funluvinaj
Simply AJ
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2008
- Posts
- 26,772
They exist.
I don't have to write him a user manual.
I can't manipulate him.
I can't refuse him.
Bingo.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They exist.
I don't have to write him a user manual.
I can't manipulate him.
I can't refuse him.
They certainly exist, though many, here and elsewhere, do indeed deny their existence or even mock the very idea. The 'twue Dom' insult tends to be trotted out, as if classical Dominant traits are some hopeless pipe dream or, worse, to be actively avoided because they are sexist or similar.
They certainly exist, though many, here and elsewhere, do indeed deny their existence or even mock the very idea. The 'twue Dom' insult tends to be trotted out, as if classical Dominant traits are some hopeless pipe dream or, worse, to be actively avoided because they are sexist or similar.
then you did a horrible job
Can't say I know anything about that except the title of the book.
I find this very interesting as it is along the lines of a discussion I began to have with my guy. He has the dominant personality yet I've never felt more respected and appreciated. I think knowing that this man would not tolerate certain negative attributes I've had with weaker men is refreshing. Thinking on that even more I don't think it would even come to that.
Though I don't find myself scary or intimidating I've been told I can be... and the men in my life up til this point simply cave when I'm passionate about something. This guy embraces that he has his own opinion and knows he's right. Lol. When he's wrong he freely admits it. It's so refreshing to be able to walk along beside someone or even follow and not be expected to lead.
Maybe my wanting a man to lead, to open doors for me, to take care of me goes against the feminist ideal but I don't think I'm alone.
Maybe my wanting a man to lead, to open doors for me, to take care of me goes against the feminist ideal but I don't think I'm alone.
I see the feminist ideal as having the right to choose how I live my life, without being judged or discriminated against for my choices on the basis of my gender. It just so happens that a 24/7 D/s relationship makes me happier than any other kind. My life, my choice.
I think the classic misconception is that a Dom/me is "strong" and a sub is "tender(weak)." A more accurate--and healthier--description would be of two people who are each strong and tender in complementary ways.
I think the classic misconception is that a Dom/me is "strong" and a sub is "tender(weak)." A more accurate--and healthier--description would be of two people who are each strong and tender in complementary ways.
I'm realizing that with the right man I'm completely submissive. Didn't think I had it in me honestly.
I see the feminist ideal as having the right to choose how I live my life, without being judged or discriminated against for my choices on the basis of my gender. It just so happens that a 24/7 D/s relationship makes me happier than any other kind. My life, my choice.
I think the classic misconception is that a Dom/me is "strong" and a sub is "tender(weak)." A more accurate--and healthier--description would be of two people who are each strong and tender in complementary ways.
I don't mean this as a slight against you, but I would have to disagree. I think any hardcore feminist would probably harbor a strong dislike for your Dominant, and maybe a touch of contempt for you, simply because you choose to lay yourself bare for that man.I see the feminist ideal as having the right to choose how I live my life, without being judged or discriminated against for my choices on the basis of my gender. It just so happens that a 24/7 D/s relationship makes me happier than any other kind. My life, my choice.
It's knowing that someone precious and desirable, with the potential to operate and exist completely independent of me, chooses to put that in my hands of her own free will that I find so fascinating. And rewarding.
nodsnodsI think that is part of what is rewarding for both people.
I don't mean this as a slight against you, but I would have to disagree. I think any hardcore feminist would probably harbor a strong dislike for your Dominant, and maybe a touch of contempt for you, simply because you choose to lay yourself bare for that man.
Personally, I agree with you, on both counts, though I'm not female. A D/s relationship makes me happy as well, and it's my life, so I could care less what other people think about my lifestyle.
Oh! There were three items in your post. I was disagreeing with the feminist ideal, at least as how it's put forth to the public for consumption. Don't recall ever seeing a feminist talk about finding freedom in any clime, much less that of a man. But I'm probably wrong, as I'm not the most well-read individual on that particular topic. If I had to hazard a guess, I'd say you're more of a feminist than most self-proclaimed feminists, because it seems you do cling strongly to your femininity, without holding such a narrow viewpoint.I'm not sure what you're disagreeing with. I think it's fairly obvious that not all feminists define the "feminist ideal" in the same way that I do and I see no reason why they should. My lifestyle choice does not make me any less a feminist and I would doubt the motivation, not to mention the sanity, of any hardcore feminist that attempted to argue that I was undermining "the cause." As for their contempt... it's meaningless to me.![]()
Don't want to hijack or step on toes as I'm reading this thread and learning.
Does a woman really want to surrender herself in this way long term? Is it a role play thing that you want to switch on and off or permanent?
For me men and women are equals in every aspect of being. Wouldn't the women want to be the dom at times? I guess I'm not getting the whole part about him always in control.
This is a long-winded way of finding out, Honey. You could have simply read my bio.