Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Perjured testimony and redacted documents don't make it easy either.
On Friday, the GOP-led House Intelligence Committee had NOT intentionally misled the public about what occurred during the attacks in talking points for officials and TV.
Sorry, teatards.
"Found no evidence" is kind of the same thing as "bolsters the administration," "fully exonerates," or "found no wrongdoing."
So congratulations on that. See you when the Select Committee issues its report, right around October 2016.
You guys work slow.
Slow like a fox.
Perjured testimony . . .
James Clapper
Republicans demand consequences for 'willful lie' by intelligence chief
• Seven congressmen take issue with James Clapper's testimony
• Obama administration unlikely to turn against director
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/19/republicans-consequences-james-clapper-testimony
Show me where I was wrong.
So how do you know he didn't lie to them about Benghazi?
So how do you know he didn't lie to them about Benghazi?
The cowardly vettebigot lacks the personal integrity to admit that he was wrong about Benghazi.
So how do you know he didn't lie to them about Benghazi?
Rob is too naive to understand what that report was all about. He's an idiot if he can't see the weasel words in this statement:
Finally the Committee found no evidence that any officer was intimidated, wrongfully forced to sign a nondisclosure agreement or otherwise kept from speaking to Congress, or polygraphed because of their presence in Benghazi. The Committee also found no evidence that the CIA conducted unauthorized activities in Benghazi and no evidence that the IC shipped arms to Syria.