GOP-Led Benghazi Panel Bolsters Administration

BettyPoop

Literotica Guru
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Posts
2,053
On Friday, the GOP-led House Intelligence Committee had NOT intentionally misled the public about what occurred during the attacks in talking points for officials and TV.

Sorry, teatards.
 
"Found no evidence" is kind of the same thing as "bolsters the administration," "fully exonerates," or "found no wrongdoing."

So congratulations on that. See you when the Select Committee issues its report, right around October 2016.
 
Last edited:
On Friday, the GOP-led House Intelligence Committee had NOT intentionally misled the public about what occurred during the attacks in talking points for officials and TV.

Sorry, teatards.

The tea tards will never accept that the black guy did his job.

Just look at the 2 tards above...
 
"Found no evidence" is kind of the same thing as "bolsters the administration," "fully exonerates," or "found no wrongdoing."

So congratulations on that. See you when the Select Committee issues its report, right around October 2016.

You guys work slow.
 
Betty, Oreo and Jen all in a room. Quick, let's sneak out and lock the door.
 
The cowardly vettebigot lacks the personal integrity to admit that he was wrong about Benghazi.
 
James Clapper
Republicans demand consequences for 'willful lie' by intelligence chief

• Seven congressmen take issue with James Clapper's testimony
• Obama administration unlikely to turn against director

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/19/republicans-consequences-james-clapper-testimony

The cowardly Vettebigot, lacking the personal honor and integrity to admit he was wrong about Benghazi, tries to steer the conversation away from Benghazi to the NSA debacle.

Because freedom.
 
Show me where I was wrong.

The republican-led intelligence committee report shows that virtually all of the talking points that you faithfully regurgitated here for the past year have been proven to be untrue.

Yet you lack the personal honor and integrity to admit that you were wrong.
 
So how do you know he didn't lie to them about Benghazi?

Any perceived inaccuracy any poster makes is worth bringing up ad nauseum forever. Pointing out the witness was caught lying under oath for political reasons on one occasion, and is suspect in this instance is "deflection."
 
The cowardly vettebigot lacks the personal integrity to admit that he was wrong about Benghazi.

It's like the WMDs in Iraq. There are some that still think they will find them.

The search continues ...
 
Rob is too naive to understand what that report was all about. He's an idiot if he can't see the weasel words in this statement:

Finally the Committee found no evidence that any officer was intimidated, wrongfully forced to sign a nondisclosure agreement or otherwise kept from speaking to Congress, or polygraphed because of their presence in Benghazi. The Committee also found no evidence that the CIA conducted unauthorized activities in Benghazi and no evidence that the IC shipped arms to Syria.

9/11 was a false flag operation too. Just because they have yet to find evidence doesn't mean fuck!

You just wait ... one more investigation ...
 
Back
Top