Plot Bunny ripped from the headlines!

JKendallDane

Plot Bunny Herder
Joined
Jun 26, 2012
Posts
6,897
Want to do a "hot for teacher" story but don't want to stick to the old, tired and typical cliche plot? Maybe this news report can help spice it up for you:

http://fox17online.com/2014/10/02/t...of-having-threesome-with-16-year-old-student/

Rumor has it that the two teachers intend to plead insanity. Considering that they thought a sixteen-year-old male would keep his mouth shut after being a a threeway, they just might get off.
 
This is the part I like: "Shelley S. Dufresne, 2, and Rachel Respess, 24, are facing charges of carnal knowledge of a juvenile, contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile and indecent behavior with a juvenile." Imagine -- they have 2-year-old teachers in Loozyanna. Hot ones, too!
 
Want to do a "hot for teacher" story but don't want to stick to the old, tired and typical cliche plot? Maybe this news report can help spice it up for you:

http://fox17online.com/2014/10/02/t...of-having-threesome-with-16-year-old-student/

Rumor has it that the two teachers intend to plead insanity. Considering that they thought a sixteen-year-old male would keep his mouth shut after being a a threeway, they just might get off.

The truth is more disgusting than fiction. I mean, even 16 year old girls think 16 year old boys are gross. 16 year old boys fart out loud in class and scratch their balls under the desk because they think the teacher can't see them.

These two teachers may be insane for being attracted to that kind of grossness, but seriously, they are pedophiles. It's not that 16 year olds are appealing or that teachers think it's ok to date their kids. There is something wrong with these women. That's in addition to being stupid for thinking the boy wouldn't tell.
 
Is it that hard to find an 18+ year old male in Kenner, Louisiana, who wants to be in a threesome? Do they...not have Craigslist?
 
I loved this:
Shelley S. Dufresne, 2, and Rachel Respess, 24, are facing charges of carnal knowledge of a juvenile, contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile and indecent behavior with a juvenile.

"Carnal knowledge of a juvenile." What a wonderful expression; clean out of the stone age.
I notice that "irresponsible (or unprofessional) conduct" is not listed. I wonder why?
 
The truth is more disgusting than fiction. I mean, even 16 year old girls think 16 year old boys are gross. 16 year old boys fart out loud in class and scratch their balls under the desk because they think the teacher can't see them.

These two teachers may be insane for being attracted to that kind of grossness, but seriously, they are pedophiles. It's not that 16 year olds are appealing or that teachers think it's ok to date their kids. There is something wrong with these women. That's in addition to being stupid for thinking the boy wouldn't tell.


16 is also age of consent so this is unethical and pure stupidity for their jobs sake, but its not rape and its not insanity.

When the teacher is a guy and its a sixteen year old sex pot the consensus is who can blame him? She must have led him on.
 
16 is also age of consent so this is unethical and pure stupidity for their jobs sake, but its not rape and its not insanity.

When the teacher is a guy and its a sixteen year old sex pot the consensus is who can blame him? She must have led him on.

I really hate that mindset :-( I don't care if the student DOES try to initiate things; if you're a teacher you're supposed to be an adult with the maturity to say no.
 
16 is also age of consent so this is unethical and pure stupidity for their jobs sake, but its not rape and its not insanity.

When the teacher is a guy and its a sixteen year old sex pot the consensus is who can blame him? She must have led him on.

17 is the age of consent in La.
 
Want to do a "hot for teacher" story but don't want to stick to the old, tired and typical cliche plot? Maybe this news report can help spice it up for you:

http://fox17online.com/2014/10/02/t...of-having-threesome-with-16-year-old-student/

Rumor has it that the two teachers intend to plead insanity. Considering that they thought a sixteen-year-old male would keep his mouth shut after being a a threeway, they just might get off.

Since a person under 18 is involved, this would not be allowed. If you listed the boy's age as 18, it would be acceptable, but much of the salaciousness would be missing.
 
These two teachers may be insane for being attracted to that kind of grossness, but seriously, they are pedophiles.

You know I love ya, pl, but please don't sling around the "pedophile" tag so easily. Legally it normally only applies when the victim is 11 or younger, or up to 13 in some states if the offender is five or more years older.

It certainly doesn't apply in this case, especially since the incident happened just three weeks ago and the "victim" has since turned seventeen, which is the age of consent in Louisiana.
 
No matter what the age, teachers are in a position of authority. It's wrong, even if he wasn't in their classes.
 
I'm not saying it wasn't wrong...just that the term pedophile doesn't apply.
 
You know I love ya, pl, but please don't sling around the "pedophile" tag so easily. Legally it normally only applies when the victim is 11 or younger, or up to 13 in some states if the offender is five or more years older.

