Men's rights activists now defending pedophilia

[LJ_Reloaded]

Oh wait, nope, it's a feminist defending pedophilia... everyone to arms to defend her!

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/nov/29/barbara-ellen-madeleine-martin-comment

Looking at the case of Madeleine Martin, the 39-year-old RE teacher and mother of two, jailed for 32 months and placed on the sex offenders' register for sleeping with a 15-year-old male pupil, do we seriously think that a female teacher sleeping with a male pupil is on a par with a male teacher sleeping with a girl pupil? I don't. And neither, I'd wager, would most 15-year-old boys.

Boys can't be raped because they always want sex.

But they champion equality!!!

 

[KUJACK]

Oh wait, nope, it's a feminist defending pedophilia... everyone to arms to defend her!

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/nov/29/barbara-ellen-madeleine-martin-comment

Boys can't be raped because they always want sex.

But they champion equality!!!

White males are always guilty of discrimination of women and people of color. Period. Just get used to it.

 

[Skiddles2014]

Yeah, an article from 5 years ago.

Way to stay on top of things, loser.

 

[badbabysitter]

oh, I thought you were talking about men's rights guru Warren Farrel who does support pedophilia... well, incest at the very least

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

oh, I thought you were talking about men's rights guru Warren Farrel who does support pedophilia... well, incest at the very least

It's only bad when men do it. When women do it you find it A-OK!

I noticed you had no criticism for the feminist I mentioned in the OP. Probably because you ARE a pedophile who preys on boys who are too young to know what a blood sucking harpy you are.

 

[badbabysitter]

It's only bad when men do it. When women do it you find it A-OK!

I noticed you had no criticism for the feminist I mentioned in the OP. Probably because you ARE a pedophile who preys on boys who are too young to know what a blood sucking harpy you are.

so.. you create a thread title about a men's rights advocate defending pedophilia

and now you're upset that someone brought up a men's rights activist that defends pedophilia?

and you're right, I'm not crticizing the woman in question.. because the the thread title was a fraudulent bait and switch ( of which you're famous for)... so why should I justify your intellectual dishonesty in the first place?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

so.. you create a thread title about a men's rights advocate defending pedophilia

And showing a feminist who's defending pedophilia in the article.

and now you're upset that someone brought up a men's rights activist that defends pedophilia?

I am? I didn't even see you show a men's rights activist that defends pedophilia.

What I pointed out is that you always defend women pedophiles. Same pedo defense, different set of excuses.

 

[badbabysitter]

And showing a feminist who's defending pedophilia in the article.

so.. you're admitting you created a bait and switch... that I baited and switched...oh right, only you can do that

I am? I didn't even see you show a men's rights activist that defends pedophilia.

I showed you Warren Farell


here, let me repeat myself since you ignored in the other posts

WARREN FARRELL IS A MEN'S RIGHTS ACTIVIST THAT DEFENDS PEDOPHILIA

What I pointed out is that you always defend women pedophiles. Same pedo defense, different set of excuses.

i did no such thing, i challenge you to show me once where I have ever done so.... i just thought in this case you might actually be discussing Warren Farrell who is a men's rights activist that defends pedophilia

or maybe Janet Bloomfield, also a men's rights activist who also defends pedophilia

or Tom Martin, a men's rights activist who has accused children of targeting pedophiles


you know, i thought you actually might be discussing something you put in your thread title.. crazy me

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

so.. you're admitting you created a bait and switch... that I baited and switched...oh right, only you can do that




I showed you Warren Farell


here, let me repeat myself since you ignored in the other posts

WARREN FARRELL IS A MEN'S RIGHTS ACTIVIST THAT DEFENDS PEDOPHILIA




i did no such thing, i challenge you to show me once where I have ever done so.... i just thought in this case you might actually be discussing Warren Farrell who is a men's rights activist that defends pedophilia

or maybe Janet Bloomfield, also a men's rights activist who also defends pedophilia

or Tom Martin, a men's rights activist who has accused children of targeting pedophiles


you know, i thought you actually might be discussing something you put in your thread title.. crazy me

Again, you haven't SHOWN anything. You've asserted.

And again, you always defend women pedophiles. Same pedo defense, different set of excuses.

