The goss about Lit

He's a mod, and he's on here talking about getting people's IP addresses?

I don't think a mod should even bring up the question of looking into users IPs. It sows distrust. There have been issues with it in the past.

I agree.

As you know, Moderators do not have access to IP addresses, email addresses, or any other private user data. They simply have the ability to move posts out of their assigned forum. That's it.
 
Yes, let's fret over the integrity of Lit and its mods in a topic about the integrity of Lit and its mods that started off with yours truly debunking myths about the integrity of Lit and its mods in another forum.

Yawn.

Go find your drama elsewhere.


I imagine that Cade can be recognized as a crank anywhere else online as easily as he has been here, so your debunkery is probably not all that necessary. But hey, thanks.
 
i don't understand why you guys aren't on your knees thanking magnetron for being the magnificent white knight he is in helping STOMP OUT THESE EVIL SLANDEROUS LIES THAT ARE BEING BELIEVED BY EVERYONE!!

from the sounds of it he's apparently also "fixing this place up" (according to somebody he quoted in the OP) - we should both wish him luck and Laurel should buy him a pony.

you are our hero magnetron. without you people might make 1000 more alts and keep complaining about lit and other dumb people might believe it! oh wait, that's going to happen anyway -- but i'm sure you'll stomp it all out eventually! you go girl!
 
I agree.

As you know, Moderators do not have access to IP addresses, email addresses, or any other private user data. They simply have the ability to move posts out of their assigned forum. That's it.


i heard mark zuckerberg was extremely concerned about lit's integrity. after reading all those reports he personally sent magnetron here to investigate and make sure the claims aren't true. are you a racist moderator, laural?
 
This is just a sample of posts from an adult webmaster forum I participate in.

The original topic was started by me about the popularity of erotic story sites.

At some point it morphed into Lit bashing. I've been doing my best to stomp out a lot of the misconceptions about this place. Unfortunately these webmasters believe everything they read in the complaints they find on the Internets lodged by disgruntled ex-posters and trolls from here.

None of the links work for me for some reason. Reading the quotes, I something from last year. Someone had posted a link to some site which had someone complaining about the same group of mods. I remember it because amongst the comments was a poster named Obama (or POTUS or some such) where the guy was complaining about the poster busybody from Lit and how busybody has been harassing him. And then busybody (don't know if it was the same guy from here though) was talking crap to him. It was pretty hilarious (it tickled my funnybone, anyhow).
 
I agree.

As you know, Moderators do not have access to IP addresses, email addresses, or any other private user data. They simply have the ability to move posts out of their assigned forum. That's it.

You can register an account at this webmaster forum and read it for yourself. Or you can log into my account. Just PM me a request and I'll send you the URL and my password.

What I do know for certain is that there is a handful of "webmasters" there that are severely ill informed about or biased against Lit and I probably wasted a good 20 minutes of my life explaining to not just them but everyone that any social site of this magnitude is going to have an above average amount of unsubstantiated and substantiated complaints. And that most of the complaints from here were likely disgruntled ex-posters for silly reasons and trolls.
 
Gee, rival websites and ex lit members are saying bad stuff. Outside of Cade, the members most likely posted stories that got bad reviews or their stories were rejected.

Color me shocked.

But then again, maybe its all Manu and Laurel trying pushing all the people who say "What is Lit" over here.

I am going with the laurelspiracy.
 
You can register an account at this webmaster forum and read it for yourself. Or you can log into my account. Just PM me a request and I'll send you the URL and my password.

What I do know for certain is that there is a handful of "webmasters" there that are severely ill informed about or biased against Lit and I probably wasted a good 20 minutes of my life explaining to not just them but everyone that any social site of this magnitude is going to have an above average amount of unsubstantiated and substantiated complaints. And that most of the complaints from here were likely disgruntled ex-posters for silly reasons and trolls.

no shit? no one cares.
 
I agree.

As you know, Moderators do not have access to IP addresses, email addresses, or any other private user data. They simply have the ability to move posts out of their assigned forum. That's it.

I know it, but I'm glad you said so, because not everyone does.
 
But if we didn't know we were in mortal danger, how would we recognize Magnetron as our savior?

you know what i like best about that post? i like how it has almost no relation to the post he quoted.

also, i need more caffeine or pretty soon i'm just going to be posting random strings of words and curses. it's too early for me to be a dick.
 
I see Laurel edited my post last post and removed her words that I quoted.

So much for the integrity of Lit and its mods.

Consider me done with this thread.
 
you know what i like best about that post? i like how it has almost no relation to the post he quoted.

also, i need more caffeine or pretty soon i'm just going to be posting random strings of words and curses. it's too early for me to be a dick.

Laurel pulled a bait and switch on him. Her post originally had more content, which she seems to have removed.
 
Laurel pulled a bait and switch on him. Her post originally had more content, which she seems to have removed.

ahh, she does do that at times, doesn't she?

i think i'm gonna jerk off. it's very gloomy and blah today. feel free to join me.

all of you.

in spirit, of course.

anyone who comes to my house to wank with me is getting cut.
 
I see Laurel edited my post last post and removed her words that I quoted.

So much for the integrity of Lit and its mods.

There is a lot of backstory that you had no reason to know about before starting this thread but that has been shared with you in this thread.

Part of the story is that Cade flooded the board with racist crap, got called out on it, took offense with certain posters, created a host of alts to flood the board with more racist crap and to troll certain posters, got squished by Laurel when enough was enough, and started posting the same racist and trolling crap on the forums you discovered.

Another part of the story is that some mods on this site, years ago, abused their powers and the posters' trust, causing unrest and resulting in the mods' powers being curtailed.

Rather than picking up on the history being shared with you and recognizing a) no one gives a shit about Cade's defamatory posts on other sites and b) your blather about ISPs will contribute to a lot tinfoil hatters screaming, "The sky is falling!", you lash out.

Smooth move, that is.
 
Last edited:
I see Laurel edited my post last post and removed her words that I quoted.

So much for the integrity of Lit and its mods.

Consider me done with this thread.

There is a lot of backstory that you had no reason to know about before starting this thread but that has been shared with you in this thread.

I removed a portion of my original response because I realized, like cjh said, that you probably didn't know the backstory. To me, it seemed very obvious that the "complaints" on that site were trolling. It never occurred to me that anyone would take those seriously, as they literally make no sense.

The only other person to post a link to that site on this forum was Cade, a troll who (under numerous aliases) also made repeated references to being able to ferret out users' IP addresses.

Cade was also a self-professed adult webmaster.

These sent up red flags for me, prompting my response. But after reading cjh's post, it occurred to me that I could be overreacting - that these coincidences could be just that: innocent coincidences. So I took it back.

I'm sorry for the tone of my original post, and for the confusion my edit caused.
 
Back
Top