New Witness to Michael Brown Shooting

Fox News code words, for you know, "those" rioting :rolleyes:

I don't have time to get caught up in all the political drama and party talking points. Fox is racist! CNN are commies! Your just a puppet when you buy into that. The only things reported on the news are ....opinions. I don't watch fox news, in fact I rarely watch any news at all for ^^^ that reason.

There are only 4 shows I sometimes watch on TV .Blacklist, Once upon a Time, Elementary and Arrow.
 
So why were the police out firing tear gas and threatening to kill reporters several hours in advance of the announced curfew? Ya think maybe someone gave them a warning that the autopsy report was going to indicate that the unarmed Brown got the full Sonny Corleone treatment?
 
I don't have time to get caught up in all the political drama and party talking points. Fox is racist! CNN are commies! Your just a puppet when you buy into that. The only things reported on the news are ....opinions. I don't watch fox news, in fact I rarely watch any news at all for ^^^ that reason.

There are only 4 shows I sometimes watch on TV .Blacklist, Once upon a Time, Elementary and Arrow.

I gave up on the news when it become dueling banjos
 
so the COP HATING THUG was shot in the front...3 times in hand, which wouldn't have stopped the HULKING BEAST as he was BUM RUSHING a AW ENFORCEMENT official

COP INNOCENT

We can all go home

:cool:
 
Preliminary Autopsy Shows Michael Brown Not Shot Running Away, Was Shot In Front


xMichael-Brown-shot-in-front.png.pagespeed.ic.u88qipYnV8

So the witnesses who claimed he was shot in the back lied or were “confused” (Also some of the same people saying his hands were up). This more readily matches the story we posted about earlier, that Brown may have charged the officer.
 
NO

JUAN

CARES


Chicago Shootings Leave 3 Dead, 16 Wounded


chi-photos-overnight-violence-in-chicago-20140-084

Chicago needs a curfew.

Via Chicago Tribune


Three people were killed, including two 16-year-olds, and sixteen others injured in shootings across the city between late Saturday morning and early Sunday morning, police said.

The fatal shootings occurred near Pulaski Road about two miles apart.

The first was about 11:45 p.m. Saturday a few blocks east of Pulaski in the 2300 block of N. Springfield Avenue in the Logan Square neighborhood on the Northwest Side. Three people were shot, two fatally, after someone on a sidewalk fired several shots toward a car, police said.

A 21-year-old man, the driver of the car, was pronounced dead at Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center. He had been shot in the head. A 16-year-old boy also died at that hospital after he suffered a back wound and a grazed cheek.

A third person, 18, is in good condition at Norwegian American Hospital. He was shot in the hand.

The Cook County medical examiner’s office was notified of the two deaths but wouldn’t release other information, including the identities of the victims.

The second fatal shooting was south of there, about 1:15 a.m. Sunday in the 900 block of North Karlov Avenue, a few blocks west of Pulaski in the Humboldt Park neighborhood on the West Side. A 16-year-old boy was shot in the head and taken to Mount Sinai Hospital, police said. Police had responded to a call of a person shot there and found the boy wounded.
 
gee, the BLACK THUG LIED....so whats new?

Here it is folks. Seems to corroborate the cop’s story. I’d say an arrest warrant should be out for the guy with him because he lied and the riots are going on. Brown sounds high and ran at the cop.

—————————————————————————————–

The original video poster appears sympathetic to the narrative that Mike Brown was shot unarmed with his hands in the air. But he unknowingly picks up conversation between a man who saw the altercation and another neighbor.

An approximate transcription of the background conversation, as related by the “Conservative Treehouse” blog:

@6:28/6:29 of video

#1 How’d he get from there to there?

#2 Because he ran, the police was still in the truck – cause he was like over the truck

{crosstalk}

#2 But him and the police was both in the truck, then he ran – the police got out and ran after him

{crosstalk}

#2 Then the next thing I know he doubled back toward him cus – the police had his gun drawn already on him –

#1. Oh, the police got his gun

#2 The police kept dumpin on him, and I’m thinking the police kept missing – he like – be like – but he kept coming toward him

{crosstalk}

#2 Police fired shots – the next thing I know – the police was missing

#1 The Police?

#2 The Police shot him

#1 Police?

#2 The next thing I know … I’m thinking … the dude started running … (garbled something about “he took it from him”)


This is terribly important because if Mike Brown had been shot, and he advanced towards the cop instead of surrendering, it would substantiate the narrative that the policeman shot in self-defense due to the fact that he was being threatened with severe bodily harm.



This corroborates an account of the event given by a friend of Officer Darren Wilson:


Well, then Michael takes off and gets to be about 35 feet away. And, Darren’s first protocol is to pursue. So, he stands up and yells, “Freeze!” Michael and his friend turn around. And Michael taunts him… And then all the sudden he just started bumrushing him. He just started coming at him full speed. And, so he just started shooting. And, he just kept coming. And, so he really thinks he was on something.”
 
Obama orders autopsy #3 on Michael Brown. Looks like they cant find what they wanna find.
 
they will take the MAGIC BULLET from a FAILED DUMOH Pres....John FUCK AROUND Kennedy and plant it in the BLACK HULKING THUG
 
Multiple times? That's assuming if he even attacked him.
The supreme court has ruled that it's an acceptable use of force. I don't know all the details so I won't offer an opinion on if it was justified.

That said, if a cop is justified in shooting a suspect, one that is fleeing, or one that is attacking him, he's justified in shooting enough times to stop him.


I don't know how they apply the fleeing felon rule in Missouri, so I won't comment on it.
My guess would be that how they apply it and whether it's legal could be two different things, since there's been a SCOTUS ruling on it.
 
