Boxlicker101
Licker of Boxes
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2003
- Posts
- 33,665
According to the autopsy, Brown was shot six times - every one striking the front of his body. I don't have a link because I just heard this on the news.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Autopsy shows he was shot six times and none close range
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/us/michael-brown-autopsy-shows-he-was-shot-at-least-6-times.html
How can you tell the range? The clothing, which would have shown gunpowder traces, was not included in the examination.
The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body. However, that determination could change if it turns out that there is gunshot residue on Mr. Brown’s clothing, to which Dr. Baden did not have access.
How can you tell the range? The clothing, which would have shown gunpowder traces, was not included in the examination.
The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body. However, that determination could change if it turns out that there is gunshot residue on Mr. Brown’s clothing, to which Dr. Baden did not have access.
And that signifies WHAT? Meaningless minutia unless it contradicts the forensics and the testimony.
Quite frankly all that means is that Brown was further than 2 yards away from the weapon that killed him. How is this known? Powder residue. This information is NOT new, surprising, or inconsistent with any of the known facts. From an evidential standpoint it has NO significance at all.
But morons will grasp at any straw.
Ishmael
And that signifies WHAT? Meaningless minutia unless it contradicts the forensics and the testimony.
Quite frankly all that means is that Brown was further than 2 yards away from the weapon that killed him. How is this known? Powder residue. This information is NOT new, surprising, or inconsistent with any of the known facts. From an evidential standpoint it has NO significance at all.
But morons will grasp at any straw.
Ishmael
The gunpowder traces would be part of the forensics. It could make a big difference. If the gun muzzle was just inches away from the deceased, it would probably mean a struggle between the cop and the large young man. If the gun muzzle was twenty feet away, it would there was probably no struggle.
The location of the wounds in the front of Brown's body contradict some alleged eye witness testimony that he was running away.
We don't know the range yet and can't know without examining Brown's clothing.
The gunpowder traces would be part of the forensics. It could make a big difference. If the gun muzzle was just inches away from the deceased, it would probably mean a struggle between the cop and the large young man. If the gun muzzle was twenty feet away, it would there was probably no struggle.
The location of the wounds in the front of Brown's body contradict some alleged eye witness testimony that he was running away.
We don't know the range yet and can't know without examining Brown's clothing.
http://www.newrepublic.com/sites/default/files/u187078/screen_shot_2014-08-12_at_3.51.18_pm.png
Did you know that Americans are more likely to shoot a black man than a white man?
Well, we know that it was more than 2 yards, right?
Does that contradict any testimony? No. It's not an issue, it's a confirmation.
Ishmael
How can anybody know that?The range is calculated from the amount of gunpowder traces and those would appear on Brown's clothing, not on his bare skin. A partial exception might be the head wound, assuming he was not wearing a cap, but the ME would be able to tell more from the other injuries.
4 Unarmed Black Men Have Been Killed By Police in the Last Month
From New York City and LA to Ohio and Ferguson, MO, they all died under disputed circumstances.
—By Josh Harkinson
| Wed Aug. 13, 2014 9:50 PM EDT
I wonder why he doesn't have access to the clothing?
Still, six gunshot wounds? Ridiculous.
It's evidence...
![]()
... it only proves how stressed the shooter was and how determined the Ute was to engage in suicide by cop.
21 Things You Can Arrested For if You are Black in America:
Here are 21 examples from the last five years of some of the things black people can't do without others thinking they're up to no good.
1. Listen to loud music at a gas station.
2. Walk home from a snack run to 7-11.
3. Wear a hoodie.
4. Drive after swimming.
5. Drive in a car with a white girl.
6. Appear in public in New York City.
7. Walk on the wrong side of the street.
8. Wait for a school bus to take you to your high school basketball game.
9. Drink iced tea in a parking lot.
10. Seek help after a car accident.
11. Inspect your own property.
12. Show up at your job.
13. Talk trash after an NFL game.
14. Throw a temper tantrum in kindergarten.
15. Buy designer accessories at Barney’s.
16. Buy designer accessories at Macy’s.
17. Be a 13-year-old boy.
18. Enter your own home.
19. Botch a science experiment.
20. Be a tourist.
21. Lay face down in handcuffs.
A few items to add to your list:
A. bum rush a cop with a gun
B. rob a store
C. loot
A guy, kind of a douchebag, stole $50 worth of cigars from a store. He could do it because he was bigger than most.
He was gunned down in the streets for it. No judge. No jury. No justice. And that is seriously wrong.
But, there are only three questions that need to be answered:
1) Why did he do it?
2) How can we teach the next douchebag to make better choices?
3) What can be done to demilitarize domestic law enforcement?
I'm thinking that once the evidence is in, it will be presented to a grand jury, and the officer will be indicted.
I'm thinking that once the evidence is in, it will be presented to a grand jury, and the officer will be indicted.
I'm thinking that once the evidence is in, it will be presented to a grand jury, and the officer will be indicted.
It will probably be presented to a grand jury before all the facts are in, and if it is, the chances of the cop not being indicted are slim and none. Ham sandwich, and all that.
I agree. He might be. And perhaps deservedly so. But the evidence is beginning to pile up against the deceased. Apparently the officer had some sort of eye damage. And about a dozen witnesses have corroborated his story of the deceased rushing towards him.