New Witness to Michael Brown Shooting

Brown couldn't have been running away from the COP and been shot in the back

UNLESS HE WAS RUNNING BACKWARDS

I actually thought you had sense and were reasonable

I was wrong

What you just wrote made no sense. But it's possible the cop missed if he shot at Brown while Brown was running away from him. It would be possible for a witness to think Brown was hit when he wasn't. It's also possible, in my opinion, for Brown to have been hit in the arm while running away. Perhaps not likely, but I wouldn't say it's impossible. Need more detailed information on the arm wounds to make that determination.
 
What you just wrote made no sense. But it's possible the cop missed if he shot at Brown while Brown was running away from him. It would be possible for a witness to think Brown was hit when he wasn't. It's also possible, in my opinion, for Brown to have been hit in the arm while running away. Perhaps not likely, but I wouldn't say it's impossible. Need more detailed information on the arm wounds to make that determination.

you are twisting yourself into a pretzel trying to force a crocodile in a manhole cover:rolleyes:
 
What you just wrote made no sense. But it's possible the cop missed if he shot at Brown while Brown was running away from him. It would be possible for a witness to think Brown was hit when he wasn't. It's also possible, in my opinion, for Brown to have been hit in the arm while running away. Perhaps not likely, but I wouldn't say it's impossible. Need more detailed information on the arm wounds to make that determination.

if the HULKING THUG was RUNNING and the COP shot and missed and HULKING THUG then TURNED AROUND and BUM RUSHED the cop


SHOOT THE MOFO!
 
to you


and you are aware of the transcript of the phone call?

where they say the HULKING THUG was BUM RUSHING the COP?

or

are you pretending ypu missed that one:mad:

Yes, I'm obviously aware of that inadvertent recording, which is why I said the individual recorded should be found, if possible. I don't think it will prove helpful to the cop if the individual can't be identified and found.
 
Yes, I'm obviously aware of that inadvertent recording, which is why I said the individual recorded should be found, if possible. I don't think it will prove helpful to the cop if the individual can't be identified and found.

that's weak!
 
We Are All Bunny Slippers

Pastor Jesse Lee Ferguson: Michael Brown Was a Thug




jesse-lee-petersonFrequent conservative commentator, and Pastor, Jesse Lee Peterson does not miss an opportunity to comment on young black men who he perceives as misguided.

You might recall that Pastor Jesse Lee Peterson called Trayvon Martin a thug back in 2013:


Peterson said that people like Obama and Sharpton have been “using black Americans by dividing the races” and “intimidating white people to get more power.”

Morgan attempted to ask if Peterson though the outcome would have been different if Martin had been white and worn a hoodie, like Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. He said it wouldn’t have mattered and declared that the portrayal of Trayvon Martin was “some innocent little kid, tip-toeing through the tulips” was an “absolute lie.”

“Trayvon Martin was a thug. His parents know that, you know that, I know that,” Peterson said.

It now seems that Peterson has the same judgment for Michael Brown, who was shot and killed just over a week ago in the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson, Missouri. Right Wing Watch reports:


As we have noted before, Jesse Lee Peterson of the Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny has carved out quite a niche for himself as a black conservative commentator who is quite willing to defend just about any white person accused of racism by arguing that it is black people who are the true racists in America.

So naturally, Steve Malzberg brought Peterson onto his Newsmax radio program today to share his thoughts on the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, which Peterson declared to be perfectly justified because Brown was a “thug,” just like Trayvon Martin.

“I’ve said from day one that Michael Brown is a thug,” Peterson declared, using as evidence “the fact that he was running from the cops, period, because good folks do not run from police officers, they follow their instructions.”

I don’t often agree with commentators from the left but in this case I would have to say that there is a point to be made. Over the last week much of America has been trying to find out what happened. Jesse Lee Peterson had his mind made up very early. Here is a video excerpt of his comments:



I do not doubt that Jesse Lee Peterson could eventually prove to be correct in this situation. We have previously found out that Michael Brown allegedly robbed a convenience store, and yesterday we discovered that Brown might have “bumrushed” officer Darren Wilson.

But there are witnesses on both sides and Jesse Lee Peterson needs to understand that he is polarizing people just as he accuses Sharpton of doing.

America doesn’t need to be divided over this shooting but there are those from the right and left who are trying to guarantee that we are.

