Moon Landings. Well?....

duranman

Literotica Guru
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Posts
2,207
Were they bollocks or not? It seems every conspiracy theory programme seems to be American. It's funny but as an 8 year old when seeing Neil Armstrong I remembered wondering if it was just a studio. But in those days I believed in Captain Scarlett...
 
I think it was done on a sound-stage in Cuba with technicians brought in for the job from Sicily.
 
I have no idea what technology would be required to broadcast live from the moon. I have always accepted it on faith that one could do that, then.

For the sake of discussion what if you couldn't. For example the equipment required was too heavy to be practical.

What if they went to the moon AND staged the broadcast?


Edit... It finally queued up. NICELY done, phrodeau!
 
Last edited:
I have no idea what technology would be required to broadcast live from the moon. I have always accepted it on faith that one could do that, then.

For the sake of discussion what if you couldn't. For example the equipment required was too heavy to be practical.

What if they went to the moon AND staged the broadcast?

They had been putting sophisticated cameras into space to spy on the Russians for about a decade and a half; those were the launch vehicles that lead to Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo. Schriever's ICBMs...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Adolph_Schriever

We had sophisticated light-weight cutting-edge cameras.
 
Were they bollocks or not?

Little of both. The Moon landings were real. The footage broadcast was filmed in a sound studio in Burbank. This was done only to cover up the real mission of the Apollo program (to sell Tang to the Selenites in exchange for Velcro and digital-watch technology).
 
Little of both. The Moon landings were real. The footage broadcast was filmed in a sound studio in Burbank. This was done only to cover up the real mission of the Apollo program (to sell Tang to the Selenites in exchange for Velcro and digital-watch technology).

Typical tinfoil hat wearing, all knowing liberal who knows how "they' set out to decieve us all. Did you actually look at this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9y_AVYMEUs&feature=youtu.be

I hadn't to follow the conspiracy "truths" as you obviously have but the above has me 100% convinced.

Photo-analyst is a real job with real professionals that do it. We have them, the Russians have them. Do you believe for one minute if any of that was true they would not have made us the laughingstock of the world?

To use Rob's vernacular:

Tell us again how 911 was an inside job and how those planes could not have brought down those buildings.
 
Ask Buzz Aldrin if the moon landings were fake. I'm sure he'll be willing to tell you everything.

If we didn't land on the moon then how is it we can bounce a laser of the moon? Lasers don't bounce off dirt or rock.

If we didn't land on the moon, why haven't the Russians ever called us out on it? Don't you think they would be the first ones to call us out?

Why did the Russians abandon their attempts to land on the moon once we finally did?

If we didn't land on the moon, why is it the probes in orbit around our natural satellite have photographed at least two of our landing sites which includes the feet of our landers?

If conspiracy theorists claim we didn't land on the moon because there are no stars in the picture then obviously they don't believe we've sent a probe to the comet because there are no stars in those pictures either.

If conspiracy theorists don't believe we went to the moon, why not send one or two of them to it and have them walk out on the surface without protection.

Morons
 
Back
Top