Officer Wilson Has Injuries

It's relevant primarily to the likes of BB and James.

It was irrelevant to the officer's decision to shoot the man six times.

Gasoline on fire.

Strong proof that the man hurt the officer, though, could have been a game changer.

Get the fucking name right, Its BUNNY fucking SLIPPERS...BS!!!!!!!!!!!!:rolleyes:

The DRUG INFUSED HULKING THUG wasn't going down and represented a DANGER to the COMMUNITY as well as the STALWART COP protecting the COMMUNITY


That's why he was shot 6 times

I know! You would have wanted he be pelted with ROSE PETALS
 
Uh, point taken, but there are not a lot of other "races" out there burning down the house...

Then you didn't take my point.

No RACE "burned down the house". Individuals did. It would not take much effort to find people of the same race who disagree with those actions.

I believe I saw a video where some black people lined up in front of the liquor store to stop looters from going into it. So why yell about the black looters without giving credit to the good citizens who were black?
 
The innocent UTE attacked the officer.
That's just what you believe.

Johnson admitted that.
Johnson said just the opposite.

Then the gentle giant came back and with his one good remaining eye, the officer attempted to prevent his own demise.
You don't know that. There's been no statement (that I've seen) from Wilson saying that's what happened and the only information saying it (that's been made public) is hearsay.
 
Then you didn't take my point.

No RACE "burned down the house". Individuals did. It would not take much effort to find people of the same race who disagree with those actions.

I believe I saw a video where some black people lined up in front of the liquor store to stop looters from going into it. So why yell about the black looters without giving credit to the good citizens who were black?

sometime we should can the PC stuff and recognize FACTS on the ground!:rolleyes:
 
Shot by Piaget Crenshaw. The officer you see walking around not holding his eye or looking injured is the shooter.

I had an incident where I'd received a minor wound, didn't realize it until half an hour or so after the incident was over. I knew I'd been shot AT, didn't know I had been hit.

Adrenaline is AMAZING!

Which may or may not be the case here. Thing is, people don't all react the way the movies and tv have trained you to expect.

I also had one where a suspect wearing a cast swung at my head. I put up an arm to block it, he hit me on the elbow. Hurt like hell, I wound up getting x-rays because I thought it was broken. But I wouldn't wince or hold it, because I wouldn't give the prick the satisfaction. I sucked it up until after I got him booked.

Just another possibility.

The video seems less corroborative of the injury than an x-ray would be.
 
Then you didn't take my point.

No RACE "burned down the house". Individuals did. It would not take much effort to find people of the same race who disagree with those actions.

I believe I saw a video where some black people lined up in front of the liquor store to stop looters from going into it. So why yell about the black looters without giving credit to the good citizens who were black?

THIS is for YOU

You may or may not get it

from Laura Ingraham: “What do you think would have happened, guys, if tea party activists, right, came to Washington D.C. after the IRS scandal broke and decided to start smashing windows, rampaging through neighborhoods, throwing fire bombs. What do you think Eric Holder and Barack Obama would do? Would they start saying, ‘Well, we understand that people are angry, we really get your emotion here, but this isn’t acceptable. Do you really think there would have been this nuanced language, this emoting that has become the pastime of this administration?” Well, that’s not entirely off the table, these days.
 
Then you didn't take my point.

No RACE "burned down the house". Individuals did. It would not take much effort to find people of the same race who disagree with those actions.

I believe I saw a video where some black people lined up in front of the liquor store to stop looters from going into it. So why yell about the black looters without giving credit to the good citizens who were black?

Who were they stopping?

White cops?

They are individuals who in time of crises leap into the political designation and rhetoric of race victimology. They are people who voted almost 100% for President Obama because of his skin color. They are people demanding the cop go to jail for shooting a black man.

Of course, it is not ALL, you make a valid point, I gave you that, but you are using it to obfuscate the larger point which is clearly that this was a racially motivated shooting that would not occurred if the innocent UTE were white.
 