This is not a black v. white issue.

This is not a conservative v. liberal issue.

This is about the truth needing to come out and justice needing to be served.

Again, in the end Pastor Peterson may end up being prophetic but he should also be seen as closed-minded. The facts are not all in and I seem to recall The Bible says something about judging others.

Was Michael Brown a thug? Probably so from what we have seen thus far.

But even thugs have rights in America. He was unarmed and if he truly surrendered as some witnesses claim, then there is no reason he should have been gunned down in cold blood. As for running from the cops? His friend claims that he was struck by the first bullet and ran in fear. He claims the “struggle” happened when the officer grabbed him. However likely or unlikely this story is, we must get to the facts.

The point is that we don’t know for sure what happened and talk like this is not helping. I have been guilty of it myself at times. We must constantly check ourselves and make sure that we are not becoming part of the problem. I realize that many will disagree with my observations, so please feel free to share your opinion in the comment section.

Hold your horses Pastor. There may very well be a future opportunity for you to grab the microphone and say “I told you so.”
 
if the HULKING THUG was RUNNING and the COP shot and missed and HULKING THUG then TURNED AROUND and BUM RUSHED the cop


SHOOT THE MOFO!

That's quite possibly what happened, but I see no way to know if that's what did happen, at this point.
 
ANY side that has HOLDER SHARPTON and JACKSON is the THUG (wrong) side
 
I am well aware of the fact witnesses are often wrong. That's why I said I found Tiffany Mitchell credible. If you get a statement from five witnesses to the same traumatic event, you will often get five different versions of what happened. Perhaps only slightly different, but sometimes vastly different.

This autopsy report is not that helpful in figuring out the crucial aspects of this case.

OK, what are the CRUCIAL aspects of this case?

The autopsy report has already called into question the credibility of some of the witnesses. And the toxicology report is going to be of interest as well.

Ishmael
 
Twice Baden called Michael Brown "the defendant." NOT victim.
 
Come on people, a black guy was shot, obviously he deserved to be executed because ...weed..black...thug.
 
OK, what are the CRUCIAL aspects of this case?

The autopsy report has already called into question the credibility of some of the witnesses. And the toxicology report is going to be of interest as well.

Ishmael

The crucial aspects have to do with whether Brown was attempting to surrender when the head shots hit him, or was instead charging at the cop. His head was obviously down at the moment the one bullet entered the top of his skull. That could mean he was simply falling forward after the first head shot, or it could mean he was charging at the cop. I don't see any way to know which might be the case.
 
The medical examiner found 3 bullets and no exit wounds. One wound was a superficial flesh graze. Two bullets were found inside the head. Therefore one bullet prolly caused 3 wounds or 4.

The bullet hole inside the police car may tell the tale.
 
The medical examiner found 3 bullets and no exit wounds. One wound was a superficial flesh graze. Two bullets were found inside the head. Therefore one bullet prolly caused 3 wounds or 4.

The bullet hole inside the police car may tell the tale.

Everyone seems to be in agreement the first shot was inside the cop's vehicle. What would a bullet hole inside the vehicle tell, other than that everyone was right?
 
Everyone seems to be in agreement the first shot was inside the cop's vehicle. What would a bullet hole inside the vehicle tell, other than that everyone was right?

Where do you get that from?

My understanding was that the cop took his first shot at the guy from inside the vehicle, while the murder victim was outside.

Reminds me of Caribou Barbie hunting seals from the safety of her helicopter....
 
Where do you get that from?

My understanding was that the cop took his first shot at the guy from inside the vehicle, while the murder victim was outside.

Reminds me of ABORTION BARBIE killing BABIES inside the MOTHERS....

Hello BOBBLEHEAD
 
Where do you get that from?

My understanding was that the cop took his first shot at the guy from inside the vehicle, while the murder victim was outside.

Reminds me of Caribou Barbie hunting seals from the safety of her helicopter....

It's not clear where the first shot went, but everyone seems in agreement that shot came from inside the vehicle. I don't see the controversy.
 
Everyone seems to be in agreement the first shot was inside the cop's vehicle. What would a bullet hole inside the vehicle tell, other than that everyone was right?

You mean that there was a struggle over the firearm?

Ishmael
 
Back
Top