Ishmael
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2001
- Posts
- 84,005
And I'll continue the editorial.
There are those that say the officer has no probably cause because at the time of the confrontation he was unaware of the strong arm robbery. (And we do know the robbery is a fact because Brown's pard has confessed to the robbery along with Brown.)
So Brown and his bud were merely jay-walking so why the belligerence on Brown's part? Because even though the officer may not have known at the time that Brown was leaving the scene of a strong-arm robbery, Brown knew that he was leaving the scene of a strong-arm robbery, he knew that he and his bud had the goods on them, and he had NO idea that the officer didn't know. As a matter of fact it would not be unreasonable for Brown to believe that the officer did know and was there to arrest him.
Brown's state of mind is just as open to conjecture as the officer's.
Ishmael
There are those that say the officer has no probably cause because at the time of the confrontation he was unaware of the strong arm robbery. (And we do know the robbery is a fact because Brown's pard has confessed to the robbery along with Brown.)
So Brown and his bud were merely jay-walking so why the belligerence on Brown's part? Because even though the officer may not have known at the time that Brown was leaving the scene of a strong-arm robbery, Brown knew that he was leaving the scene of a strong-arm robbery, he knew that he and his bud had the goods on them, and he had NO idea that the officer didn't know. As a matter of fact it would not be unreasonable for Brown to believe that the officer did know and was there to arrest him.
Brown's state of mind is just as open to conjecture as the officer's.
Ishmael