Russian strategic bombers reportedly practice nuclear missile strike against US

Busybody

We are ALL BUSYBODY!
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Posts
55,323
Russian strategic bombers reportedly practice nuclear missile strike against US



A pair of Russian bomber jets reportedly practiced cruise missile attacks against targets in the United States last week, according to a report published on Monday in the Washington Free Beacon.



Bill Gertz, a writer for the Beacon, reported that two Russian Tu-95 Bear bombers were tracked flying over the Labrador Sea last week in the northern Atlantic Ocean near Iceland, Greenland and Canada as part of a recent training mission.

“Analysis of the flight indicated the aircraft were conducting practice runs to a pre-determined ‘launch box’ — an optimum point for firing nuclear-armed cruise missiles at US targets,” Gertz wrote, citing unnamed defense officials he described as being familiar with intelligence reports.

The aircraft, Gertz added, are outfitted with six AS-15 nuclear-armed cruise missiles, each capable of striking targets as far away as 1,800 miles.

Representatives for the US Northern Command and Northern American Aerospace Defense Command, or NORAD, declined to comment to Gertz ahead of his report, and told RT in an email Monday afternoon that they could not confirm the allegations printed by the Free Beacon. On his part, however, Gertz wrote that neither the US nor Canada responded to the alleged incident because it reportedly occurred outside of the North American Air Defense Identification Zone.

According to Gertz, the reported drill occurred last week at the same time that officials from the US, Canada and other allied partners met in Wales for the largest NATO summit of its kind in two years, where on the agenda, among other topics, was the escalating crisis in eastern Ukraine and potential action that could be undertaken to counter perceived Russian aggression. On the heels of that meeting, both the US and the European Union are expected to impose new sanctions against Moscow.

The latest report comes days after Russia’s own recent decision to revise a 2010 military doctrine to identify the US and NATO members as enemies, which “clearly outline the conditions of a preemptive nuclear strike” against partner countries, Gertz wrote. With regards to the alliance, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said during last week’s summit that at least 4,000 troops from various member states will soon form a “spearhead” regiment that will be “ready to deploy within a few days with air, sea and Special Forces support” in the event that the Ukrainian crisis spread into allied territory.

Gertz has previously reported for the Beacon that no fewer than 16 Russian bombers incurred the airspace of either US or Canada during the month of August, and this week’s article comes days after similar allegations were made abroad: late last month, a Dutch F-16 military jet intercepted and escorted a Russian Tu-95 bomber out of that nation’s airspace, as did the Japanese Air Self-Defense Force during a similar incident.

“Clearly, we at the US Strategic Command do monitor the strategic environment,”Admiral Cecil Haney, commander of the US Strategic Command, told Gertz last month following reports that Russian bombers came within 50 miles of California on the US West Coast. “I will say that the business of them coming close to the United States of America, we take very seriously.”
 
STFU, BUNNY, what about BIRTH CONTROL and ABORTION and FERGUSON and R RICE?

Huh? WHAT ABOUT THAT?????????????:mad:
 
:rolleyes:

B 52z are twice the age of the FAGZ flying it

your point is???????????
 
an optimum point for firing nuclear-armed cruise missiles at US targets,” Gertz wrote, citing unnamed defense officials he described as being familiar with intelligence reports.


could be mounted on JACK ASSES would be deadly

:rolleyes:
 
Russian strategic bombers reportedly practice nuclear missile strike against US



A pair of Russian bomber jets reportedly practiced cruise missile attacks against targets in the United States last week, according to a report published on Monday in the Washington Free Beacon.



Bill Gertz, a writer for the Beacon, reported that two Russian Tu-95 Bear bombers were tracked flying over the Labrador Sea last week in the northern Atlantic Ocean near Iceland, Greenland and Canada as part of a recent training mission.

“Analysis of the flight indicated the aircraft were conducting practice runs to a pre-determined ‘launch box’ — an optimum point for firing nuclear-armed cruise missiles at US targets,” Gertz wrote, citing unnamed defense officials he described as being familiar with intelligence reports.

The aircraft, Gertz added, are outfitted with six AS-15 nuclear-armed cruise missiles, each capable of striking targets as far away as 1,800 miles.

Representatives for the US Northern Command and Northern American Aerospace Defense Command, or NORAD, declined to comment to Gertz ahead of his report, and told RT in an email Monday afternoon that they could not confirm the allegations printed by the Free Beacon. On his part, however, Gertz wrote that neither the US nor Canada responded to the alleged incident because it reportedly occurred outside of the North American Air Defense Identification Zone.

According to Gertz, the reported drill occurred last week at the same time that officials from the US, Canada and other allied partners met in Wales for the largest NATO summit of its kind in two years, where on the agenda, among other topics, was the escalating crisis in eastern Ukraine and potential action that could be undertaken to counter perceived Russian aggression. On the heels of that meeting, both the US and the European Union are expected to impose new sanctions against Moscow.

The latest report comes days after Russia’s own recent decision to revise a 2010 military doctrine to identify the US and NATO members as enemies, which “clearly outline the conditions of a preemptive nuclear strike” against partner countries, Gertz wrote. With regards to the alliance, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said during last week’s summit that at least 4,000 troops from various member states will soon form a “spearhead” regiment that will be “ready to deploy within a few days with air, sea and Special Forces support” in the event that the Ukrainian crisis spread into allied territory.

