The Democrats will Retain Control of the Senate

Will the Democrats keep control of the Senate


  • Total voters
    25
Oh, but surely the Koch Brothers are buying the Senate seat for the Republicans.

They will try just as hard as the Soroses will. Congress answers only to money and power and frankly it was not worth answering your question seriously. I don't want you to die, though you could shut up once in a while.
 
RCP has gone up to +8.

Tragic death of one of my guys, Doug Butzier, has probably hurt the Democrats in Iowa.
 
KANSAS has gone back to a tie.

:eek:

It will probably keep on trending towards Roberts. Soros jumping in probably did not help; it made clear he is not the Independent that he was trying to pass himself off as, even in Johnson County.
 
Ah reckon so.


I still think we'll have to wait until late on election night to see what happens.


I still smell tie.
 
I've never dipped my tie in the soup...

:)

I don't wear them much anymore. The boss told me to wear a tie. I wore a bolo...

:D :D :D
 
Ahhh...

badbaby, how cute. You got a definition on when human starts yet?

Those people in the womb are less than human. No?
 
Ahhh...

badbaby, how cute. You got a definition on when human starts yet?

Those people in the womb are less than human. No?

Oh I'll play, AJ. Maybe you'll take my famous "Amicus Abortion Challenge".

There are actually six separate arguments that comprise the "Is Abortion Moral" debate:

  1. Is it alive?
  2. Is it human?
  3. Is it a person?
  4. Is it physically independent?
  5. Does it have human rights?
  6. Is abortion murder?

Let's see if we can find some common ground here.

1. Is it alive? My answer is yes.

2. Is it human? Again, I'll answer yes.

3. Is it a person? No, it's a "potential person", which is both separate and distinct from a "person", inasmuch as an acorn is distinct from an oak tree.

4. Is it physically independent? Absolutely not. A fetus is dependent upon another human being for nutrients and oxygen. It's worth noting that many of the anti-abortion folks raise the false equivalency that because a newborn infant is also dependent upon another for nutrients and oxygen, a fetus should be considered the functional equivalent of a newborn. This shows an inability to distinguish between the concepts of "physical independence" and "social independence". Social independence is where a child depends on society to feed, clothe and nuture him/her. Physical independence, on the other hand, is when something depends on the physical body of another for its continued existence. This seems to be a point you seem unable or unwilling to grasp.

5. Does it have human rights? A qualified yes. A human fetus has rights to the extent that the do not infringe upon the rights of another, in this case the woman carrying the fetus. You cannot have two entities with equal rights occupying one body, because one will automatically have veto power over the other, and by definition this precludes "equal rights".

6. Is abortion murder? No. It's only murder when it's an independent person. Infants, even premature infants, are considered "independent" of their mother and are accorded full human rights.
 
Well, it isn't in my AV folder. I did post the full size image, but I have no such image in AV size, so I think it's a case of a manufactured "truth" so common with you leftists here. I've checked my hard drives, Photobucket account, and have no such image. If I did I would admit it, because I don't give a shit one way or the other.

Liar.
 
Back
Top