DEMENTED DAN....wrong ...Again


Ferguson: New York Times Buries News of Officer Wilson's Injury




The New York Times has big news on the biggest story in the country today but as Noah Rothman at Hot Air discovered, the Times buried that news 26 paragraphs deep. According to the Times' own police sources, "witnesses and forensic analysis have shown that Officer Wilson did sustain an injury during the struggle in the car."

However, law enforcement officials say witnesses and forensic analysis have shown that Officer Wilson did sustain an injury during the struggle in the car.

As Officer Wilson got out of his car, the men were running away. The officer fired his weapon but did not hit anyone, according to law enforcement officials.

Mr. Johnson took cover near a parked car as he saw the officer confronting Mr. Brown, Mr. Bosley said.

A man who lives nearby, Michael T. Brady, said in an interview that he saw the initial altercation in the patrol car, although he struggled to see exactly what was happening.

Obviously, the news that Wilson was injured during his struggle with 18 year-old Michael Brown is highly relevant to the ongoing investigation, not to mention the racial furor being whipped up by those uninterested in facts -- chief among them the media and racial grifters like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.

If Wilson was indeed injured, it doesn't automatically make the fatal shooting of Brown appropriate, but it does help to fill a yawning fact-vacuum with a piece of relevant information.

The fact that the Times hid its own scoop and no other mainstream media outlets are reporting on it is also informative. The news of the officer being injured would further upset and muddy the hysterical black vs. white narrative the media so desperately desires, along with the obvious political upside for the Left that comes with it.

While we don't know how this story will ultimately play out, the media's behavior in Ferguson is looking an awful lot like the reprehensible and corrupt behavior we saw during the Trayvon Martin affair.
 
Most assuredly. But hell, even a statement from someone other than a blogger would go a long way.

Ferguson: New York Times Buries News of Officer Wilson's Injury



The New York Times has big news on the biggest story in the country today but as Noah Rothman at Hot Air discovered, the Times buried that news 26 paragraphs deep. According to the Times' own police sources, "witnesses and forensic analysis have shown that Officer Wilson did sustain an injury during the struggle in the car."

However, law enforcement officials say witnesses and forensic analysis have shown that Officer Wilson did sustain an injury during the struggle in the car.

As Officer Wilson got out of his car, the men were running away. The officer fired his weapon but did not hit anyone, according to law enforcement officials.

Mr. Johnson took cover near a parked car as he saw the officer confronting Mr. Brown, Mr. Bosley said.

A man who lives nearby, Michael T. Brady, said in an interview that he saw the initial altercation in the patrol car, although he struggled to see exactly what was happening.

Obviously, the news that Wilson was injured during his struggle with 18 year-old Michael Brown is highly relevant to the ongoing investigation, not to mention the racial furor being whipped up by those uninterested in facts -- chief among them the media and racial grifters like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.

If Wilson was indeed injured, it doesn't automatically make the fatal shooting of Brown appropriate, but it does help to fill a yawning fact-vacuum with a piece of relevant information.

The fact that the Times hid its own scoop and no other mainstream media outlets are reporting on it is also informative. The news of the officer being injured would further upset and muddy the hysterical black vs. white narrative the media so desperately desires, along with the obvious political upside for the Left that comes with it.

While we don't know how this story will ultimately play out, the media's behavior in Ferguson is looking an awful lot like the reprehensible and corrupt behavior we saw during the Trayvon Martin affair.
 
Who were they stopping?

White cops?

They are individuals who in time of crises leap into the political designation and rhetoric of race victimology. They are people who voted almost 100% for President Obama because of his skin color. They are people demanding the cop go to jail for shooting a black man.

Of course, it is not ALL, you make a valid point, I gave you that, but you are using it to obfuscate the larger point which is clearly that this was a racially motivated shooting that would not occurred if the innocent UTE were white.

Yes, I'll go along with racially motivated. On the part of the AGITATORS, not on the part of the entire race.

You acknowledge that it is not all, but still phrase your sentences in such a way as to condemn all.