Gertz has previously reported for the Beacon that no fewer than 16 Russian bombers incurred the airspace of either US or Canada during the month of August, and this week’s article comes days after similar allegations were made abroad: late last month, a Dutch F-16 military jet intercepted and escorted a Russian Tu-95 bomber out of that nation’s airspace, as did the Japanese Air Self-Defense Force during a similar incident.

“Clearly, we at the US Strategic Command do monitor the strategic environment,”Admiral Cecil Haney, commander of the US Strategic Command, told Gertz last month following reports that Russian bombers came within 50 miles of California on the US West Coast. “I will say that the business of them coming close to the United States of America, we take very seriously.”


What The Fuck!! I'm sure our forces don't do that to Russia!!!!:rolleyes:
 
:rolleyes:

B 52z are twice the age of the FAGZ flying it

your point is???????????

And almost ALL of them have been sent to the bone yard in favor of newer better bombers. We keep a hand full around because old fucking retards like you haven't realized we don't need that shit anymore, because it's dumb. And as soon as you twats die off we're going to scrap B52's in favor of RC bombers too.
 
And almost ALL of them have been sent to the bone yard in favor of newer better bombers. We keep a hand full around because old fucking retards like you haven't realized we don't need that shit anymore, because it's dumb. And as soon as you twats die off we're going to scrap B52's in favor of RC bombers too.

:rolleyes:
 

You think I'm joking....in 30 years the only real people left on the battlefield will be grunts, and even then they will be looking to manufacture those too. We have the technology.

But then again that wouldn't give you RWinger WHARRR mongers quite the hard on if you weren't sending kids off to die now would it?
 
So if Putin is testing Obama, why are you the ones scared poopless?
 
Iggy the dipshit.

Oh look I notice the coward has nothing to counter reality....except time warp bullshit stories from the fucking 60's that have zero relevance today. Unless you can tell us why we should be scared of Russia?

Man up bitch and name the gym/ring you want your ass kicked in old man.... fucking cowardly piece of shit running his daygo fuck socket too much. Not that I expect you too, iggy bunker fuckin' pussy.
 
Last edited:
Current top stories on Google News:

Apple 6 unveiled
Kyle Flood comments on Ray Rice
Holly Bobo search
MH17 investigation
Sons of Anarchy season premiere
Obama seeking funding for IS offensive
British royal grandparents delighted
Scottish independence update
Australian shark victim
New Iraq admins
Trump casinos bankrupt
Enterovirus in midwest
Lights dim on Broadway for Joan Rivers
 
But then again that wouldn't give you RWinger WHARRR mongers quite the hard on if you weren't sending kids off to die now would it?

don't be silly

we will round up the youngsters and just KILL EM HERE....no need to send em THERE...save $:kiss:
 
don't be silly

we will round up the youngsters and just KILL EM HERE....no need to send em THERE...save $:kiss:

You don't want to save money......your financial interest lie in sending them off to a pointless war.

Which brings us back to for all you and vettey's bluster about war, neither of you high speed thinkers can come up with a reason why we NEED to persist in a war in Iraq.....can't name a single fucking perk the tax payer gets out of it, not one. The ONLY people who benefit are the military/defense contractors...that's it and wouldn't you know they are by far and large mega right wingers. All cheering for war without reason or cause.....except they want their contracts back. But they won't admit it nosir!! Just scream "But Islam!! And real patriots love WARRRR!!!" and ignore the questions.

Why is it necessary?

What do we get out of it?

If your answers are "NO" and "GOP welfare contracts" then you're a scum bag for supporting war for those reasons.
 
Last edited:
You don't want to save money......your financial interest lie in sending them off to a pointless war.

Which brings us back to for all you and vettey's bluster about war, neither of you high speed thinkers can come up with a reason why we NEED to persist in a war in Iraq.....can't name a single fucking perk the tax payer gets out of it, not one. The ONLY people who benefit are the military/defense contractors...that's it and wouldn't you know they are by far and large mega right wingers. All cheering for war without reason or cause.....except they want their contracts back. But they won't admit it nosir!! Just scream "But Islam!! And real patriots love WARRRR!!!" and ignore the questions.

Why is it necessary?

What do we get out of it?

If your answers are "NO" and "GOP welfare contracts" then you're a scum bag for supporting war for those reasons.

Busy body and vette are real patriots that retreat across the street when they see a brown person.
 
Russian strategic bombers reportedly practice nuclear missile strike against US

You call this news? They have been doing this for 50 years.

Along with training and a bit of political humiliation, electronic warfare tech is being tested. You send an aircraft loaded with electronic gear close to enemy airspace. He turns on all his SAM radars and you get to see where they are and how capable the system is.

You don't think US strategic bombers don't routinely fly around Russian airspace and call it training?

Either side conduct naval exercises and they are ringed with AWACs, subs and electronic intel gathering flights.

Russia has more main battle tanks then the rest of the world put together. They are totally geared for a land war. Nuclear capable bombers are a sideshow to tie up SAMs and interceptors by requiring US defence. Atlantic fleet attempts to cut line with Europe. Pacific fleet keeps the Chinese quiet. More tanks than you got anti-tank weapons come rolling out of Russia.

The US and it's allies would use nukes first in a tactical situation. Russia would have to undergo a nationalistic coup to use strategic weapons. And does not require tactical nukes to win an attack. In defence the vast spaces of Russia will eat up entire countries commitments of soldiers. Russia might go tactical nuke if invaded.

Nukes have a use in tactical warfare. Close off a pass, catch a naval fleet, destroy an air corridor transport fleet. They are not limited to the destruction of cities and populations. Russia does not need to use nukes. It would actually be counter productive.
 
Back
Top