It certainly doesn't apply in this case, especially since the incident happened just three weeks ago and the "victim" has since turned seventeen, which is the age of consent in Louisiana.

Ok. I'll take back the label, but it's not normal for teachers to have sexual feelings towards students. It's similar to the incest squick factor for most of us. Not just because it's illegal, or because we'Re in a position of authority. It's squicky.
 
The truth is more disgusting than fiction. I mean, even 16 year old girls think 16 year old boys are gross. 16 year old boys fart out loud in class and scratch their balls under the desk because they think the teacher can't see them.

These two teachers may be insane for being attracted to that kind of grossness, but seriously, they are pedophiles. It's not that 16 year olds are appealing or that teachers think it's ok to date their kids. There is something wrong with these women. That's in addition to being stupid for thinking the boy wouldn't tell.
That made me laugh, pl.

Those two women really are nuts. Why would they risk everything like that?

As Freya noted, could they really not find someone of age that isn't a student in their school? Come on. They could have found a hundred eighteen year old guys that would have lined up for the chance.
 
*sigh*


Forgive me, I am conflicted about this.

Intellectually, even morally, I think those two ladies are insane for seducing the '2-3 weeks to go until legal' football player. Just wait 3 weeks and have all the sex you want without criminal charges. Perhaps lose your job if found out, but not JAIL time.

The following is going to get juvenile. My apologies.

As a man: WHAT THE **** MAN!? You have TWO women who are willing to give you threesomes and you go and SQUEAL about it!? Can you be ANY more of a douche? Do you know the incredible education you were going to get from this experience? You had to screw it up like an arse! Son of a gun!

That goes to show ladies. Find real men to have great sex with, not stupid teenagers. They don't know a good thing when it orgasms on their face.

Juvenile Rant Over
-----------------------

I am probably not the correct individual to provide opinions on this matter. I zestfully enjoy women in command, forcing their lustful wishes on me. I am an unrepentant deviant on this matter.

I hope things work out for the best for all parties involved.

Montanos
 
Last edited:
I loved this:
Shelley S. Dufresne, 2, and Rachel Respess, 24, are facing charges of carnal knowledge of a juvenile, contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile and indecent behavior with a juvenile.

"Carnal knowledge of a juvenile." What a wonderful expression; clean out of the stone age.
I notice that "irresponsible (or unprofessional) conduct" is not listed. I wonder why?

It is Louisiana after all.

No matter what the age, teachers are in a position of authority. It's wrong, even if he wasn't in their classes.

I don't know about Louisiana, but in this state, there's special rules for teachers and others in like positions, it's not just wrong but criminal. I imagine it's like that in other states.

But as others have said, really stupid thinking that a 16 YO wouldn't brag.
 
This says something about professional standards in Louisiana, eh?


Seems like you are making the assumption the newspapers are reporting everything wholly and accurately. Considering many of your other posts you seem to be stepping out of character.

IMNSHO, the vast majority of newspapers are far more interested in being as salacious as possible to attract readers and making money than in "Fair and accurate reporting." My comments are way less of a defense of the state of LA then a condemnation of the majority or U.S. news reporting in general.
 
I don't know about Louisiana, but in this state, there's special rules for teachers and others in like positions, it's not just wrong but criminal. I imagine it's like that in other states.

I think that is what the "indecent behavior with a juvenile and carnal knowledge of a juvenile" charges are all about. That seems to be the typical misdemeanor charges they use in Louisiana with someone the age of the "victim." (remember he was only a couple of weeks from turning 17)

Although...even if he had already been 17 and able to legally consent, Louisiana has an interesting law they added to the books back in 2007:

According to Louisiana Revised Statute 14:81.4, inappropriate conduct between a teacher and a student is defined as a school employee having sex with a student who is between 17 and 21.

Interesting that they chose to draw the line at 21.
 
Seems like you are making the assumption the newspapers are reporting everything wholly and accurately. Considering many of your other posts you seem to be stepping out of character.

IMNSHO, the vast majority of newspapers are far more interested in being as salacious as possible to attract readers and making money than in "Fair and accurate reporting." My comments are way less of a defense of the state of LA then a condemnation of the majority or U.S. news reporting in general.

It's even worse than a newspaper. *shudder* It's Fox news. :eek:
 
A warning to lady teachers.
Next time you fancy a romp in the hay with a pupil,
[a] Make sure of the age range
Find a method of keeping him quiet.
(the daft ba$tard couldn't keep shtumm:- Prior to these arrests allegations had surfaced of a student involved with two teachers. Allegedly the student had bragged about having sex with two teachers. )

I presume that the School Board/ Governors will have a quiet word with those two stupids at some convenient time ?
 
Back
Top