried over to the e z stuff like Tennis.

Oh wait nope...the meanest girls in Tennis even got fuckin' creamed so bad it wasn't even fun to watch.
 
Last edited:
You have answered your own question. They're the rarest of all the human species, the one who's isolated and separated from the world. They're strange, people won't notice common issues. Hence, they will feed the news.

You know... I guess that's something that we get from being raised in a democracy. "There are fewer of them. So fuck them." Is something that I think gets engrained in you from being raised thinking that you do what the majority wants, what's been voted in, even if it fucks everybody over. I'm not sure how you fix that, tho. Even as a little kid if you have a disagreement, the first thing you do is 'take a vote'. It's not really cool to take a vote on someone else's body.
 
Because girls want to play games too, and would like to do so without winding up in the ICU.

Not all games are like that...but certainly the full contact ones. I guess that standard just carried over to the e z stuff like Tennis.

Oh wait nope...the meanest girls in Tennis even got fuckin' creamed so bad it wasn't even fun to watch.

Then they don't need to play football at all. It's not like they're more likely to wind up in the ICU, that's what the article I linked to was about. Men wind up in the ICU too. They wouldn't be MORE hurt because they played with guys as long as they trained the same. But apparently they also often aren't required to train the same... which is also weird. But I don't know from sportsball. I don't play. I just know the studies done on human endurance and strength and whatnot don't show significant differences based on gender or biological sex, but they do show differences based on things like willingness to train. And I kinda think if you aren't up to par with other athletes and get punished for it, that's on you.
 
Doesn't bother me. I'm also glad that Laverne Cox and Janet Mock are at the forefront of this new recognition/definition movement. They're saying good stuff in the smartest way without allowing or giving space for ignorance to take over the narrative.

Cox has said something to the effect that most people don't know how to process transgenders because society up until this point has indoctrinated you to think it's a purely sexual aberration that exists in/for pornography and the sex life instead of a personal lifestyle using the freedom and choice to redefine your identity into what you feel most comfortable being.

For many people, porn is the only reference they have to those existing outside the "norm" and it's a shitty way to learn about others different from you. Not everyone is gonna understand or accept this and it's small steps going forward like all social movements that seek to improve the lives of a minority.

Let people live, basically. It's never gonna actually damage the stat quo. Whenever I walk in the city, I'm still bombarded by images of cis white women, usually blonde, thin and leggy, as THE de facto standard of beauty and THE social definition of "woman." I seriously doubt I'll ever see that media paradigm change up completely in my lifetime.
 
Yo, BotanyBoy

I was almost finished answering you when my computer ate them.

I would like to know where all that stuff goes...it happens pretty often.

Anyway, Tough for now. Maybe later I'll do it all again.
***************************************************************
For instance about that normal thingy.

Just so happens myself and thirty or so other people had a two hour discussion about what "Normal" might be.


What is "Normal" Depends on what Society accepts as the average result of a situation at particular place and time in history. Or as it is perceived by the masses due to the efforts of the media.

Since you asked.
 
Because it's sex-related, controversial, sensational, and thus sells magazines.

Gay/lesbian isn't edgy enough to grab the average supermarket shopper's eye anymore.

I'd think something so controversial would make people refuse to buy it.
 
Everywhere? Especially right now, around the holidays. What are you talking about?

And something you mentioned in the OP... I have NEVER understood why sports are segregated by gender. It's weird and totally sounds like something that should be illegal. If you can't compete against athletes regardless of gender, you have no business playing sportsball in the first place. Psychology Today tackles that question and can't come up with a better reason than "Sexist bullshit" since actual gender differences among athletes are negligible it's a social segregation and not a physical one. So... idk. It's weird to mention that transgender women would somehow magically be good at sports. That's just... odd.
.

So what you are saying is that people who are born men do not have a bigger body frame and more muscle mass than people who are born women? That physically, all things are equal?
 
Then they don't need to play football at all. It's not like they're more likely to wind up in the ICU, that's what the article I linked to was about.

Men wind up in the ICU too.

Well that's sexist...why not let them play in their own league? Pee wee? It's not like NFL or NOTHING is reasonable in any sort of way. Sorry but that's just asshole nuts.

Further more put a bunch of 100-160lb women on the field against the Seattle Seahawks.....a bunch of 250-350 Lb 6'+ guys.

They would get fucking DESTROYED. DE- FUCKIN- STROYED.

They wouldn't be MORE hurt because they played with guys as long as they trained the same.

Buuu shit.

But apparently they also often aren't required to train the same... which is also weird.

Because they can't....it's not weird.

Bt I don't know from sportsball. I don't play. I just know the studies done on human endurance and strength and whatnot don't show significant differences based on gender or biological sex, but they do show differences based on things like willingness to train.

That must be why so many women are kicking ass in the special forces schools and beating men 2x their size down in UFC on a regular basis right? :rolleyes:

IDC what your article says, on the high extreme end of physical fitness and athleticism there are VERY few realms in which women can compete with men.

None of them are in the brute strength category.
 
You know... I guess that's something that we get from being raised in a democracy. "There are fewer of them. So fuck them." Is something that I think gets engrained in you from being raised thinking that you do what the majority wants, what's been voted in, even if it fucks everybody over. I'm not sure how you fix that, tho. Even as a little kid if you have a disagreement, the first thing you do is 'take a vote'. It's not really cool to take a vote on someone else's body.

I think you are absolutely right, this is exactly the way a democracy is. Maybe that is the point of what we are seeing today? Ending democracy?
 
Yo, BotanyBoy

I was almost finished answering you when my computer ate them.

I would like to know where all that stuff goes...it happens pretty often.

Anyway, Tough for now. Maybe later I'll do it all again.
***************************************************************
For instance about that normal thingy.

Just so happens myself and thirty or so other people had a two hour discussion about what "Normal" might be.


What is "Normal" Depends on what Society accepts as the average result of a situation at particular place and time in history. Or as it is perceived by the masses due to the efforts of the media.

Since you asked.

Ok so then let me ask you this.

Why is "normal" a requirement for you to treat someone like a human fucking being? :confused:
 
So what you are saying is that people who are born men do not have a bigger body frame and more muscle mass than people who are born women? That physically, all things are equal?

Yes. There's more variation within genders than cross-genders. If I had a full-blood female sibling, her stats would be nearly equal mine. If I were female, the hormonal difference is not great enough to change base stats. It's the training that changes them. In fact, there have been long-term studies that show that this is cultural. My culture is actually a good example of this. Cherokee women, at least in the Eastern Band, play football really well. This is because they aren't conditioned to think that they can't. I know that Karmaloff-Smith did some cross-cultural studies with infants, and parents thought and encouraged male children- AS YOUNG AS THREE MONTHS OLD to do more dangerous and trying physical tasks than female children. They were perceived as being able to train more, as being more physically capable far before there would be ANY gender difference whatsoever, because that doesn't even kick in until puberty.
 
Since when is 'reporting' or 'noting' the same as 'promoting?'

promotion = advertising = keeping people aware of shit

Its a psychological fact that people embrace what theyre exposed to often enough. Its why I believe youre a stupid shit. I see you all the time.
 
Back
Top