By all means condemn the looters. There is no cause to condemn their entire race for the looting.
 
Yes, I'll go along with racially motivated. On the part of the AGITATORS, not on the part of the entire race.

You acknowledge that it is not all, but still phrase your sentences in such a way as to condemn all.

By all means condemn the looters. There is no cause to condemn their entire race for the looting.

Get real. Nigguhs are looters and parasites, and Ragheads cut your head off. Fool!
 
Ferguson: New York Times Buries News of Officer Wilson's Injury



The New York Times has big news on the biggest story in the country today but as Noah Rothman at Hot Air discovered, the Times buried that news 26 paragraphs deep. According to the Times' own police sources, "witnesses and forensic analysis have shown that Officer Wilson did sustain an injury during the struggle in the car."

However, law enforcement officials say witnesses and forensic analysis have shown that Officer Wilson did sustain an injury during the struggle in the car.

As Officer Wilson got out of his car, the men were running away. The officer fired his weapon but did not hit anyone, according to law enforcement officials.

Mr. Johnson took cover near a parked car as he saw the officer confronting Mr. Brown, Mr. Bosley said.

A man who lives nearby, Michael T. Brady, said in an interview that he saw the initial altercation in the patrol car, although he struggled to see exactly what was happening.

Obviously, the news that Wilson was injured during his struggle with 18 year-old Michael Brown is highly relevant to the ongoing investigation, not to mention the racial furor being whipped up by those uninterested in facts -- chief among them the media and racial grifters like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.

If Wilson was indeed injured, it doesn't automatically make the fatal shooting of Brown appropriate, but it does help to fill a yawning fact-vacuum with a piece of relevant information.

The fact that the Times hid its own scoop and no other mainstream media outlets are reporting on it is also informative. The news of the officer being injured would further upset and muddy the hysterical black vs. white narrative the media so desperately desires, along with the obvious political upside for the Left that comes with it.

While we don't know how this story will ultimately play out, the media's behavior in Ferguson is looking an awful lot like the reprehensible and corrupt behavior we saw during the Trayvon Martin affair.

Wilson's injury is significant and undermines the prosecutions theory for police misconduct. When Johnson and Brown attacked Wilson Wilson was obligated to apprehend and arrest them. Cops shoot at fleeing suspects all the time.
 
Wilson's injury is significant and undermines the prosecutions theory for police misconduct. When Johnson and Brown attacked Wilson Wilson was obligated to apprehend and arrest them. Cops shoot at fleeing suspects all the time.

yes it is

that's why people here scream...ONLY A BLOG reported it....they DONT want it to be true

and

That's why the NYSlime buried


:rolleyes:
 
If he has injuries, we know he did not sustain them after the suspect was down, and he didn't sustain them whilst the decedent was walking innocently down the street.

I would love to see that reporters actual lead, before some political hack editor buried it. For the NYT to bury the lead to protect the current narrative suggests that the way they got the information make them believe the shooting will be found to be justified.

There are people that still are certain that Zimmerman either had no injuries or that his injuries were of such superficial importance that not reporting them was reasonable.


There are actual tragedies like the ones where cops have shot kids brandishing toy guns. The outrage when a split second (wrong) decision takes a life is very understandable. Those that are still puffing this as clearly an unjustified shooting are either blinded ideologically or disingenuous.

It is possible that this IS a bad shooting. Maybe the officer got pissed at taking a beating and after a disengagement period shot his assailant with disproportionate force applied.

The "innocent teen shot down in the back in cold blood by a white cop doing it for sport" is blown out of the water already.

Why is it that these thug's families in the age of camera phones never have have a current photo? Or is it that thugs only take unflattering "look at what a bad ass thug I am" photos?

Trayvon was a burglar, and this guy was a thug. Trayvon's shooting has been adjudicated, it was justified. Zimmerman should have gotten no-bill at the grand jury. We do not know whether this thug's shooting was justified or not, yet. Why are those fanning the flames so sure of what the facts are?
 