Last edited:
Preliminary Autopsy Shows Michael Brown Not Shot Running Away, Was Shot In Front


xMichael-Brown-shot-in-front.png.pagespeed.ic.u88qipYnV8

So the witnesses who claimed he was shot in the back lied or were “confused” (Also some of the same people saying his hands were up). This more readily matches the story we posted about earlier, that Brown may have charged the officer.

Those were credible, believable witnesses backed up by touab's vast investigatory experience so the ME must be white, must be a racist and MUST BE LYING!

:mad:
 
EXPOSED, REVERSAL OF ALLEGED FACTS!!!: Officer Darren Wilson DID KNOW About Robbery, Started To Arrest Michael Brown, So BROWN TRIED TO MURDER HIM

http://patdollard.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/081514_tobin1400_video2_640.jpg


EXPOSED, REVERSAL OF ALLEGED FACTS!!!: Officer Darren Wilson DID KNOW About Robbery, Started To Arrest Michael Brown, So BROWN TRIED TO MURDER HIM



Michael Brown fought his arrest and tried to kill Darren Wilson because he had the stolen goods on him and didn’t want to go to jail for many years for a Class A Felony. It has been misinterpreted that Wilson didn’t know that Brown might’ve just committed a robbery, because when he first stopped for Brown he in fact didn’t know. HOWEVER, in the middle of the process, a call came in on his radio telling him about the robbery, and Brown fit the description, so he backed up and tried to get out to begin the arrest process by investigating the evidence in Brown’s hand, when Brown attacked and tried to kill him. Check it all out below:

Excerpted from The Dana Show: A woman claiming to be a friend of the officer involved in the shooting of Ferguson’s Mike Brown called into my program offering Darren Wilson’s side of the story. Video via my show’s flagship station, KFTK in St. Louis:



Transcript via Gateway Pundit:

“He pulled up ahead of them. And then he got a call-in that there was a strong-arm robbery. And, they gave a description. And, he’s looking at them and they got something in their hands and it looks like it could be what, you know those cigars or whatever. So he goes in reverse back to them. Tries to get out of his car. They slam his door shut violently. I think he said Michael did. And, then he opened the car again. He tried to get out. He stands up.

And then Michael just bum-rushes him and shoves him back into his car. Punches him in the face and them Darren grabs for his gun. Michael grabbed for the gun. At one point he got the gun entirely turned against his hip. And he shoves it away. And the gun goes off.

Well, then Michael takes off and gets to be about 35 feet away. And, Darren’s first protocol is to pursue. So, he stands up and yells, “Freeze!” Michael and his friend turn around. And Michael taunts him… And then all the sudden he just started bumrushing him. He just started coming at him full speed. And, so he just started shooting. And, he just kept coming. And, so he really thinks he was on something.”

Read more at http://patdollard.com/2014/08/watch...n-tried-to-murder-wilson/#Syht7QHzZAomL6Z4.99

NOT CREDIBLE!!!

Hearsay!


:mad:
 
Tiffany Mitchell had already given a statement to the police prior to the Don Lemon interview, so raising the issue of Lemon possibly coaching her to say what she said during the interview is stupid. Whether her version of what happened is accurate or not, Don Lemon had nothing to do with it.

Apparently people here are finding it difficult to understand that I'm not saying Tiffany Mitchell's version of what happened is proof of what happened. It's only eyewitness evidence of what happened, and should simply be considered along with any other evidence that can be gathered in an effort to determine the true facts of the situation.

Until better evidence comes along, Tiffany Mitchell's version of what happened is going to carry a lot of weight, and would undoubtedly pose a serious problem for the defense during a murder trial, should one occur. Anyone who denies that is not being realistic.

Let me make something else crystal clear. I've said from the beginning Brown brought his shooting on himself. Even before I knew about the strong arm robbery he had committed, I said all he had to do to avoid being shot was follow police orders.

The bottom line on this is going to be whether or not Brown was surrendering when he was shot fatally. Eyewitness testimony may be the best evidence available to make the determination as to that issue, and if it is, the officer is in deep shit, rightly or wrongly.

SEE!

CREDIBLE!!!

This is the stuff of conviction!
 
And why wasn't a federal medical examiner present when the state did its autopsy? This stinks to high heaven.

Ishmael

It does. It seems rather obvious Holder is taking sides on this. Highly inappropriate.

Do you get it yet?

THE TEMPLATE!

The press, the race warlords, the administration, THE WITNESSES!

The story was already written in their heads. They've been writing it for years. The story was the gospel truth and everything they see and hear fits the story or they reject it out of hand and stick with the story, not unlike our beautiful people on the Left who post here.

The cop is guilty no matter what. The witnesses truly BELIEVE they saw him being shot in the back because they have been manipulated for years by constant unrelenting propaganda from the people who claim to be taking care of them (because they can't take care of themselves, the OPPRESSION MEME).
__________________
Obama, you see, is our nemesis. He is a totem, the logical manifestation of a warped media, the reification of some crazy — and arrogant — ideas about redistributive politics, the statist economy, and cultural and social life that permeated American life the last forty years. He is the president with a 1,000 faces that we have all seen at work, on TV, throughout American life, and at some point the odds determined that we had to have a rendezvous with him— perhaps a catharsis to teach us the wages of Keynesian debt, of a social policy contrary to human nature with its equality of result doctrines, of an all-powerful, all-growing unaccountable government, of the now hip ambiguity about past American protocols and history. Obama is the exaggeration of all the dubious ideas that arose since the 1960s — brought to fruition on his watch, delivered by mellifluous cadences by an untouchable persona.

In fact, a Barack Obama was long overdue. Had he not appeared out of nowhere in 2008, we would have surely had to invent him.

Victor Davis Hanson
 
Back
Top