So even if you do show that these MRAs are pedophiles you yourself defend women pedophiles so what makes you any better?

Because I'm 100% right and you're 100% wrong, I'm just going to keep repeating this until you issue your first condemnation of a woman pedophile.

So please keep it up. I much prefer to beat that fucking condemnation out of you with relentless shaming tactics than for you to capitulate this early.

 

[badbabysitter]

Warren Farrel

“When I get my most glowing positive cases, 6 out of 200,” says Farrell, “the incest is part of the family’s open, sensual style of life, wherein sex is an outgrowth of warmth and affection. It is more likely that the father has good sex with his wife, and his wife is likely to know and approve — and in one or two cases to join in.”

Bloomfield on Saville

asically, the girls were groupies. They wanted all the benefits of hanging out with a big star and they understood it came with a price and they paid it, perhaps reluctantly, but with full knowledge that the trips to London and the fags and the sweet weren’t free. …

And now they are claiming the MEN abused THEM? Looks to me like it was the other way around.

of course omitting that he had victims as young as eight and nine, and many of his victims were in hospitals to begin with

Tom Martin

Pedophiles should be removed from society and given compassionate treatment for their illness.

Child prostitutes should be put back in school, or if repeat offenders, prosecuted for attempting to profit by preying on the mentally ill pedo population.

Pedos have an incentive not to re-offend – to keep their liberty, and avoid a secure treatment unit.

Child prostitutes should face a choice between their freedom (apart from when at school), or, if they continue avoiding school to go whoring, then incarceration and school.

children should be sent to jail.. the ones that prey in them should be given compassion

please keep repeating your bait and switch.... I'll just post about what your thread title is about

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Again, you haven't SHOWN anything. You've asserted.

And again, you always defend women pedophiles. Same pedo defense, different set of excuses.

So even if you do show that these MRAs are pedophiles you yourself defend women pedophiles so what makes you any better?

Because I'm 100% right and you're 100% wrong, I'm just going to keep repeating this until you issue your first condemnation of a woman pedophile.

So please keep it up. I much prefer to beat that fucking condemnation out of you with relentless shaming tactics than for you to capitulate this early.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

http://wgno.com/2014/10/03/outside-judges-might-be-needed-for-destrehan-teacher-sex-case/

Defense attorney Stephen Rue believes Dufresne can have a fair trial in St. Charles Parish even though most have probably heard about the allegations. He says that these teachers are women will help the two down the line if the case does in fact go to trial.

When asked if Rue, as a criminal defense attorney, preferred his clients to be two female teachers or two male teachers, he answered, “1,000% female.” When asked why Rue says, “There’s a double standard in life. They’re going to be looked at in a different way. I think that men in general, and also by race frankly are looked at differently than white females.”

A defense attorney defends double standards that favor white females...

 

[badbabysitter]

Again, you haven't SHOWN anything. You've asserted.

Direct quotes are not assertations...did you even read them

what am I saying , of course you didnt.. it doesnt fit your narrative.. so you ignored it

And again, you always defend women pedophiles. Same pedo defense, different set of excuses.

Did no such thing... I was responding to the thread title.. you want to talk about female pedophiles, make a thread about them... if you want honest debate.. dont start with dishonesty

So even if you do show that these MRAs are pedophiles you yourself defend women pedophiles so what makes you any better?

No.. it doesn'tand i never said that they were pedophiiles, but that they defended them..

funny.. you just literally made the argument here that i made about gamergate... yet now, it's magically valid... funny that

Because I'm 100% right and you're 100% wrong, I'm just going to keep repeating this until you issue your first condemnation of a woman pedophile.

how are you right? you made a thread about men's rights activists defending pedophila.. I agreed and showed you some

the only way I'd be wrong is that if you didnt make the thread title; Men's rights activists now defending pedophilia

So please keep it up. I much prefer to beat that fucking condemnation out of you with relentless shaming tactics than for you to capitulate this early.

how are you beating anything out of me.. or shaming me.. you're just showing that you dont understand english composition.. if you arent going to discuss what the thread is named after, you're being dishonest.. you can't use shaming tactics based on dishonesty..it simply doesnt work.. it defies basic logic

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Defending a female pedophiles? Check.

Unsubstantiated assertions? Check.

Whining? Check.

Keep on going, pedo defender!