Balladeer08 said:
So why yell about the black looters without giving credit to the good citizens who were black?

You know very well why, or should. That wouldn't fan the fires.

Exactly right, aa. Fanning fires, for all sorts of reasons, is what this has become. Both literally and figuratively.

Those fans are now blowing steadily from both sides.
 
If he has injuries, we know he did not sustain them after the suspect was down, and he didn't sustain them whilst the decedent was walking innocently down the street.

I would love to see that reporters actual lead, before some political hack editor buried it. For the NYT to bury the lead to protect the current narrative suggests that the way they got the information make them believe the shooting will be found to be justified.

There are people that still are certain that Zimmerman either had no injuries or that his injuries were of such superficial importance that not reporting them was reasonable.


There are actual tragedies like the ones where cops have shot kids brandishing toy guns. The outrage when a split second (wrong) decision takes a life is very understandable. Those that are still puffing this as clearly an unjustified shooting are either blinded ideologically or disingenuous.

It is possible that this IS a bad shooting. Maybe the officer got pissed at taking a beating and after a disengagement period shot his assailant with disproportionate force applied.

The "innocent teen shot down in the back in cold blood by a white cop doing it for sport" is blown out of the water already.

Why is it that these thug's families in the age of camera phones never have have a current photo? Or is it that thugs only take unflattering "look at what a bad ass thug I am" photos?

Trayvon was a burglar, and this guy was a thug. Trayvon's shooting has been adjudicated, it was justified. Zimmerman should have gotten no-bill at the grand jury. We do not know whether this thug's shooting was justified or not, yet. Why are those fanning the flames so sure of what the facts are?

What are you drinking? Do you understand Brown didn't punch a homey he punched a cop who knew Brown was wanted for a felony robbery? When a cop says HALT, you halt. The cop had probable cause to arrest Brown and Johnson. Jesus! Why do all the Pabst Blue Ribbon Pussies come to LIT!
 
What are you drinking? Do you understand Brown didn't punch a homey he punched a cop who knew Brown was wanted for a felony robbery? When a cop says HALT, you halt. The cop had probable cause to arrest Brown and Johnson. Jesus! Why do all the Pabst Blue Ribbon Pussies come to LIT!

I have my suspicions based on the preponderance of the evidence already out there including that a cop pulled his weapon at all. I'm giving it the most generous POSSIBLE interpretation towards misconduct. Not one scenario more damning than this conjecture is even possible.

I do so to point out that the nimrods calling for the cop to be lynched are doing so not because of, but despite the preponderance of evidence that this was likely a righteous shooting.
 
Wilson's injury is significant, according to a single blog post,and may undermines the prosecution's theory for police misconduct. When Johnson and Brown attacked Wilson Wilson was obligated to apprehend and arrest them. Cops shoot at fleeing suspects all the time, but of course that's irrelevant to this particular case
Fixed it for you to make it true.

Brown may have attacked him. If Wilson pulled Brown in the window Brown may have inadvertently injured him trying to get away. That's, at best, resisting arrest, not attacking.
Saying he attacked him is speculation and is contrary to the, so far, public witness statements.
 
Last edited:
I have my suspicions based on the preponderance of the evidence already out there including that a cop pulled his weapon at all. I'm giving it the most generous POSSIBLE interpretation towards misconduct. Not one scenario more damning than this conjecture is even possible.

I do so to point out that the nimrods calling for the cop to be lynched are doing so not because of, but despite the preponderance of evidence that this was likely a righteous shooting.

During my mental health career I took down and restrained assholes every night. Most of them were detox admissions, and many came in armed with pistols, knives, even hand grenades. On one occasion a very crazy and large young man pulled a knife on me. We called the swat team but they were so timid I finally took the knife from the guy and restrained him by myself. I was aggressive and impatient in those days, and trained to immobilize large men (using pressure points to get their minds right) who threatened the nurses. You don't negotiate, you don't argue, you take them down.
 
Back
Top